No lanky you are completely wrong, your post is so filled with misinformation and half truth that you obviously dont have even an inkling of whats gone on here, given that you have shown yourself capable of thought in other threads im going to assume you just bought into the media driven BS on this.
Media-driven BS? Please tell me what part of my post is factually inaccurate.
the problem that you and about 80% of the fan base and even a large percentage of coaches have is that just because someone physically meets the prereqs to be a nosetackle or OLB or whatever, DOESNT MEAN THEY CAN PLAY THE POSITION. pHYSICALLY AH LOOKS LIKE A PROTOTYPE NT BUT HIS SKILLSET IS A DIRECT OPPOSITE OF WHAT A NT DOES ON A DOWN BY DOWN BASIS.
No need to shout - I never once said any of this. I simply said he should play where expected to play, especially when he says he's on board to collect a $21M bonus. Whether or not he's being misused is another topic altogether, and I don't necessarily disagree. Doesn't mean he is justified in his actions.
The easiest way for me to explain this is to use an offencive comparison, you are the coach, you have antonio gates and tony gonzales at TE, rather than throwing to them you decide that both of them are good size TEs so they will now become primarily blockers. its the same thing as asking a penetrating disrutpter type to set the edge or hold the POA rather than doing what he does best. hes still a DT but now he is doing something outside his skillset, some guys can most cannot.
Tony Gonzalez and Antonio Gates are both expected to block, and have been their entire careers. If they weren't, they wouldn't have been nearly as successful, b/c teams would immediately know it was a pass play when they were out there. Most TEs/WRs are expected to run, block, and tackle, as most are also used on special teams (not Gonzo and Gates, obvs -
maybe early in their careers).
I know this, because its happened to me, we got a new coach who looked and saw a 6-5 guy who weighed 330 pounds and who played college basketball, he immediately decided to build a 3-4 defence around me, I told him to watch film on me , im not a mauler, I dont do well at two gapping , my best moves are swims, rip to swims and spins, none of which translate well to playing inside in a gap control system. Im a pretty strong guy but my strength comes from my legs, and im not a guy who benched 225 40 times but I could bench 370 pounds 3-4 times. I knew my limitations. IM also fragile, like most very large people, I have bad ankles (they are thin compared to the rest of me lol) but I found I coupld protect myself inside by simply being quick off the ball because I wouldnt be standing still reading the play id be attacking and its harder to get into my legs if im on the move.
long story short I went from being our teams dmvp and the lineman of the year for the league to being a solid player who managed to play only a couple games before getting injured, our defence collapsed and went from being a top ranked unit to being near the bottom of the league. So I saw a lot of parralells between my situation in 2000 and alberts last year.
No offense to you, Ryman, but your personal experiences on the football field are irrelevant to the Albert Haynesworth situation, except to provide rationale as to why you support the POS.
It is his fault he didnt get it in writing
Right, so I am correct. It was not in writing. End of discussion.
2- on this you are completely incorrect outright wrong. the 21million dollar payment was Alberts the minute he signed the dotted line, it was disguised as a roster bonus to help us beat the cap, this is known. therefore we screwed up when the team decided to use money he had already earned to negotiate with him. we could avoided the payment only if we cut him, even had we traded him the money would have been due. you are buying the media spin on that and its wrong.
"Disguised" as a roster bonus? Not really sure what you mean here - if we cut him, he didn't get the money; that's no disguise, it actually
IS a roster bonus. That's what a roster bonus is. Shanahan sat him down, asked him if he was cool with switching to the 3-4 and playing NT, and he outright lied to the coach's face. We didn't cut him, and he kept the money. If he had said "no, I don't want to play 3-4 b/c I'm not the right fit," we would have cut him, and he would not have passed go and collected his $200.
3- I never said money wasnt A motivation I said it wasnt the only motivation. yes we offered one of the best packages, but tampa and the gnats also offered solid packages. he chose us because we already had a good defence (funny eh?) and because we ran a defence that he could excel in if used correctly.
He could have excelled in either NY or Tampa or obviously if he stayed in Tennessee. So what was the final deciding factor? THE MONEY.
truth be told im often shocked at how often fans take the media at their word let alone how many people jumped on the AH hatewagon.
Is he an idiot and not always the best person? yes and he needs to get a clue about being a decent human being , but he was not entirely at fault here.
Still not sure what I've taken the media's word on, other than the "disguised" mystery roster bonus that's actually not a roster bonus...I'd love for you to enlighten me.