The 2026 Draft Thread - Day 3

He made the grave mistake of being the only RB to participate in the 3-cone. He shit the bed in a historically bad way (8th percentile). Only two RB’s have ever been drafted below 10th percentile.

I respect that he did the drill when so many players aren’t. And over time that’ll skew the draft history I referenced above. But he put up the 3-cone time of a cement truck doing a U-turn, he may be available in the 6th or 7th now.

His best asset is his vision so he could be a good value in the 6th or 7th. In say the third round I thought he lacked the power profile to break tackles and wasn't a dynamic enough athlete to create explosive plays through athleticism. But he almost always made the right read, he understands how to hold defenders by pressing one gap before cutting back, he has a nice jump cut. I think he'll be a good running back in the NFL. More of one of a committee than a workhorse back. Don't know if we need another of those, but in the 6th or 7th round he feels like he would be a value pick.
 
I watched Keylan Rutledge, the 6'4, 316-pound guard out of Georgia Tech, against Colorado. He’s a very physical player — a mauler who put defenders on their backs multiple times — but his lack of NFL-caliber physical tools (foot speed, lateral quickness, knee and hip flexibility) limits his ceiling. The toughness and play demeanor are easy to like. The question is whether the athletic limitations cap him as more of a depth piece than a long-term starter.

As a run blocker, he plays with violent hands that jolt defenders and he has good grip strength. He absolutely plays to the whistle and isn’t afraid of car-crash collisions, which shows up especially on pulls. That said, his lack of knee bend forces him to lean too far forward to generate leverage, so he doesn’t naturally play low. His lateral quickness is just okay, and he struggled to prevent defenders from crossing his face on outside zone — at least once it happened cleanly, and even on other reps it felt like a fight. As a climber, the results were mixed. There were reps where he was late getting to the second level or got his weight too far over his skis. He keeps his eyes up on duo blocks and did have some good climbs, but he tends to go for the homerun punch rather than squaring up, which occasionally leads to missed contact.

As a pass blocker, he’s tough to beat in a phone booth. His anchor is solid, and his core strength allows him to bend into a backward “C” without giving up ground. He’s rarely beaten straight through the chest. When he does lose, it’s typically on the outside shoulder. His feet are heavy and a bit clunky, so if his hand placement isn’t right, that outside half becomes vulnerable. His grip strength helps — once he latches on, it’s hard to disengage him — but his hand placement is inconsistent. On one rep he shot his hands too early, making them vulnerable to a swipe. When the hands and feet aren’t synced, that’s when you see him give up pressure or risk a holding call.

Athletically, he has natural core strength and toughness, but the limitations are real. The lack of knee bend makes him play high. The limited hip flexibility and heavy feet make it difficult for him to redirect cleanly. His foot speed isn’t great. He’s a tough, physical mauler, but he’ll need to win with technique and consistency because the natural movement skills aren’t going to bail him out at the next level.

From a Commanders standpoint, he’s a viable Day 3 option — probably in the fifth or sixth round range. He’s tough, physical, and hard-nosed, which fits the identity you’d want up front. But because of the athletic limitations, he has to be technically sharp to project as a starter. Colorado was Georgia Tech’s first game of the season, so some sloppiness is understandable, but based on this tape I wouldn’t feel comfortable taking him at 71 as a projected starter. I preferred Jalen Farmer’s tape. Rutledge at 145 is reasonable, and he could be good value in the sixth round range.
 
I watched Keylan Rutledge, the 6'4, 316-pound guard out of Georgia Tech, against Colorado. He’s a very physical player — a mauler who put defenders on their backs multiple times — but his lack of NFL-caliber physical tools (foot speed, lateral quickness, knee and hip flexibility) limits his ceiling. The toughness and play demeanor are easy to like. The question is whether the athletic limitations cap him as more of a depth piece than a long-term starter.

As a run blocker, he plays with violent hands that jolt defenders and he has good grip strength. He absolutely plays to the whistle and isn’t afraid of car-crash collisions, which shows up especially on pulls. That said, his lack of knee bend forces him to lean too far forward to generate leverage, so he doesn’t naturally play low. His lateral quickness is just okay, and he struggled to prevent defenders from crossing his face on outside zone — at least once it happened cleanly, and even on other reps it felt like a fight. As a climber, the results were mixed. There were reps where he was late getting to the second level or got his weight too far over his skis. He keeps his eyes up on duo blocks and did have some good climbs, but he tends to go for the homerun punch rather than squaring up, which occasionally leads to missed contact.

