-------------------------
I'll add one observation. Terry has taken Jaden Bradley under his wing as an undrafted guy, and by all accounts, he's doing well. Terry keeps working with him after practice. He has a LONG LONG way to go to make the 53, because say what you want about the top end of the WR room, it is deep. He'd have to dislodge at least 2, if not all 3 of Van Jefferson, Burks and DBrown (with the assumption Terry, Williams, McCaffery and Lane are locks). And they really might sign Diggs.
So that's a long road to hoe to get on to the roster, but multiple pods have commented on it, Terry has spoken at length about working with him, and how impressed he is. So I'm filing that in the back of my mind to see if maybe they have a gem they can develop over time.
Seems like every camp has that young UDFA WR to watch out for -- forgetting which local had some fun with the idea -- I think it was Standig but I might be forgetting who goes they are the guy into the season starts and then they disappear. Having said they are do for some UDFA Wr to finally excel so you never know.
But yeah I've noticed the Bradley notices.
It's definitely a deep WR room, but it's also one of the strangest I've seen in all my years following football. I think it's at the heart of why fans are so divided on this group.
In my opinion, no team in the NFL has a better collection of No. 4 receivers than Washington. No one. At the same time, outside of maybe Miami, I don't think any contender has a weaker No. 2 receiver. Then there's the No. 3 spot, which is one of the biggest wild cards in the league. On top of that, your No. 1 receiver is getting older, and history tells us injuries become more common and decline eventually comes for every receiver.
Take Bram's argument, for example. He adds up what all of these receivers caught last season—or what he projects they'll catch—and says, "This guy's good for 20 catches, this one 30, this one 15." Then he combines those totals and concludes that, collectively, they equal a legitimate No. 2 receiver.
On the surface, that sounds logical, but it doesn't hold up.
Every NFL team gets production from its fourth, fifth, and even sixth receivers. Those players aren't invisible. They're all making catches too. You can't just take the production of your backup receivers, lump it together, and call it the equivalent of having a quality No. 2. Of course if you add your 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th WR you will have combined at a minimum the production of a typical 2 on really any team.
The real question isn't whether the depth pieces can combine for 60 or 70 catches. The question is whether you have someone defenses actually have to game-plan for as a true second receiving threat. To me, that's the issue—and it's why I think this receiver room is both unusually deep and unusually vulnerable at the same time.