Tech/Computer advice from me

T (or anyone else), can you help me with something? I have a 15 year old daughter who is looking to purchase her own laptop. She has saved all her money up for this, and I want to make sure we get her something that will last a while, perform well, but also withstand the rigors being a teenagers computer.

She has $500 to spend, but doesn't want to spend it all unless she needs to. She needs it to write papers with, do schoolwork on, surf the interwebz, iTunes, etc. I was thinking about one of those Chromebooks for $249 on Amazon, but was wondering what you have heard about those or if you have any other recommendations?
 
Last edited:
Let me do some looking. What is the timeline? Generally the longer you gave to look the better the deal you can find.
 
If you get the chance, take her to best buy and play with the chrome books that are on display. For what she's doing she should have no issues with one of those devices, but I've never used one and I'm a big believer in playing with things before dropping hundreds of dollars on an operating system you've never touched.

Don't be afraid to spend a good 30-45 minutes sitting there playing with it. Tell the sales guy to go kick rocks when they come to you. Don't let their desire to send you out the door with something screw with her figuring out if it's something she'd like.

Oh and don't let her get caught up in the new shiny toy and decide she wants it. Make her sleep on it :)
 
Oh, what's more important to her size wise? They make some really nice 12/13 inch laptops that are light and equal in performance (back in the day they lacked in performance because of what you could get that small, not anymore)

Smaller size is great for travel, but most importantly it gives you much more battery life. The screen is what kills majority of the battery and the difference in power consumption between a 13 and 15 inch laptop is quite a bit.
 
I've dealt with quite a few support lines for issues ranging across the board. So when I say what I'm about to say it's not just fluff.
I also provide support for a job, so I understand both sides of the relationship.

IBM is the worst ****ing server-line business support center I've ever had to deal with. People pay big money for next-day guarantees for replacement hardware and on-site techs to fix problems for a reason - because their servers are critical to their business.

You told me a tech would be out today - you're a major hardware manufacturer, one of the largest in the world. I took you at your word.

Now I have to explain to a client that because of a **** up on your end, the tech probably wont be out until tomorrow?! Are you ****ing kidding me?! If you had told me that yesterday I would have continued with my restore plans and they would have been up and running around mid-night last night. But you told me TODAY. So the client made a calculated decision based on cost and downtime - a decision that would not have been made if we knew you weren't going to fix it today.

Unbelievable.

So now I have a completely backwards restore plan in the works to get them up asap. Their bill is going to be outrageous. You should have to pay for it.

**** you IBM. I'll never recommend your servers to anyone.
 
Yeah, I'm glad I don't have to deal with servers or networks. It's all magic to me.

I feel safer in my DB/ETL world.
 
networking is my weak point, i'm trying to get better at it but i don't work on complicated enough systems often enough to really get a handle.

if IBM was a physical entity i'd beat it with a brick right now. i'm so pissed. restore is still going on. at best they're going to be down for 18 hours. absolutely inexcusable.

what sucks is no matter how little of it is my fault i'm still in the range of fire in terms of angry blame placing by the poor clients that thought by paying big bucks for support and equipment they were safeguarding against this.

there's a reason we only recommend HP systems.
 
i called IBM and flipped out. got routed to a customer service relations manager. 17 minutes later i received a call from a tech.

poor tech, he's going to catch a bunch of **** from the client when he shows up and it's in no way his fault. i tried to explain that, but i don't think it'll matter.

the worst thing is there's nothing i can apologize for. this is the fault of the previous IT company (we inherited this mess) and IBM. you'd think that would make you feel better but it doesn't. i can't even discount the charges because it's literally not our fault...
 
I've dealt with quite a few support lines for issues ranging across the board. So when I say what I'm about to say it's not just fluff.
I also provide support for a job, so I understand both sides of the relationship.

IBM is the worst ****ing server-line business support center I've ever had to deal with. People pay big money for next-day guarantees for replacement hardware and on-site techs to fix problems for a reason - because their servers are critical to their business.

You told me a tech would be out today - you're a major hardware manufacturer, one of the largest in the world. I took you at your word.

Now I have to explain to a client that because of a **** up on your end, the tech probably wont be out until tomorrow?! Are you ****ing kidding me?! If you had told me that yesterday I would have continued with my restore plans and they would have been up and running around mid-night last night. But you told me TODAY. So the client made a calculated decision based on cost and downtime - a decision that would not have been made if we knew you weren't going to fix it today.

Unbelievable.

So now I have a completely backwards restore plan in the works to get them up asap. Their bill is going to be outrageous. You should have to pay for it.

**** you IBM. I'll never recommend your servers to anyone.

is there a SLA or contract? it's not the servers - it's the customer service that is your target. that's what you should share if that is the source of the problem.

I take it yours is not a virtualized environment? Something to consider down the road if you can make the BCA stick.

sorry this happened to you. feel your pain.
 
is there a SLA or contract? it's not the servers - it's the customer service that is your target. that's what you should share if that is the source of the problem.

I take it yours is not a virtualized environment? Something to consider down the road if you can make the BCA stick.

sorry this happened to you. feel your pain.

Well, a system board went out on a server that's 18 months old. I've never heard of that except in cases of heat problems, maybe a power problem if you have crap UPS. So I'm not too thrilled with the hardware either.

