WUSA: The Redskins Real Problem: Their Wide Receivcers

I have no idea why this would make your month. It would do nothing to solve the O line problems which is at the heart of our offensive woes. I personally think the WR corp we have is more than sufficient (given our other desperate needs), if we're going to lose picks in a deal then give me a lineman.
 
Did a terrible O-line keep the Packers from winning the Superbowl?

I'm doing my part.....

@AdamSchefter Adam, any chance of the Skins making a move with a 2nd for Josh Gordon today? It would make my month.

@AdamSchefter Please pick up the phone and call Mike for us. Pierre was a great grab, this is another.

:)
 
You're actually comparing the Packers SB O line to this current squad's?


Seriously?

The Green Bay SB o-line that gave up 36 sacks, and provided little running game?

Versus our o-line that gave up 30 sacks last year, with a great running game?

What's the question?
 
Sorry, McD - looks like the Browns have not fielded any calls about Gordon as of late, because nobody is matching the asking price. Unless the Redskins have the best offer on the table and they choose to accept that...looks like Josh is staying in Cleveland (poor bastage).
 
Instead of Carolina, how about he comes to DC and makes us an immediate playoff contender? Or even if he's not enough to push us over the top this year, how about for the next five years?

You could add Calvin Johnson and Jerry Rice in his prime and our QB still fails to get them the ball because he doesn't even know they are open or hes too busy peeling himself out of the grass.
 
Depressing. Like Aqib Talib, this one hurts.

New John Keim article out, for anyone who still believes we have even below average receivers, let alone sufficient or decent receivers. And a few notes about our WR coaching issues:

Quick Takes: Washington Redskins receivers - ESPN

• Whether the blame is on the coaches or the players themselves, the Redskins have been hurt by the lack of development from Leonard Hankerson and Aldrick Robinson. Yes, we’re back to that again. Hankerson has improved in some areas, but he’s not a consistent threat, with just four catches in the last three games. The Redskins once thought he could be a solid No. 2 receiver. He’s not.

• The Redskins have only drafted four wide receivers since Mike Shanahan took over after the 2009 season. They’re on their third receivers coach. Of the four, one (Terrence Austin) was cut and another (Niles Paul) was moved to tight end. They have failed to develop a quality receiver; Robert Griffin III’s growth as a passer will help, but that will only help so much.

The Redskins are like a pitching staff in baseball that has a solid No. 1 starter, though not a Cy Young contender, and a bunch of No. 4’s, guys you can run out there who are capable of a good game but not a string of them.

• I’ll go back to another stat: The last wide receiver not named Garcon to surpass 85 yards receiving was Donte Stallworth in Week 14 of 2011.

• I have not talked to anyone about Lance Lewis, who remains on the practice squad. He was rather inconsistent this summer and did not look like a player ready to contribute at the NFL level.
 
That's all well and good... first off, nobody here says we have a world beating WR corps. Second, Jordan Reed is a receiver, and he just went for over 100 against Chicago.

The entire rebuttle to your whole point is that we have more pressing needs then WR.. PERIOD. You still think our O-Line is top 5? Griff cant get the ball to the WRs, so whoever is out there is not a primary concern. Jordan Reed is successful because he runs short to intermediate routes. You think Griff has time to find a receiver stretching the field? It's not possible. Your agenda is clear. Your opinion is clear. Josh Gordon is not coming to the Redskins.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top