Much better FA class at OL, DL and edge than RB though. I expect us to address those areas in FA.
While you are probably right about available FA Talent, I think the core philosophy for AP is to build primarily through the draft, and put the finishing touches in FA. When you make a bunch of 1-year FA contracts, you are probably hoping to chip away and replace many of those 1-years with dudes you *draft* - now you are looking at Fowler, Allen...those are some big shoes to fill, but if you make the right moves it could be a huge step forward for years at *value*. You think FA for those two + OL help and other places? I just think with the predilection towards drafting, the amount of needs on lines, and the history with RB by AP teams of the past, my money would be on late-round RB.
It's fluid, though - the other thing is, I am assuming that he won't be thrilled with the kinds of contracts most of the FAs will want. I think if a premiere LT or Myles Garrett level dude is legitimately available in FA, YES, I do think they go after that. Those are truly moving the needle significantly. I am not sure those are out there this year, and I think they are looking to get someone for at least two of *Fowler*, *Allen*, and *OL* ultimately with drafted talent.
I think they do a lot of BPA though, so... I guess it'll be really, really fluid. If they want player-X and they think he survives a few more picks, the trade down attempt, or the trade-up if they don't think he survives, etc etc. After reaching an NFCCG you may think it's a "trade up" year but the Comms had a lot of 1-year contracts, so I think this isn't a typical situation potentially. I think they look at BPA with emphasis on trade-downs for more picks and not trading up and chasing. Too many holes, but hopefully next year that will not be the case.