As in the stock market, it's not enough to have identified a quality company. You have to be able to acquire shares of it at a reasonable price (with the expectation of future appreciation).
Unfortunately, the team missed the boat in 2015 and early 2016 on getting Kirk a contract that would reflect the quarterback he is.
Now, you run into the situation of saying to yourself 'well, he's an above average quarterback, so I suppose we are going to have to pay him a top 3-5 salary just to keep him here.'
IMO, that is the WRONG strategy.
You are already seeing the effects of the Flacco contract on the Ravens.
He's not an elite quarterback either. But he had one outsized sample in the 2011 postseason and so got paid.
But as with Mark Rypien, the team was essentially paying him afterward for what he already did for the organization.
But from a cap standpoint that contract was a killer for them.
If Kirk were Carson Wentz or Derek Carr then I think you would see the checkbook out because the game-changing talent and poise would be there on display early on for everyone to see.
But right now it's arguable that Cousins is the third best quarterback in the NFC East. Perhaps second.
But Wentz and Prescott are on rookie deals and are cheap so the teams can assemble a talented roster around them.
Manning is 37 and 2017 with the free agents on defense added in 2016 was really supposed to be his last hurrah to try and win before the rebuild is coming in NY.
Based on what I am seeing now, I would not break the bank to give Cousins a landmark contract.
You can give that kind of deal to a Rodgers or Brady because they can make solid but unspectactular running backs and receivers into a top 3-5 offense and win in the postseason with them.
I don't think anyone thinks Cousins fits in that category, nor may he fit into the next category right now which is Wentz, Carr, and further down guys like Matt Stafford and Philip Rivers.
I think you pull a Houston and go into the draft and take a quarterback and develop him. And in this league 'develop' means getting him on the field in Year 1 and starting to try and win something in Year 2.
And from what I am reading the 2018 draft class is going to have several quarterbacks available when the Redskins pick in the teens to early twenties in Round 1 that are better prospects than DeShaun Watson was in 2017.
With the extra money under the cap the Redskins are then still alive in free agency to go out and get that edge rusher they still need as I don't think Galette has it anymore as a top threat after missing 2 plus seasons. Kerrigan has always been a guy that depends upon another rusher to set him up for the one-on-one bull rush to get to the quarterback. But he is not going to scare offenses by himself the way a Von Miller or Vic Beasley is able to do.
We also need help at the skill positions on offense. We don't have a frontline running back. That seems obvious. We don't have a
#1 receiver or even a
#1 A like Garcon was. Right now the only thing putting Josh Doctson on the field is his former draft status.
With his penchant for dropping balls so far this year if he were in New England he would be back on the bench not bucking for more playing time.
So, overall a move at quarterback to go younger is IMO a smart move.
It gives us that extra year to continue to build around him and stay below the cap ceiling in case another Josh Norman/franchise player becomes available.
And to the question of what about our current team?
We have a team that is composed of mostly younger players or veterans who are still in their maneuverable primes.
Scherff, Moses, Long, Allen, Fuller, Dunbar, Nicholson, Swearinger, Reed, Ioannidis, Breeland (if resigned), etc. are all younger core players that can grown with a new quarterback.
Veterans like Trent Williams (29), Josh Norman (30), Ryan Kerrigan (28), Zach Brown (27 - if resigned) will still be more than serviceable players for that transition period and likely beyond it.
The Cowboys lucked into Prescott, the Eagles went after Wentz aggressively, the Seahawks bided their time and took Wilson in Round 3 just as other teams were also thinking of investing a pick in him at that point of the draft. The Raiders got a steal in grabbing Carr where they did.
But the one advantage these teams had is their path to these quarterbacks was not already blocked by a huge investment in a younger quarterback who was already supposed to be the face of the franchise.
Here, Cousins didn't look like he was going to be a starting NFL quarterback until 2015, in his fourth year because he was largely sitting on the bench while the team found out that Griffin couldn't play and finally admitted it.
It's an opportunity lost and we can't go back and reset the clock.
But let's not compound the mistake by saying we can make it 'all good' right now by overpaying Cousins for what we didn't think he could do back in 2012, 2013 and 2014.