The 2026 Draft Thread - Day 3

Primus Porcus

The Hall of Famer
Staff member
BGO Ownership Group
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Runner-up #2
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
13,784
Reaction score
6,191
Points
793
Location
Middletown, VA
The original draft thread has largely been about the 7th pick in the draft, so a lot of the day 2 prospects have gotten lost in the wash, figured we could have a thread dedicated to these options so they get their due attention.



Currently we have 4 picks on day 3

Round 5 - #145 overall
Round 6 - #187 overall
Round 6 - #197 overall
Round 7 - #224 overall
 
Last edited:
Sneaky day 3 pick?




J. Michael Sturdivant - WR - Florida - 6'3 - 213lb

Projected to run a 4.38 in the 40

I don't see top tier separation, but were talking about a guy who's going late day 3. Measurables could make it worth taking a shot... also has Special Teams experience.
 
Love a developmental guy with tools, but there does come a point where you can only have so many of them on a competitive roster. I’m not sure we’re at that point, but it’s worth wondering. Consensus seems to be that we need at least two new starting WR’s to go alongside Terry (FA or draft), let’s say two to keep it simple. And then we have Lane and McCaffrey developing. That 6th guy may need to be more ready to play, or maybe not if Lane and/or McCaffrey become competent NFL depth (or more) alongside both having prominent ST’s roles.
 
Love a developmental guy with tools, but there does come a point where you can only have so many of them on a competitive roster. I’m not sure we’re at that point, but it’s worth wondering. Consensus seems to be that we need at least two new starting WR’s to go alongside Terry (FA or draft), let’s say two to keep it simple. And then we have Lane and McCaffrey developing. That 6th guy may need to be more ready to play, or maybe not if Lane and/or McCaffrey become competent NFL depth (or more) alongside both having prominent ST’s roles.


I didnt say this dude was the answer, i'm simply trying to stimulate conversation about players who we could / should take on day 3. This guy intrigues me. He may get drafted and be 5th on the depth chart, but he's worth looking at as a day 3 pick.
 
I didnt say this dude was the answer, i'm simply trying to stimulate conversation about players who we could / should take on day 3. This guy intrigues me. He may get drafted and be 5th on the depth chart, but he's worth looking at as a day 3 pick.

I get that, it’s a good topic of discussion and he’s only a guy I had seen mentioned in passing as a sleeper for dynasty fantasy thus far. My contribution to the discussion was just a roster philosophy question, if we’re committed to developing two previous project WR’s, can we fit one more without risking exposing the last one to the Practice Squad? I think if our top-3 WR’s aren’t obvious health risks then we probably can risk one more. And it would be good to have more long term competition for all the developing young WR’s.

So seems like a realistic potential target
 
Love a developmental guy with tools, but there does come a point where you can only have so many of them on a competitive roster. I’m not sure we’re at that point, but it’s worth wondering. Consensus seems to be that we need at least two new starting WR’s to go alongside Terry (FA or draft), let’s say two to keep it simple. And then we have Lane and McCaffrey developing. That 6th guy may need to be more ready to play, or maybe not if Lane and/or McCaffrey become competent NFL depth (or more) alongside both having prominent ST’s roles.

Conn If LMC comes into camp next year not having made real progress in pure WR skills, I want him cut. I wouldn’t use a 5th on a WR but if there is an interesting prospect we can take with the 2nd 6th or the 7th, I’d be open to taking him to compete for a spot or at least start on PS
 
Conn If LMC comes into camp next year not having made real progress in pure WR skills, I want him cut. I wouldn’t use a 5th on a WR but if there is an interesting prospect we can take with the 2nd 6th or the 7th, I’d be open to taking him to compete for a spot or at least start on PS

Luke McCaffrey has shown me he’s worth a roster spot. He’s a good kick returner and was solid in his offensive reps this year. He put up 203 yards in eight games, which isn’t eye-popping, but it’s steady production in limited opportunities. Last year he was still more of a WR5 on a strong depth chart than the WR2 or WR3 people hope he becomes — but most teams keep six receivers, and by all accounts he’s one of the hardest workers on the roster. It’s also worth remembering he only played two years of receiver in college after converting from quarterback. He’s still relatively new to the position. Realistically, I don’t see the elite physical traits that would make him a true stud, whether here or elsewhere. But I do think there’s a decent chance he develops into a solid WR3 — the caliber of an Olamide Zaccheaus type. That jump could happen this year or next. Either way, I’d give him his full rookie contract to see what he becomes. After two seasons, I was impatient with Dyami Brown too. Honestly, I thought Dyami looked worse than McCaffrey did in his first couple of years when he actually saw the field. Then in Year 4 he turned into a useful WR3 and signed a $10 million deal somewhere else. Development isn’t always linear, especially at receiver. I think McCaffrey has earned the time to find out what he can become.
 
