I think it was pretty easy for the fans to be negative about the team and correct for 30 years, because the people running the team were pretty bad and the teams were pretty bad for basically 30 years. If you just bet on "they don't know what they're doing" you hit a whole lot more than you missed from 1993 - 2023.
There were a lot of roster questions in 2024 also. WR2 was a question, backup center was a question then also. A lot of folks questioned brining in so many veterans with injury concerns (Ertz, Ekler, etc.). And it worked out just fine. Now, there are some folks who are trying to retroactively say "easy schedule and Daniels was responsible for all of it" and downplaying the overall roster construction. But one way or another, the team made it to the NFC Championship game, and won 2 road playoff games.
So sometimes fans are right, sometimes they are not. Sometimes FOs are right, sometimes they are not.
Unpopular opinion (for reasons I don't quite understand) : we would have been in playoff contention last year if not for the ridiculous number of injuries.
- Starting QB for 10 games
- Starting RB for virtually the entire season (Ekler)
- Starting TE for more than half the season (Ertz)
- Starting WR for 8-9 games (McLaurin)
- WR2 for virtually the entire season (Noah Brown), + Deebo (whatever position he was) for a game plus several others limited, McCaffery for half the season, Lane for the end of the season. Every one of the projected WRs either ended up on IR or missed games.
- Every starting DE
- Backup QB for the end of the season
- Starting Safety for much of the season
... More than I can't think of off the top of my head.
There's no way to really overcome all of that. If they suffered average injuries, I think they could absolutely have won 10 or so games.
I'll hear you out that the roster was put together counting on some guys with injury history, the most notable was Noah Brown. That was an obvious mistake to count on a guy who gets injured a lot. But you can't say the same for every guy who got injured.
They were remarkably thin at certain positions in 2025, and some of us dumb fans were pointing it out all summer. Then, lo and behold, those exact positions blew up in their face. So they don't get much sympathy from me on that front. And even when Jayden played, they had a losing record. So no, I don't buy that they were a playoff team if only he'd stayed healthy. Quinn's actions acceded they weren't well coached. And they had stronger competition than 2024.
The season before was almost the polar opposite. They had the weakest schedule in the NFL, remarkable injury luck, and won a bunch of games at the very end. As one personnel guy colorfully put it afterward, they had a horseshoe up their butt.
My guess is the truth about that roster was somewhere between those two seasons. In 2024, almost everything broke their way. In 2025, almost everything broke against them. But I also think Peters left the roster vulnerable enough at certain spots that if things didn't break right, there was a real chance the dam would break. And it did.
That's basically where I am on Peters overall: so-so thus far. I don't think he sucks at his job. I also don't think he's proven he's great at it.
When people explain that there's a method behind what Peters does, I don't disagree at all. Of course there is. He's not throwing darts at a board. He has a philosophy and a rationale behind his decisions. The question for me isn't whether he has a plan. It's how good is he at evaluating players and executing that plan? So far, IMO, the results are a mixed bag.
And that's pretty consistent with how I've reacted to his moves in real time. I've defended some, questioned others, liked some immediately and disliked others immediately. I haven't been sitting here waiting for things to go wrong so I can criticize him.
For me to get to the point where I think, I'm not crazy about this move, but Peters has been right often enough that I'll trust him on it, he has to earn that level of confidence through his decisions. He hasn't done that for me yet.
Does Peters need me or any other fan to trust him? Of course not. The person whose confidence ultimately matters is his boss.
But from a message-board standpoint, where we're all just giving our opinions as fans, he's not someone whose decisions I reflexively trust. I don't reflexively distrust them either. I can go either way depending on the move.
So if the argument is simply, "Peters isn't an idiot and there's a logical thought process behind what he does," then there's really nothing for us to debate. I agree. My question is whether his evaluations and decisions are ultimately good enough. That's the part I think is still very much TBD.


