Their bet for #2 WR last year.


The argument i've made about a lot of things..
it's easy to say "You've got to do something" but does that 'something' actually provide a justifiable upgrade?
We saw it with WR2. Peters catching crap about the WR room... If we had done what the fans wanted, we likely wouldn't have Diggs, and we likely would have spend at lot more, either by dollars or resources.
A lot of people panicked about Tunsil, but what is actually available, at the correct market value, that's an upgrade over him?
It's easy to play the Madden waiver wire... the real world doesn't exist that way.
The fans wanted Peters to upgrade the WR room this offseason. Peters himself said it was one of the most important things needed to help Jayden. He ultimately added a good (albeit older) #2 so good for him. Prior to that all of his efforts were unsuccessful. On the OL - it's fair to say some of it is just bad injury luck. However, Peters created a hole at center, let his former starter walk, assumed he could just plug Allegretti in there, and now is caught with his pants down because we don't even have a serviceable backup. That is a fair assessment imho.
And while I agree 'doing something' just to do something isn't always a sound strategy, giving Jayden Daniels time to throw and keeping him off the ground are pretty important priorities. Right now it looks like whether we can even do that is in serious question. So 'doing something' doesn't sound like a bad idea.
If losing a starter or two blows up your season, you didn't plan very well, and you don't have the right backups on your roster. Maybe it will all be fine, but I think there are serious questions about some of Peters decision-making and what we did at center is one of them.


If they don’t protect Jayden Daniels this team has no immediate future. That’s what makes this different.


Why not sign Graham?
Glasgow?
I dont know.
From where we're sitting, they're not scrambling over C, or at least we're not hearing about it.
With the way this FO has been working over 3 years, we've seen a path that we can kind of figure out what they're doing, but other times they come out of nowhere.
We saw a movement toward WR, but we didn't see Tunsil coming... we didn't see Chenal... hell, we didnt really see Diggs. A lot of people were asking 'why' for a long time before the local beat guys started actually suggesting they were hearing things.
Now they cut Harris. They cut Forbes, Moody....
I guess my point is, we have no idea what they're doing until they let us know what they're doing.
Now Gulbin is getting more reps with Jayden. It may be their plan to have him take over. Possible they don't want to throw him out there for a few weeks and it's better in their mind to 'hold tight' with in house for a couple weeks while they transition? I dont know, just throwing out potential explanations?
Good thought, but is Glasgow better or worse than any centers that will be cut/available via trade? A bird in the hand. I guess it takes two to tango, so who knows what is really going on behind the scenes with efforts to bring in a new center.Im assuming they are waiting for roster cuts and then will bring in a center
Good-Jones -- this years version of Chris Moore? We love our backups and we are riding with what we got until the bitter end.
Glasgow?
I dont know.
From where we're sitting, they're not scrambling over C, or at least we're not hearing about it.
With the way this FO has been working over 3 years, we've seen a path that we can kind of figure out what they're doing, but other times they come out of nowhere.
We saw a movement toward WR, but we didn't see Tunsil coming... we didn't see Chenal... hell, we didnt really see Diggs. A lot of people were asking 'why' for a long time before the local beat guys started actually suggesting they were hearing things.
Now they cut Harris. They cut Forbes, Moody....
I guess my point is, we have no idea what they're doing until they let us know what they're doing.
Now Gulbin is getting more reps with Jayden. It may be their plan to have him take over. Possible they don't want to throw him out there for a few weeks and it's better in their mind to 'hold tight' with in house for a couple weeks while they transition? I dont know, just throwing out potential explanations?
No idea but I’m guessing (hoping) it’s because he’s 34 and they feel like he’ll still be there for them if they wait until final roster cuts to see if somebody younger and/or better comes available. Seems like a similar situation to Diggs, where everyone was complaining about not making the “obvious move” and then it happened after AP patiently waited for other options to unfold. For all we know, he had been talking to Diggs and his agent all along, and knew that he had him in his back pocket as a fallback option. Could be the same situation here with Glasnow. Who knows. I’m not saying any of this is ideal, far from it, but also I’m not going to panic about it until we see what happens.Why not sign Graham?