So, I hear you and generally agree, I just don’t lean too much into a “younger for the sake of getting younger” mentality. If, say, we sign Likely but he gets hurt… is Sinnott a better choice to be our starting F over Ertz?
Of course, that’s also why I mentioned Blough still giving Sinnnott/Yankoff chances (even if we do re-sign Ertz as a backup), though that should be at least partially dependent on how they look this offseason - I want them, or some other depth guy we bring in, to have that opportunity to shine as you said.
With that said, I’d still much prefer a younger guy with upside fill that role. I’m just saying if we don’t land a guy like that (or we do but they get hurt or struggle throughout the offseason), Ertz might not be a bad insurance policy.