Luke McCaffrey has shown me he’s worth a roster spot. He’s a good kick returner and was solid in his offensive reps this year. He put up 203 yards in eight games, which isn’t eye-popping, but it’s steady production in limited opportunities. Last year he was still more of a WR5 on a strong depth chart than the WR2 or WR3 people hope he becomes — but most teams keep six receivers, and by all accounts he’s one of the hardest workers on the roster. It’s also worth remembering he only played two years of receiver in college after converting from quarterback. He’s still relatively new to the position. Realistically, I don’t see the elite physical traits that would make him a true stud, whether here or elsewhere. But I do think there’s a decent chance he develops into a solid WR3 — the caliber of an Olamide Zaccheaus type. That jump could happen this year or next. Either way, I’d give him his full rookie contract to see what he becomes. After two seasons, I was impatient with Dyami Brown too. Honestly, I thought Dyami looked worse than McCaffrey did in his first couple of years when he actually saw the field. Then in Year 4 he turned into a useful WR3 and signed a $10 million deal somewhere else. Development isn’t always linear, especially at receiver. I think McCaffrey has earned the time to find out what he can become.

I would give McCaffrey one more season, but I also want to play a little devil's advocate. In the recent pod, I made some comments about Washington as a franchise, criticizing them for holding onto players too long and being afraid to cut bait when players don't produce (in the way New England and the Eagles do). That has changed a bit with the new regime (they moved on from Chase Young as was mentioned, and more recently Emmanuel Forbes). But mostly, so far, they've moved on from guys Ron Rivera brought in.

You mention Dyami Brown. While I think it's fair to criticize Peters for not re-signing Brown and Zaccheus without a good plan to upgrade, Brown did nothing in Jacksonville. He actually regressed from what he did here, which is hard to do. I'm not sure he's the example for patience we want to use. I like McCaffrey - he is still learning the position. While that's true, his inexperience was a reason we may have gotten too cute drafting him where we did. Perceived ceiling and actual ceiling are two different things. It's great he's a 'hard worker' but that doesn't mean he is an NFL WR of any consequence. I hope he will be, but he needs to show major strides in 2026. I don't think he's good enough as a return guy to justify a long-term roster spot if he is going to be a 20 reception/season type of WR which is what he was headed for in 2025 before he got hurt.
 
I would give McCaffrey one more season, but I also want to play a little devil's advocate. In the recent pod, I made some comments about Washington as a franchise, criticizing them for holding onto players too long and being afraid to cut bait when players don't produce (in the way New England and the Eagles do). That has changed a bit with the new regime (they moved on from Chase Young as was mentioned, and more recently Emmanuel Forbes). But mostly, so far, they've moved on from guys Ron Rivera brought in.

You mention Dyami Brown. While I think it's fair to criticize Peters for not re-signing Brown and Zaccheus without a good plan to upgrade, Brown did nothing in Jacksonville. He actually regressed from what he did here, which is hard to do. I'm not sure he's the example for patience we want to use. I like McCaffrey - he is still learning the position. While that's true, his inexperience was a reason we may have gotten too cute drafting him where we did. Perceived ceiling and actual ceiling are two different things. It's great he's a 'hard worker' but that doesn't mean he is an NFL WR of any consequence. I hope he will be, but he needs to show major strides in 2026. I don't think he's good enough as a return guy to justify a long-term roster spot if he is going to be a 20 reception/season type of WR which is what he was headed for in 2025 before he got hurt.

I get the concern. I don’t disagree with the broader philosophical point about not being sentimental. The old Washington absolutely kept guys around two years too long because of draft capital or “potential.” The good franchises—New England in their prime, Philly now—are ruthless about value and timelines. But here’s my pushback: what exactly are you replacing him with? If you move on from Luke after two seasons, who fills that WR4/WR5 developmental slot? A 5th-round rookie who is even more raw and whom you’ll also need two years to evaluate? Then what—cut him after Year 2 because he hasn’t broken out? That becomes churn for the sake of churn. You’re not upgrading; you’re resetting the development clock. Or do you replace him with a journeyman like Dyami Brown? Slightly more expensive, known quantity, probably closer to his ceiling. But that’s a lateral move at best. You’re swapping a cost-controlled, still-ascending player for a capped-out rotational guy. That’s not how you build sustainable depth.

