They only get a 2nd and 4th for pick 7? seems liteMcShay new mock. Before 7: Reese, Bailey, Love, Styles. Downs-Delane go 10 and 11
Washington trades with the Jets, gets a 2nd and 4th and drafts Omar Cooper.
They only get a 2nd and 4th for pick 7? seems liteMcShay new mock. Before 7: Reese, Bailey, Love, Styles. Downs-Delane go 10 and 11
Washington trades with the Jets, gets a 2nd and 4th and drafts Omar Cooper.
Brugler did a 7 rounder, we took Love over Tate.
Downs went to NYG, Styles to DAL at 6 (trade up w CLE).
I would prefer Tate, but would be happy with Love.
Had us taking Hurst at 71
Watched some draft takes from insider types, including one from an ex-Titans GM who knows the people in that building and Saleh well. Long story short, Titans might take Styles. If not the Giants might. Dallas supposedly interested in trading up for him.
Adding to all, doubtful Styles lands at 7. Having said that just listened to a Keim podcast, and at this stage of the game he typically can make a good guess at a minimum ballpark some things. So today he did a podcast on defense. He strongly hinted on that side of the ball, he believes they like Sonny Styles and Mansoor Delane the most. If so Delane likely is the default pick. I am guessing tomorrow he does the offensive players.
He also hinted they likely see Delane > Downs.
Delane and Tate appear to be need picks who can contribute immediately. While Styles could end up being a real impact player but it will take time. As someone pointed out DQ is on borrowed time,
AP needs a winner. I fear they will pass over the better long term player for these reasons.
They only get a 2nd and 4th for pick 7? seems lite
Ive seen some having Theneman over Downs also. That's what I keep telling people that a lot of these guys are similar to some people so trading down to 16 is not too far for the right dealI was listening to the Joe Klatt Show with with Daniel Jeremiah, he said he knows there are teams that have Thieneman over Downs and some have McNeil-Warren in the running. This competition at the position is part of the reason some show Downs falling.
He thinks there's a good chance Thieneman goes 12 to Dallas
Plus #16 ?They only get a 2nd and 4th for pick 7? seems lite
Styles to the Titans and Downs or Tate to the Giants would line things up exactly as I’d like to drop Love to us.
Also listened to the Keim podcast. He really seemed to be leaning into Styles and Delane. And explicitly said he thought they’d prefer Delane to Downs because of the positional value. Based on listening to him, I’d guess that they prefer Love as a 1st option and one of Delane or Stules if he’s not there. But I’m not sure where he would say Tate falls on their list.
I’d be pretty thrilled with Delane.
Exactly what I said- I see the value from an organizational perspective. But I have read more than one post referencing value from how the players will view the team. Again, it’s not free agency, it’s the draft. How the players feel is wholly irrelevant.
Plus #16 ?
That makes sense, thanksBecause its an early 2nd -- if I recall seeing somewhere the even exchange is for just a 2nd, so at least on one of those point scales the 4th rounder is a topper-bonus.
Yup and he spoke of that as well. It is possible. I hate because I loved Theineman when he was an early 2nd on all the boards and thought he'd be a steal at that pointtIve seen some having Theneman over Downs also. That's what I keep telling people that a lot of these guys are similar to some people so trading down to 16 is not too far for the right deal
Poor man's Downs (which is not bad)Scott is a slot safety / box SS. He is not a nickel corner.
There difference is coverage ability and what he is asked to do on a regular basis.
If we took Scott at 71, we’d need to use him more like a safety than a nickel corner.

Nothing like Downs. This dude is a hitter and ball hawk. Downs can hit, but is more cerebral and more risk averse. Different animals.Poor man's Downs (which is not bad)
Listening to Keim it sounds like Styles is worth a high pick if he can rush the passer, he mentions having a the LB coach from OSU on who said Styles would play the Reese role if Reese was not on the team. To me, that sounds like a big projection.
Styles looks a lot like Tremaine Edwards to me. Both great athletes, better v pass than run.
I'd be OK w Styles, but I have him after Love, Tate and Downs.