tshile
Guest
here's what's going on: the gov't is trying to achieve an objective by attacking a business' bottom line...it's that simple. however, the trademark registration - which is what this ruling is about - only confers some privileges...it doesn't undercut the Redskins ability to sue for trademark infringement. it boils to down to where it should have been in the forst place - let consumers vote with their dollars.
I just don't think it's going to matter, and they know it. That's why they seem to be on the 'force them to change' path.
Legal aspects of trademark law aside, pretending for a minute that the redskins have lost exclusive rights to the name (which is not the case - but lets pretend it is): The idea that everyone's going to up and start making "Redskins Stuff" to sell and that it's going to move the needle enough to cause a chance is kind of silly...
The big companies in the country that can compete with Nike from a manufacturing, marketing, and sales standpoint are not going to do this. They have too much at stake. They're not going to put their licensing of NFL products now, or in the future, at risk just so they can make some extra bucks selling unofficial Redskins gear.
The guys on the side of the road... well, they're already selling stuff. I have a hard time believing they're properly licensing the stuff they're selling... overseas sites... they're already doing it... at the end of the day their stuff is of lower quality and when you buy jerseys from overseas shops you pretty much accept it will have defects or otherwise not be an accurate replication of the licensed stuff.
So it seems to me like the net impact would be minor. At lease relative to what the pundits are proclaiming - as if this is some sort of huge victory.
I just hope Snyder sees it that way if they lose the appeals.