The metaphor I’d use is running an office. You can’t fire every “average” employee because they aren’t rainmakers. If you do that, you create instability and institutional amnesia. Not everyone is going to be a partner, but you still need reliable associates—people who understand the system, do their job, and improve incrementally. The key isn’t eliminating average workers; it’s distinguishing between the stagnant ones and the growth-oriented ones. Who studies the playbook? Who adds avlue on special teams? Who takes coaching? Who blocks? Who shows up on special teams? Who fits the culture? Luke’s case is about trajectory, not just production. He’s still new to the position. That doesn’t guarantee anything—but it does change the evaluation window. If in 2027 he’s still a 20-catch guy with no separation growth and remains mainly just a decent special teamer-- fine—move on after his rookie contract But cutting bait now risks becoming the very thing we criticize: reactive rather than strategic. Roster building isn’t just about stars. It’s about cost efficiency, development pipelines, and culture continuity. You don’t want to become the franchise that either hoards underperformers forever or cycles through mid-tier talent so aggressively that no one has time to actually develop.
 
I like all of that. Like I said, mostly just playing Devil's advocate. I think what keeps me (for the moment) somewhat more invested in Luke is that he has shown growth albeit it incremental. I don't buy as much into the 'developmental' aspect as you do - because ideally, you have WRs 1-6 who can flat out play, not 'projects' you hope someday will be able to. But the WR cabinet is currently so bare behind McLaurin that our franchise bar is lower than it should be.

Personally, I think the entire WR room needs a major talent infusion and I've said a lot on that front so won't regurgitate it here. I do think 2026 is a huge year for McCaffrey because the previous lack of experience factor can only go so far. It's his 3rd year in the league. It's time to show he can play his primary position at a level justifying his roster spot. If there is a healthy Jayden under center, there are no more excuses or caveats. The 'minimum' bar for him in 2026 is 30-40 receptions. Short of that, he's just a role player and glorified special teamer.

Now back to the Draft day 3 conversation :)
 
I'd agree with the thought I'd be somewhat surprised if they took a WR in day 3 but it would track with Peters lack of ambition for that spot. If he falls that far, Antonio Williams, high floor WR. He has some of the same attributes I mentioned for Bernard in the past. Crisp route runner, good hands, doesn't drop the ball. Nothing spectacular but very solid.

 
Everything I have heard on podcasts about Antonio Williams is good. Realistically I think we would have to take him at 71 or pick up additional drafts picks between 71 and 5th round pick (which I think is pick 145 or 146) because I doubt he makes to that 5th round pick. That blurb says he has inside outside versatility but most of the talk I have heard about him is in the slot. For me he is in that tier 3 of WR's which is essentially WR's 7 to around 20. That twitter post said he is consensus WR 13. In order for him to fall to our 5th round pick teams would likely need to see him as slot as slot only which would likely somewhat depress his stock value and even then he would likely get picked in the fourth round. I see him as more of a target if we say traded down and picked up some extra picks including one in the third round range.
 
Everything I am hearing is that this WR class is absolutely stacked. It wouldn’t surprise me if they find a guy with their 5th who is better than both Lane and LMC as a prospect.

Although we took Lane in rd 4 and LMC in rd 3, let’s not forget the consensus boards had these guys as rd 5-6 type of picks themselves.
 
Everything I am hearing is that this WR class is absolutely stacked. It wouldn’t surprise me if they find a guy with their 5th who is better than both Lane and LMC as a prospect.

Although we took Lane in rd 4 and LMC in rd 3, let’s not forget the consensus boards had these guys as rd 5-6 type of picks themselves.

It is a deep WR class. The top is not particularly stacked. There are maybe 6 or 7 guys with first round potential (Tate, Lemon, Tyson, Boston, Concepcion, Cooper), but there is another 15 guys or so with top round potential and then there are like 15 more guys who seem like solid day 3 guys and there are likely some solid day 3 guys I am not even really aware of yet.

I do think we took LMC before his consensus, but I think we took Lane within his consensus range. I think he was viewed as a relatively early day 3 guy (4th or 5th round) and we took him late in the fourth (it was Houston's fourth round pick) which is almost the middle of his range. With this deeper class this year though, you may be able to get a prospect of Lane's caliber late in teh 5th round by contrast, but I doubt you are getting an obviously better prospect than Lane in the 5th or 6th round. That is not to say they wouldn't turn out better, simply they wouldn't be an obviously better prospect.
 
