The Front Office: Adam Peters and Roster Construction

Me too, but I also don't know that we didnt, which is why I'm just not in a place to say we didn't try.

Deebo may have decided against an extension (yes I agree this isn't good, to have traded for him and not had this worked out)


the rest of it, we likely wont know... which sucks, but is also how we've wanted them to do business for a long damn time. Nobody knew we were in on Tunsil til the move happened.
We might have - as I keep saying. But effort isn’t enough. I want to know why we are missing on these guys and how we could have gotten them.

If it had anything to do with our coaching situation (which I believe it has, that is an opinion) then yes. This falls on Peters and Quinn.

Until otherwise seen, I default to what I have seen and that is: not much.
 
Great response. Maybe we should have put a gun to his head.
Well the amount of acceptance to an obvious FO failure during free agency is quite staggering.

$50m in remaining cap space. $50m.

Extra $20m upfront on a 4 year deal, $5m hit this year. Thats without voidable years being considered. That’s nothing in the world of the NFL salary cap.

I’d wager Harris doesn’t want outstanding failure, he wants results.
 
Me too, but I also don't know that we didnt, which is why I'm just not in a place to say we didn't try.

Deebo may have decided against an extension (yes I agree this isn't good, to have traded for him and not had this worked out)


the rest of it, we likely wont know... which sucks, but is also how we've wanted them to do business for a long damn time. Nobody knew we were in on Tunsil til the move happened.
I think Pittman is the only one we would have a legitimate shot at, and someone I thought we should have chased. BTJ still hasn't been traded, Shaheed stayed home, there is 0.00% chance Roseman puts AJ Brown in division, especially against what should be his chief competition this year.
 
Well the amount of acceptance to an obvious FO failure during free agency is quite staggering.

$50m in remaining cap space. $50m.

Extra $20m upfront on a 4 year deal, $5m hit this year. Thats without voidable years being considered. That’s nothing in the world of the NFL salary cap.

I’d wager Harris doesn’t want outstanding failure, he wants results.
You know what esle? We should TOTALLY force someone to give us a first round pick for Daron Payne! Why aren't we even trying?!
 
You know what esle? We should TOTALLY force someone to give us a first round pick for Daron Payne! Why aren't we even trying?!
Because he’s not worth it.

I’d say a 4th and 6th for Payne.

There’s another $20m we could have redirected to a receiver.
 
Because he’s not worth it.

I’d say a 4th and 6th for Payne.

There’s another $20m we could have redirected to a receiver.
So we should have offered Pierce $45m/per? Doubs $30m/per? You know those moves aren't made in a vacuum, right?
 
I actually think it’s a sign of fan growth that many are not willing to give Adam Peters and company a complete pass because he’s a new GM, he came to us from one of the best organizations in the NFL, and he has a great reputation. In the past most fans would choose to blindly believe because we wanted things to work out so badly.

It’s true that AP is still learning. It’s definitely true that ALL GMs have hits and misses. It’s true that he inherited a shit show of a roster thanks to Ron Rivera’s clueless reign. And AP has made some great moves and some highly questionable ones.

But generally I am glad fans are not drinking the Koolaid without questioning things.
 
I don't know what Daron Payne is worth, but I wonder where Payne and 71 would get us?
 
So we should have offered Pierce $45m/per? Doubs $30m/per? You know those moves aren't made in a vacuum, right?
No, because those contract numbers are ridiculously exaggerated and probably greater than 50% more than what they actually got.
 
No, because those contract numbers are ridiculously exaggerated and probably greater than 50% more than what they actually got.
So what's would be the ceiling for those players? It was rumored that Pierce went back to Indy, despite us offering more. How much more would it take?
 
So what's would be the ceiling for those players? It was rumored that Pierce went back to Indy, despite us offering more. How much more would it take?
I would think it is impossible for me to give you an answer that we could ever agree on 😂
 
I would think it is impossible for me to give you an answer that we could ever agree on 😂
Well, you made the statement that we should give them $XXm more. I am curious what your cap is? How much did we offer? How much more should it have been?
 
I actually think it’s a sign of fan growth that many are not willing to give Adam Peters and company a complete pass because he’s a new GM, he came to us from one of the best organizations in the NFL, and he has a great reputation. In the past most fans would choose to blindly believe because we wanted things to work out so badly.

It’s true that AP is still learning. It’s definitely true that ALL GMs have hits and misses. It’s true that he inherited a shit show of a roster thanks to Ron Rivera’s clueless reign. And AP has made some great moves and some highly questionable ones.

But generally I am glad fans are not drinking the Koolaid without questioning things.
I actually think this draft is a pivotal moment for AP.

Two picks before the high end of the 5th round. Don’t see that working.

I know many don’t want a trade back from #7, I reckon he needs to facilitate a move, still get a stud, and extra picks.

Got to start backing up that reputation you refer to.
 
I apologize to Riggo44 for singling him out as there have been a number of snarky posts in this thread (guessing we are all experiencing some pre-draft anxiousness).
 
Well, you made the statement that we should give them $XXm more. I am curious what your cap is? How much did we offer? How much more should it have been?
I’ve said previously in the FA thread that 10/15% extra, built in upfront, as an example approach. Maybe more.
 
That’s why I said if

And if we do then AP will have clearly sat on that Aiyuk deal and let it influence our earlier FA approach at receiver.

Time will tell once the draft passes and we make further moves.


The question I asked is what moved out that do you wish would have made. Meaning it's already happened and we failed. We can't be critical of a move that hasn't happened yet.
 
We might have - as I keep saying. But effort isn’t enough. I want to know why we are missing on these guys and how we could have gotten them.

If it had anything to do with our coaching situation (which I believe it has, that is an opinion) then yes. This falls on Peters and Quinn.

Until otherwise seen, I default to what I have seen and that is: not much.


That's fair.
 
I apologize to Riggo44 for singling him out as there have been a number of snarky posts in this thread (guessing we are all experiencing some pre-draft anxiousness).
Eh. This is big of you, but I don’t want Riggo to apologize and I don’t want you to apologize.

I think differing points of view are healthy.

I disagree by and large with Riggo, but I don’t think it’s the end of the world. We’re engaged and having convos on a forum. To me, that’s the best part of all of this.

It all comes down to benefit of the doubt vs no benefit of the doubt.

I haven’t been pleased with this FO for over a year now. Others are okay giving it more time and growth.

I do agree there has been growth. Just not where I think it was most necessary.

I’m also open to there being time.

But I think this stuff is healthy.
 
I’ve said previously in the FA thread that 10/15% extra, built in upfront, as an example approach. Maybe more.
Given that Pierce stayed in Indy, despite us offering more per reports, how do you know we didn't do that?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top