The contract was next-day business support from IBM. If they had shown up today like they were supposed to I wouldn't have too much a gripe. Sure - they hung up on me 3 times during the service call (maybe my phone? never had that happen before, but who knows...), 2 of the 4 techs that answered the phone were not understandable (connection problem? accents? not intelligent? not sure...), but that crap happens. Hell, I'd even overlook faulty hardware that's less than 2 years old on $4500 server model, though I'd still be reluctant to ever recommend it unless there was a heck of a price incentive (which there isn't with IBM in general)

But they left my client out to dry when warranty support was paid for over a communications issue. They didn't even order the ****ing part until noon today. I opened the ticket with them yesterday at 11 AM and called them today at 9AM to check up, and the order for the part didn't get in until noon (the tech I called at 2 PM to raise a **** storm let that slip)?!

That's just unacceptable to me. If I had known that was possible I would have started the restore i just finished 10 minutes ago at 10 AM yesterday when I arrived on site and they would have lost 8 hours of uptime max. Instead we went for a recovery scenario that would be the least expensive for the client with minimal downtime, the problem was it banked on this server being up today. Something I would have never thought twice about before today... I've never had a problem with next-day warranty support, not even from Dell.

I'm sure I'm the .0001% of IBM warranty service calls, but unfortunately that's all it takes. I can never recommend their products to critical infrastructure ever again. Burn me once, **** you.

As for being virtualized... they got screwed on that setup. They have 2 servers, both virtualized, but running on two physical servers. So they are virtualized, but in a meaningless way. I'm not very familiar with vmware, so I went with the export option. I had to swap the drives so I could load up their vSphere utility and run an export - the only way to get it from one to the other. So both servers were down for that, because the server has to be offline to export.

An hour into it the export was 11% done. Theses are servers with 400 GB drives (small servers) that are less than half full. I had to bail because that was going to take way too long to have both servers down. So I put the critical server up and left the other down.

Had they been two physical boxes, like they should have been, I would have installed Hyper-v on the good box, spun up a virtual and restored from backup. They would have been up rather quickly. Hyper-v's import/export is significantly faster. I exported/imported 4 servers a few months ago, all of them larger than this, and I think it was a 2 1/2 hour job start to finish.

And no, the free version doesn't allow for backups of the actual VM's. It also doesn't allow for hardware monitoring. VM ware makes great products, but they're expensive, the free version is very basic. We're going to be making changes. We inherited this literally 3 months ago.

The people before us didn't know what they were doing, I think they were accustomed to bigger environments and tried to apply things that work in bigger environments to a small business. They even made them pay individually for all the products (instead of buying one of the MS small business packages.) I talked about that before. They probably paid around 12-16k (not including labor) for something that should have cost 6. And it's not even flexible.

Grant it, the vmware export should have been a reasonable approach. I'm not sure what caused it to take so long. I could have tried grabbing the underlying files through VMWare's CLI, but with no experience doing it I wasn't sure how it would turn out trying to put two data stores on the same box. I don't think there was enough room, but again I'm a novice with vmware.

I'm seriously sick to boot so that didn't help either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now for a good story. I meant to post this earlier but obviously I've been busy :)

I got my dad a Logitech Harmony 900 remote for Christmas. They just did a big addition to their house and had a whole entertainment center set up with the works. I went down for christmas and I set it up to run everything, including their battery operated candles :)

And 2 months later it started crapping out. Locking up, getting stuck in boot, etc. I wiped it, reinstalled it it would be fine for a week then do it again.

Finally decided to take it to logitech.

Turns out they don't make the 900 anymore.

So, after some back and forth and proving my claims were right and there was something wrong with the remote, they are sending my dad a new harmony ultimate that includes wireless, bluetooth, and RF (normally they just do IR.) Now my dad can control his lights, fans, and individual light bulbs (if they are phillips) with it. It's a $350 remote, the 900 i bought him was on sale for $200 but regularly $250, so it's a $150 upgrade in terms of cost.

And they rush-shipping it to him.

So there's a big two thumbs up to logitech for standing behind their products and giving my dad a big upgrade for his troubles. I have the harmony one, got my father in law to get one and set it up for him, and got my dad one. I love those remotes and definitely recommend them. If you want to literally only use 1 remote, the Harmony is a great product for it.

(ask for it for fathers day, trust me :) )
 
there's a reason we only recommend HP systems.

I hear ya. I've been working on HP stuff since 1980, started out on one of these:

2108A-37.jpg

That's an HP 21MX 16 bit, 4 register microprocessor with 16k of directly accessible memory and 32 k with an extended memory instruction set. You could key in programming info through those toggle switches on the front panel (but we only really used it to load the boot instructions). I programmed on it with Assembler.

Nowadays, I use an HP Elitebook workstation and it kicks arse.
 
Hah! that's one of those things professors would pass around class going 'Look at what we used to use' :)

I have an elitebook too. If the surface pro wasn't capable of doing everything I needed, a touchscreen, and super light weight my next workstation would be an elitebook.

But I'm going with the surface pro :)
 
Hah! that's one of those things professors would pass around class going 'Look at what we used to use' :)

I have an elitebook too. If the surface pro wasn't capable of doing everything I needed, a touchscreen, and super light weight my next workstation would be an elitebook.

But I'm going with the surface pro :)

geeks!

he said with admiration.
 
:)

you should have seen me in college fansince. you would have laughed. i was the only one out at the parties that answered 'what is your major?' with 'computer science'
the rest of the cs guys were playing madden tournaments.

they probably all graduated in 4 years too ;)
 
what happened to the tail end posts that were in this thread last night?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top