The 2026 Free Agency Thread

It's hard not to appreciate that take. You are correct, have not heard anything big about Sinnott working on improvements.

Are there any other prior draftees or any others, that have been driven this off season? I have heard a lot of Jayden and Terry but can't really think of others.

The player I am really hoping has this drive is Coleman. We need for him to shine although to me he already proved to be a valuable T. We had heard of strides from his LG competition Paul. Also Tunsil spoke up for Paul which I found oddly. We need one of those guys to really step up.
I did hear that McCaffrey and Sinnott both joined Daniels in Los Angeles for those extra off season reps. Not sure how much that answers your question, but it suggests both are working.
 
We'll see. Logan Paulsen—who readily admits he tends to view the team through an optimistic lens—seemed a little skeptical about Jer'Zhan Newton's fit in this scheme. At least in Brian Flores' defense, the defensive tackles are often asked to occupy gaps, anchor against the run, and let others make plays. That's never really been Newton's calling card. Logan seemed to think Ben Sinnott would benefit more from the scheme, but I also didn't come away with the impression that he views Sinnott as some hidden superstar. When Grant pressed him on Sinnott, Logan's response felt more like a vibe of, "I think he'll be a solid player," rather than, "This guy is about to break out."

The player Logan seemed most excited about was Luke McCaffrey. I've made a similar point myself—not because I'm watching practice like Logan is, but because McCaffrey has more of a development arc, hasn't played WR for long, and seems to have that insane work ethic-drive to great. It's not that I am counting on hiim but if I had to pick one among Burks, Lane and him -- I'd go Luke.

As for Sinnott, I still have some reservations. When I hear people say route running isn't his biggest strength, and then hear Sinnott himself acknowledge that he's not an Ertz-type route runner, my reaction is, Why not make that your focus? Route running is a craft that can improve with work. It also reminds me of what I said before that draft: I loved his physicality and toughness, but I wasn't convinced he was a natural separator. Because of that, I'm still not sold that he develops into someone like Cole Kmet.

The encouraging thing I keep hearing—from the beat reporters and from Logan—is Blough's scheme should create more space and easier opportunities for this offense. I hope they're right. At the same time, I can't get Sean McVay's comments out of my head. McVay has talked about how he wasn't nearly as good during his first year as an offensive coordinator because there's so much you learn on the job. He leaned heavily on Jay Gruden that season and felt he made a huge jump in Year 2.

That's why I'm a little cautious about all the Blough optimism. But lol, as camp approaches, I can tell the local media is buying the Kool Aide, as most albiet not all of them typically do. I hope they are right. I am not sold on the team's spin about their offense that the local media is eating up as camp approaches -- but I do think Jayden overcomes it but I just hate that they keep doing that to him -- but I think I am more optimisic than most about the defense, I love some of the new acquisitons. If I had to pick 2 players the local media is sleeping on its Cross and Chaisson. Though Cross seems to be gaining some steam with some. I actually think the talent on defense has gone from crappy to above average.
Yes, that idea that OC is hard in y1 has been expressed from many.

I have low expectations on execution this year. I think one of the best outcomes could be firing DQ at season end and hiring Blough assuming he is ready and the FO likes him. Or putting DQ into some kind of FO role.

Even if Blough succeeds, at this point I question these guys’ ability to pick good coordinators. If they knock it out of the park this time they are batting .500. For coordinator picking that isn’t horrible but it isn’t good either.

So I would like them to retain Blough. Even if Blough stays another year, if he is gone after that… what good is it in the end? It would be nice if the road led to him as Hc.

Yea all expounding far into the future, yes let’s hope Blough is good first. I am just pointing out that if all of that plays out DQ hasn’t made himself into a great HC in my eyes still.

On topic though: the coordinator change may indeed unlock a lot of players and I think you nailed it, highlighting Luke but Sinnott may be asked to do more “Sinnott” things as well. The best schemes do that. They find fits. That I think is why Sinnott didn’t get playing time with KK. He didn’t fit exactly into the mold.
 
It's hard not to appreciate that take. You are correct, have not heard anything big about Sinnott working on improvements.

