I like the philosophical approach. Think that way myself at times. Here's the problem (when I argue with myself!): today's NFL is about 2-4 year sprints. a whole team is never really built. you find your franchise QB and everyone else is…in some respects…a placeholder for the next guy. so the trick, for that 2-4 year period…is to have a sufficiently high overall level of talent that really, really plays as a team. with the cap (i.e., intentional leveling)….there really is no dominance. the winners are the ones who find talent and replace talent….within a system. I know…nothing new here. but us older farts know the difference - the Steel curtain dominated for a long time. that can not happen under the current construct.
Agreed, but look at the teams that have been successful. Since 2000
GB (1 SB - 10') - Mike McCarthy - 2006-Present
NE (3 SB - 01' 03' 04') - Bill Belechick - 2000 - Present
NYG (2 SB - 07' 11') - Tom Coughlin - 2004 - Present
NO (1 SB - 09') - Sean Payton - 2006 - Present
Balt (1 SB - 12') - John Harbaugh - 2008 - Present
Balt (1 SB - 00') - Brian Billick - 1999-2007
Indy (1 SB - 06') - Tony Dungy - 2002 - 2008
TB (1 SB - 02') - John Gruden - 2002 - 2008
More then half those guys were in position at least 3 years before they hit paydirt. A few of them got there fast, but fizzled out afterwards, and Bill Bellichick was the only one to win multiples, after winning it his first season.




