burgold
Super Bowl MVP
Staff member
BGO Ownership Group
Joe Gibbs Club Member
2nd Monthly Contributor
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2011
- Messages
- 8,145
- Reaction score
- 6,785
- Points
- 643
What I think you're doing is singing to the choir about why the name should never have been changed. I'd guess if you polled the board you'd get close to 100% agreement on that. I don't believe the name is viewed as offensive by those who should be impacted by it. At least I've never seen significant evidence of it. Like you, I've seen more hard evidence that the NA populations either supported the name or were neutral on it.
But despite our muskets and pitchforks, those days are bygone. A new team name/brand will almost certainly not be NA themed. So, if we're looking to capture or recapture that population in New Mexico, Arizona, and South Dakota, I think the ring is going to do more than the brand.
But despite our muskets and pitchforks, those days are bygone. A new team name/brand will almost certainly not be NA themed. So, if we're looking to capture or recapture that population in New Mexico, Arizona, and South Dakota, I think the ring is going to do more than the brand.




