Did you all know that Alfred got a $211,000 performance bonus from the NFL during this offseason? I have a feeling that it will be even better next year.
Last edited:
Let me know when engineers are getting 40 million dollar signing bonuses then not showing up to work and the employer has no repercussions.
Yes, I know that was an extreme case, but I don't know how else to explain it at this point. Even your corner case that favors your side of the argument pales in comparison to the average case in the NFL.
Did you all know that Alfred got a $211,000 performance bonus from the NFL during this offseason? I have a feeling that it will be even better next year.
I'm sure it would have its own unintended consequences. Players would be playing for stats, not for winning the game.Maybe a pay-for-performance system isn't that bad? Get rid of the cap altogether, pay every player a base salary of $200K or something, and literally pay players for their additional stats?
Then they could adjust our seat prices based on performance.
4-12 under jim Zorn - skins pay you 50$ a game to attend
It's too early.
For all we know he could be another Reggie Brooks, a one-year wonder.
He got paid according to his draft status, and after just one year, that's what is fair.
If we're going to start adjusting salaries, for players after just one year, then by that logic, we should start cutting pay for players who were huge disappointments after one rookie season. Can't have it both ways. If you agree and sign your name to a contract, then honor it, for more than just one year.
The Butler is one of my favorite Redskins.
This is the problem ; Interfering sentimental issues with a business decision. Which isn't prudent.
As for the statistical side that you bring up - once again, I give you Reggie Brooks, who had an extremely similar rookie season to Morris, and actually many ways identical, but who disintegrated immediately after his rookie season.
Their rookie stats, for comparison :
Morris
Att Yds Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Avg Lng TD FUM Lost
335 1,613 4.8 39T 13 11 77 7.0 20 0 4 3
Brooks
223 1,063 4.8 85T 3 21 186 8.9 43 0 4 2
I'm not seeing at all how these two rookies seasons are similar at all. Over 100 more carries. 10 more TDs. Roughly 600 more yards. The only thing similar is YPC.
The only thing similar is YPC. Which, if he had the same amount of carries as AMtrak I doubt it's that high...
Of course, Morris is expected to have more yards and TD's with more carries.
The fact that the 2 backs have identical YPC on such large carry loads, makes the "600 more yards" and some of the additional TD's, an entirely moot point.
Doubt ? Based on what ?
The fact that Brooks had 223 carries, proved that his YPC was no fluke. If he only carried part-time, like for 30 carries all year, you might have a point. But that's not the case. Carrying 223 times in a season, totally legitimizes a player's YPC, so it's is far cry from being a a slouch, or a fluke who produces a mis-leading YPC.
You only mentioned the stats which make Morris appear better, and even those stats are largely irrelevant, as I noted. And you also discounted where they were similar in stats, without any reasonable basis for discounting it. Also, you made no mention of how Brooks had a far better Long Run, and in addition, was a better receiver in single every receiving stat. Those facts, combined with your continual reference to him as "The Butler" causes me to believe that fandom love is over-riding logic in your argument.
Chances are Shanny eventually finds another back and we never pay him greatly. Maybe we can trade him next year for a shutdown corner?
You haven't joined any rooms.