As a pass blocker, he’s tough to beat in a phone booth. His anchor is solid, and his core strength allows him to bend into a backward “C” without giving up ground. He’s rarely beaten straight through the chest. When he does lose, it’s typically on the outside shoulder. His feet are heavy and a bit clunky, so if his hand placement isn’t right, that outside half becomes vulnerable. His grip strength helps — once he latches on, it’s hard to disengage him — but his hand placement is inconsistent. On one rep he shot his hands too early, making them vulnerable to a swipe. When the hands and feet aren’t synced, that’s when you see him give up pressure or risk a holding call.

Athletically, he has natural core strength and toughness, but the limitations are real. The lack of knee bend makes him play high. The limited hip flexibility and heavy feet make it difficult for him to redirect cleanly. His foot speed isn’t great. He’s a tough, physical mauler, but he’ll need to win with technique and consistency because the natural movement skills aren’t going to bail him out at the next level.

From a Commanders standpoint, he’s a viable Day 3 option — probably in the fifth or sixth round range. He’s tough, physical, and hard-nosed, which fits the identity you’d want up front. But because of the athletic limitations, he has to be technically sharp to project as a starter. Colorado was Georgia Tech’s first game of the season, so some sloppiness is understandable, but based on this tape I wouldn’t feel comfortable taking him at 71 as a projected starter. I preferred Jalen Farmer’s tape. Rutledge at 145 is reasonable, and he could be good value in the sixth round range.

Do you think he could succeed in an Outside Zone rush attack? His agility testing was good at the combine, but I understand that doesn't really encompass everything a blocker needs to be fluid in space.
 
The PK from Hawaii Kansei Matsuzawa and Tate Sandell from U of Oklahoma look to be the best of the bunch but compared to last year when there was both Borregales and Fitzgerald, the field doesn't look too hot.
 
The PK from Hawaii Kansei Matsuzawa and Tate Sandell from U of Oklahoma look to be the best of the bunch but compared to last year when there was both Borregales and Fitzgerald, the field doesn't look too hot.

I'm probably looking at the UFL for a kicker to bring into camp for competition. I don't like rookie PKs because so many fail in their first stop and you can't be patient with them and let them develop
 
Do you think he could succeed in an Outside Zone rush attack? His agility testing was good at the combine, but I understand that doesn't really encompass everything a blocker needs to be fluid in space.

I only watched one game, but he didn't look that agile to me. On one outside zone run he let the defender cross his face and on a couple others it felt like a struggle to prevent that from happening. At not point did he cross a defenders face to scoop them out though he tried a couple time. Realistically I am not going to watch more tape of him, but if I was a scout the good agility testing would perhaps make me go back to his tape and verify my impressions of limited mobility. What I saw on tape was more a mauler, he plays to the whistle, he has violent hands, he puts people on their butts (but that is good and bad because he is a homerun swinger and has some strikes out where he goes for the big punch and it does land). He did have some good climbs and pulls too. His anchor and grip strength were excellent. But I didn't see the knee bend to have good natural leverage, the hip flexibility to redirect, the lateral quickness (despite the testing) and footspeed to always hit landmarks.
 
At the Senior Bowl Rutledge was really strong with a good anchor in one on ones, but occasionally he'd lunge with his punch, get out of balance, and then struggle. When he didn't do that he looked dominant in one on ones.

Probably not a fit if he doesn't have natural light feet to recover from poor moves.
 
I watched Zane Durant's one on one tape in the Senior Bowl. If we really are going towards a 1 gap sell out for pressure defense then he's such a good fit. He gets into the backfield and makes the interior pocket so messy on every play.

The OL can recover a little and get him to the wrong side of the QB, but the QB still has to hold the rock and step away from him. In a pressure defense that buys enough time for someone else to then exert their pressure.

He's someone that really needs the right scheme and role, but could be really outperform in that fit.
 
Two positions I see that teams are often able to come up with guys late that contribute in the NFL are at defensive tackle and wide receiver.

The league is so biased at WR on measurables that often a guy that is a bit shorter or has merely 4.5 speed is ignored in the early rounds despite college production and teams are able to get a good #3 late.

Ditto at DT where guys that are 6'0 and 315-320 that have a low center of gravity are ignored by teams in the early rounds because they have limited pass rush/athletic eye popping skills.

But you can get guys that are solid run stoppers and situational defenders on a cheap rookie contract for several years that turn out be real bargains.
 
