Josh Harris Speaks... Commanders is permanent name.

Like I said--no one holds onto Snyder's memory more than the anti-name crowd.
I hear you. And I get trying to denigrate people who are anti-name with the whole <insert laughing Nelson .gif> "ha-ha, you think about Dan" schtick.

But here's the thing...as much as i dont care for it, i get that "Commanders" is the here, now, and future. At the same time, what I just don't get trying to shut down any rational conversation about its, and Dan's, place in the history of the franchise.

The simple fact that Commies has the baggage of being the fruit of Dan's supple mind will always make it fodder for debate and conversation among fans of a few generations. And, that it can get a little snippy here and there i think just speaks to the baggage it brings maybe being a bit toxic.
 
The simple fact that Commies has the baggage of being the fruit of Dan's supple mind will always make it fodder for debate and conversation among fans of a few generations. And, that it can get a little snippy here and there i think just speaks to the baggage it brings maybe being a bit toxic.
Again, this is for you. Don't speak for me or other fans.
 
I have come to accept the name. However, I am sorry gentlemen, but the white jerseys are vile abominations and the black jerseys are a "I bought my Steelers jersey on Temu," jersey.

This is a hill I will die on. :D

The white jerseys definitely need altered in my opinion. I’d prefer the old white style we had.

The black jersey…that’s going to be a tougher sell to get rid of. The only people saying it looks like the Steelers are some of the old fans. In truth, the only thing they have in common is that their base color is black. Nothing else about them looks the same. The black jerseys I think are here to stay, but they may be altered. Honestly, I wonder if that isn’t the best selling version of our jersey at the moment.
 
We need a jersey / pants thread apparently. Somebody want to start one?
 
This jersey looks nothing like

IMG_6514.jpeg
 
I wonder if that isn’t the best selling version of our jersey at the moment.

Fanatics and the Team Store could not keep the black JD5 on the shelves. I think the black McLaurin was very popular too.
 
I'm sure we'll always find something to complain about in respect of the name but I think this all goes away with time: think of how many professional sports teams have completely forgettable nicknames - Rangers(!), Angels, Pirates - these are all objectively super generic but time and ongoing association has diminished our sense of that IMO. And also, more continued success. If the team keeps performing, the last thing we'll be worried about is the name.
Actually, the Texas Rangers is a decidedly Texas name. Here's a link to some historical information about them: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Texas-Rangers-United-States-military-forces

And I think the Angels has reference to Los Angeles (which in Spanish means, "The Angels").

As for Pirates, a quick search says that it was a name they chose when they "pirated" players from other teams using questionable practices.

My main issue with "Commanders" is that it is generic and not a name that is obviously related to D.C. and/or the DMV. I've mentioned this lack of specificity in many posts I've written regarding the name. I think team names should be directly related to the city/region in which they're located. "Commanders" was originally the name of an Alliance of American Football team based in San Antonio. The name is presumably a reference to the battle of the Alamo at which, I suppose, there were some commanders.

I guess one could argue that "Commanders" as attached to D.C. refers to lawmakers and military officers (more so the latter) who work in the district. It's never been explained or fleshed out (there's no logo, only a font).

But Washington, D.C. is a city rich with potential names which would be references to its uniqueness. That is one of the main issues I have with "Commanders". It's generic. It inspires no pride in its city/region.

For many this seems to make no difference. Even those who want "Redskins" want the name in large part because it's traditional, not because it is specifically related to D.C./The DMV.

That's my issue. It's not that Dan Snyder was behind it, it's that it's lazy, ill-conceived and has very little to do with the area.

Winning football games would be even better with a better name.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, but the DC-centric names are all problematic. Do you really want

The Washington Revenuers
The Washington Obstructionists
The Washington Lobbyists
The Washington Conservatives
The Washington Liberals
The Washington Pokers
The Washington Mindyourownbusinesses
The Washington Marchers
The Washington Murderers
The Washington Congestion
The Washington Fillibusters

Do you really want a Washington-based name? Do you?
 
The Washington Red Tapers
The Washington Wasters
The Washington Subcontractors
The Washington Inefficiency
The Washington Controversy
The Washington Funk

Makes Commanders look pretty good, doesn't it?
 
Washington Belters! (Legitimate option at one time)
Heh! I'd have gone with the Washington Bettors just to make Vegas happy. Might start getting some ref love.
 
Heh! I'd have gone with the Washington Bettors just to make Vegas happy. Might start getting some ref love.
I'd still want to beat Shawn Hochuli with a really big stick.
 
The Washington Duplicates
The Washington Triplicates
The Washington We'll transfer You Nows
 
I'd still want to beat Shawn Hochuli with a really big stick.
I think iheartskins wasn't off base when he was talking about Oppenheimer. I think Hochuli deserves to get a really close look at an atom bomb testing site.
 
Again, this is for you. Don't speak for me or other fans.
Homie, I'm just speaking facts 😆

If you've convinced yourself Dan didn't create the brand that is Commanders...that's literally an alternate reality you're living in.
 
I’m really surprised that some people don’t see how the name Commanders ties into the Nation’s Capital.


“Commander”

“noun​

  1. a person who commands.
  2. a person who exercises authority; chief officer; leader.
  3. the commissioned officer in command of a military unit.
  4. U.S. Navy. an officer ranking below a captain and above a lieutenant commander.
  5. a police officer in charge of a precinct or other unit.
  6. the chief officer of a commandery in the medieval orders of Knights Hospitalers, Knights Templars, and others.
  7. a member of one of the higher classes or ranks in certain modern fraternal orders, as in the Knights Templars.”
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top