This is a fair response, and I appreciate the thoughtful answer.
I think I fundamentally disagree with the idea of being reluctant to criticize (or praise) a process before the outcome is known. I think bad plans can succeed and good plans can fail, and identifying which is which before the outcome is part of the fun for me as a fan. I like to root for good processes, believing that more often than not, good results follow good processes. I dream of rooting for a team that on the whole has unimpeachable processes, because then I can’t get upset with the results, even when bad things happen.
I get more upset when bad results follow obviously bad processes, because it’s like shooting yourself in the foot and damages the hope I have for the season before it ever begins. I don’t like relying on miracles and low percentage chance outcomes and unlikely winning streaks to enjoy the season. Bad luck, injuries, bad reffing, bad outcomes…none of it actually bothers me that much when the decision-making that led to it was sound, because that’s life and you can’t control beyond what you can control. I tend to veer towards rooting for how our franchise tries to control those variables ahead of time, that’s where the majority of my energy goes as a fan.
But I also understand that’s a preference (and maybe a weird one), and we all share a rooting interest for the team while differing in HOW we do the actual rooting. That’s probably why most of my posting about the team is focused around how and why we make the decisions we do, rather than just about the outcomes.
This exchange I think helped me understand myself as a fan a little better, so thanks for that.