Two positions I see that teams are often able to come up with guys late that contribute in the NFL are at defensive tackle and wide receiver.

The league is so biased at WR on measurables that often a guy that is a bit shorter or has merely 4.5 speed is ignored in the early rounds despite college production and teams are able to get a good #3 late.

Ditto at DT where guys that are 6'0 and 315-320 that have a low center of gravity are ignored by teams in the early rounds because they have limited pass rush/athletic eye popping skills.

But you can get guys that are solid run stoppers and situational defenders on a cheap rookie contract for several years that turn out be real bargains.
I have been anticipating they use a later day 3 pick on a DT and an IOL.

Now that they are signing IOL backups to multi-year deals I am not so sure but is nice having a developmental OL.

A DT/NT on the other hand would be a welcomed selection.

The later rounds are also a good place to grab backup RB's which we will not need and DB's and LB's that can play STs and we could use a QB3 >Hartman
 
His best asset is his vision so he could be a good value in the 6th or 7th. In say the third round I thought he lacked the power profile to break tackles and wasn't a dynamic enough athlete to create explosive plays through athleticism. But he almost always made the right read, he understands how to hold defenders by pressing one gap before cutting back, he has a nice jump cut. I think he'll be a good running back in the NFL. More of one of a committee than a workhorse back. Don't know if we need another of those, but in the 6th or 7th round he feels like he would be a value pick.
Johnson is def more quick than fast, he was caught on quite few runs that should have been housed.

As a day 3 pick he has intrigue, but not sure he is better than what is already on the roster.
 
Two positions I see that teams are often able to come up with guys late that contribute in the NFL are at defensive tackle and wide receiver.

The league is so biased at WR on measurables that often a guy that is a bit shorter or has merely 4.5 speed is ignored in the early rounds despite college production and teams are able to get a good #3 late.

Ditto at DT where guys that are 6'0 and 315-320 that have a low center of gravity are ignored by teams in the early rounds because they have limited pass rush/athletic eye popping skills.

But you can get guys that are solid run stoppers and situational defenders on a cheap rookie contract for several years that turn out be real bargains.

Late round WR are one of the lowest hit rate positions overall, actually, unless you’re talking about pure depth. There are just some very visible examples of late round hits skewing perception right now (Nacua, Diggs, ARSB, and Juaun Jennings being some of the biggest).

But for instance, Jamison Crowder is one of the best 4th round WR’s in recent memory. Antonio Brown was a HOF talent but is nearly the only relevant 6th round WR anyone could name. In addition to the guys I listed above, those are MOST of the recent difference-makers taken after the 3rd round. And their draft years are all over the place.

Using mid-late round picks at WR is one of the least efficient things you can possible do, overall. Unless you’re happy with depth players and special teamers. It’s extremely rare for a late round WR to turn into a truly productive WR.

So…disagree entirely.

Could be true about DL but I’m less well-versed and don’t feel like double-checking. But the confident WR whiff makes it hard to trust on a surface level.
 
To me, in the later rounds, you want to go after positions that are less targeted early unless someone you had rated very highly falls to you.

IOL, nose tackles, tight ends, sometimes backer, return guys, sometimes running backs, kickers, punters, etc.

There is generally higher quality in IOL5 vs WR25. There are exceptions to the rules, of course. Just like there are with premium positions in the top 10 not always being the best bet.
 
IF he's there in the 5th (Western Michigan EDGE Nadame Tucker ), I hope AP takes him.
 
We need a backup to JD5. Here's hoping we can land Cole Payton from NDSU later on Day 3.
 
With only 6 picks this year my vote is to go with a veteran backup and look for a younger pick next year.

There's simply too much to address on this team to pick a guy that likely wouldn't be seeing the field in 2026.
 
With only 6 picks this year my vote is to go with a veteran backup and look for a younger pick next year.

There's simply too much to address on this team to pick a guy that likely wouldn't be seeing the field in 2026.
I still think we are going to see one or two trade backs (not necessarily from pick 7) to gain a later round pick or two. This would be a good year to get rid of Hartman if they can find someone in the late rounds that they like for a QB3
 
  • Like
Reactions: RWJ
Ohio State DE Caden Curry, he's a bit undersized, with Bain like arms, but he played real well for OSU this yr.

1st team all big ten, 11 sacks, 16.5 TFL

Would be worth a look on day 3
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 10, Members: 0, Guests: 10)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top