Are there any other prior draftees or any others, that have been driven this off season? I have heard a lot of Jayden and Terry but can't really think of others.

The player I am really hoping has this drive is Coleman. We need for him to shine although to me he already proved to be a valuable T. We had heard of strides from his LG competition Paul. Also Tunsil spoke up for Paul which I found oddly. We need one of those guys to really step up.

Off the top of my head

A. Terry of course is always a maniac on that front
B. Styles some buzz about him on this
C. Luke
D. Tunsil
E. Chris Paul

For Coleman Keim keeps hinting that they the coaches want to see him be tougher, that he doesn't like playing through things when he doesn't feel 100%
 
Yes, that idea that OC is hard in y1 has been expressed from many.

I have low expectations on execution this year. I think one of the best outcomes could be firing DQ at season end and hiring Blough assuming he is ready and the FO likes him. Or putting DQ into some kind of FO role.

Even if Blough succeeds, at this point I question these guys’ ability to pick good coordinators. If they knock it out of the park this time they are batting .500. For coordinator picking that isn’t horrible but it isn’t good either.

So I would like them to retain Blough. Even if Blough stays another year, if he is gone after that… what good is it in the end? It would be nice if the road led to him as Hc.

Yea all expounding far into the future, yes let’s hope Blough is good first. I am just pointing out that if all of that plays out DQ hasn’t made himself into a great HC in my eyes still.

On topic though: the coordinator change may indeed unlock a lot of players and I think you nailed it, highlighting Luke but Sinnott may be asked to do more “Sinnott” things as well. The best schemes do that. They find fits. That I think is why Sinnott didn’t get playing time with KK. He didn’t fit exactly into the mold.

The irony to me is Chig is sort of a TE in that Sinnott mold -- short passes-YAC-physicality and speed. Chig obviously better at it.

As for Blough, maybe so. He doesn't strike me the most charasmatic dude and I've heard he's on the quiet side so it makes me wonder about him as a HC. But he also came off a bit intense in a good way when mic'd up in practice.

As for Quinn, yeah to me its do or die for him this season.
 
Yes, that idea that OC is hard in y1 has been expressed from many.

I have low expectations on execution this year. I think one of the best outcomes could be firing DQ at season end and hiring Blough assuming he is ready and the FO likes him. Or putting DQ into some kind of FO role.

Even if Blough succeeds, at this point I question these guys’ ability to pick good coordinators. If they knock it out of the park this time they are batting .500. For coordinator picking that isn’t horrible but it isn’t good either.

So I would like them to retain Blough. Even if Blough stays another year, if he is gone after that… what good is it in the end? It would be nice if the road led to him as Hc.

Yea all expounding far into the future, yes let’s hope Blough is good first. I am just pointing out that if all of that plays out DQ hasn’t made himself into a great HC in my eyes still.

On topic though: the coordinator change may indeed unlock a lot of players and I think you nailed it, highlighting Luke but Sinnott may be asked to do more “Sinnott” things as well. The best schemes do that. They find fits. That I think is why Sinnott didn’t get playing time with KK. He didn’t fit exactly into the mold.
I'm not sure there is a path for Blough to be our HC if we suck this year. He's too inexperienced to promote to HC if we dump DQ. A new HC will want their own OC so Blough won't stick if we do move on from DQ.

The only way I see Blough being our HC is if DQ is successful enough for a couple of years so that Blough can gain that experience with us. Blough could takeover as HC when DQ steps down.
 
I did hear that McCaffrey and Sinnott both joined Daniels in Los Angeles for those extra off season reps. Not sure how much that answers your question, but it suggests both are working.

It's not about whether they work hard—for the most part, everyone in the NFL does.

I'm talking about that extra gear. The guys who get singled out by coaches and teammates as absolute maniacs when it comes to preparation and improving their craft. From everything I've heard, Luke McCaffrey strikes me as one of those players.

Maybe the difference is 80 mph versus 100 mph. I know it's subjective, and none of us really knows what's happening behind the scenes. But whenever I hear the same stories repeated over and over—that a player is relentless, obsessed with improving, always working on something—I pay attention.