It is a deep WR class. The top is not particularly stacked. There are maybe 6 or 7 guys with first round potential (Tate, Lemon, Tyson, Boston, Concepcion, Cooper), but there is another 15 guys or so with top round potential and then there are like 15 more guys who seem like solid day 3 guys and there are likely some solid day 3 guys I am not even really aware of yet.

I do think we took LMC before his consensus, but I think we took Lane within his consensus range. I think he was viewed as a relatively early day 3 guy (4th or 5th round) and we took him late in the fourth (it was Houston's fourth round pick) which is almost the middle of his range. With this deeper class this year though, you may be able to get a prospect of Lane's caliber late in teh 5th round by contrast, but I doubt you are getting an obviously better prospect than Lane in the 5th or 6th round. That is not to say they wouldn't turn out better, simply they wouldn't be an obviously better prospect.

5th round value for Lane per consensus


My point on LMC is we should consider taking a receiver Day 3. The challenge is there are only so many raw receivers we should be carrying so it becomes something of a numbers game (save for training camp injuries).

I’m keeping Lane over LMC because he’s shown me more
 


Always important to remember with project WR’s: don’t get seduced by pure athleticism if the rest isn’t there yet. It never will be.
 
I watched Gracen Halton against Alabama and Missouri. He’s mostly what you’d expect from a smaller defensive tackle — a good interior pass rusher with quickness and twitch, but someone who will get displaced against double teams and down blocks.

Pass Rush: Halton’s bread and butter is a rip move to the interior shoulder of the offensive lineman, followed by getting skinny through the gap. That move accounted for probably 80% of his wins in the two games I watched, and it’s legitimately effective. His hips are flexible enough that he can reduce his surface area and continue upfield once he clears. He also flashes a decent arm-over, though he can get high with it. When he does, even slight contact can kill the move. I saw him attempt a spin as well, but it’s not yet a consistent part of his arsenal. He doesn’t generate much speed-to-power. Even when he does get some push, he’s late to counter. The counter needs to come as the lineman is anchoring — instead, he tends to wait until after the rep has already stalled. That sequencing has to improve. He’s twitchy and explosive, but not especially bendy turning the corner, and his ankles look a bit stiff. He’s more linear and vertical than lateral. There isn’t a ton of side-to-side quickness. Still, that rip-and-skinny combination is real, and it works. Overall, he’s a good interior pass rusher right now. The go-to move is there. He just needs more counters and better timing.

Run Defense: He actually plays with decent leverage. He has natural knee bend and can hold up one-on-one. On single blocks, he can stack a bit and even flash some two-gap ability. But against double teams or down blocks, he’s going to get moved. The anchor just isn’t there. You can run at him. That said, his motor is good. Similar to Akeem Mesidor, even when he gets displaced, he fights to disengage and get back into the play. So his run defense isn’t bad — it’s just not sturdy. He does some things well in specific run concepts. Against outside zone, he’s disciplined — playing the back hip of the last offensive lineman to take away the cutback or force the run wide. Against inside runs, he’s at his best when shooting gaps. He can get small, use his flexible hips, knife through the line, and create backfield penetration. At the NFL level, he probably won’t be a consistently strong run defender because of the anchor limitations. But his effort and penetration ability mean he shouldn’t be a total liability either.

Overall: If we’re running a three-man front, I’m not sure what his ideal role is. Maybe a 4i, but the anchor isn’t ideal for that spot. He feels more like a 4-3 defensive tackle — someone who can attack gaps and rush the passer from the interior.
For the Commanders’ odd front, I’m not sure the fit is clean. I do think he’s an NFL rotation player. Early in his career, probably more of a passing-down rotational piece. Long term, maybe a rotation player on all downs. I’d put him in the fifth-round range, though I wouldn’t be shocked if he went a round earlier or later. Good player, just not a perfect scheme fit for an odd front that requires more anchor from its interior defenders.

Here is the first one fourth to one third of the video I watched...
 
As a Nebraska fan, 2 day 3 options;

RB Emmett Johnson
CB Ceyair Wright
 
As a Nebraska fan, 2 day 3 options;

RB Emmett Johnson
CB Ceyair Wright
I really like Emmett Johnson. I actually think he’s a top back in the draft. Obviously a bit below Love, but a really good back.
 
Johnson impressed during the season and showed up bigger than most players at the Senior Bowl. I wish he was better in pass pro but I really like him as well
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 3, Members: 0, Guests: 3)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top