I try to do the same thing when evaluating draft prospects. Those little anecdotes stick with me. It's one of the reasons I was so high on Terry McLaurin before that draft. I remember defending the pick on ES because almost everything I'd read about him described him as an absolute maniac when it came to work ethic. Sometimes those intangible traits end up mattering more than people realize -- at least back in the day goingcommando did. I used to argue with him on that point.
 
I'm not sure there is a path for Blough to be our HC if we suck this year. He's too inexperienced to promote to HC if we dump DQ. A new HC will want their own OC so Blough won't stick if we do move on from DQ.

The only way I see Blough being our HC is if DQ is successful enough for a couple of years so that Blough can gain that experience with us. Blough could takeover as HC when DQ steps down.

Yeah…it’s extremely rare. The only example I can think of would be Bruce Arians moving into a fake FO role (really closer to retiring) with an agreement that his dude Todd Bowles succeeded him as HC. Quinn strikes me as being a little young and unhappy with his legacy for that sort of agreement. And coordinators don’t usually want to take their mentor’s jobs if they’re fired (see McVay saying he wouldn’t have taken the job here if we fired Gruden for him).

So I don’t see what circumstance could possibly lead to Blough becoming the HC here even IF he kills it and becomes a hot commodity (not a guarantee). Seems like a pipe dream which is why I hate the defensive HC strategy with a young franchise QB.
 
As to the weapons issue, I know some people here push back on this, but to me it's about as obvious as saying water is wet.

What I find more interesting is this: I seriously doubt it's lost on Adam Peters that, outside of some diehard supporters and a handful of people in the local media, the prevailing opinion is that he hasn't done enough to surround Jayden Daniels with top-end weapons.

I also don't think Peters is naïve. He's smart enough to know how this league works. If this season goes sideways, Dan Quinn is probably gone, and Peters suddenly finds himself on the hot seat.

That's why I wonder if that reality increases the urgency to sign someone like Stefon Diggs. Whether Diggs is the right answer is a separate debate, but the broader point is that Peters has every incentive to be aggressive. He likely knows the criticism, he knows the expectations, and he knows he may not get another offseason to prove he can build the kind of supporting cast a franchise quarterback deserves.

 
Just odd humor from me. Of course Jayden is the savior, he doesn't have anybody on offense sans Terry who will take over games and Terry is arguable.
Ah good, I was thrown honestly lol. I don't see a way that any of the other offensive players will be "the guy". I see a number of players having a really solid year but no one absolute star or stud this season. At least I hope as I'd like to see great run game success while Jayden gets comfortable discussing the ball to a bunch of players instead of leaning heavily on one or two guys
 
Next years draft is supposed to be stacked with talent, we don't want to give up any of those picks, but maybe that also means teams would be willing to trade away players they wouldn't normally.

Whats the highest pick we'd be willing to spend? 3rd? 2nd? 1st if we think they could become what AJ Brown was for the Eagles?
 
I think when you are building a roster from scratch through the draft what is going to happen is you end up with some players who you were hoping to be starters that end up valuable depth, but then other players you thought would be depth emerge into something else. Quality depth players are important to the big picture of building a championship team but fans are not going to be excited or even happy with depth chart players until the solid starters are also on the roster. For example if John Bates was the #1 TE on the team fans would definitely be unhappy with his abilities, but with a pass catching TE ahead of him as the starter you get to see what Bates actually excels at and why a player like him who's value isn't running downfield splitting a defense shinning in the run game and blocking.

I am hoping Sinnott is going into Year #3 will be used by Blough in whatever way they witnessed over his first two seasons that he showed promise at and mold his contributions to the offense around more of that whenever possible.
 
Next years draft is supposed to be stacked with talent, we don't want to give up any of those picks, but maybe that also means teams would be willing to trade away players they wouldn't normally.

Whats the highest pick we'd be willing to spend? 3rd? 2nd? 1st if we think they could become what AJ Brown was for the Eagles?
The floor cost for Jeremiah Smith is 2 FRPs in my opinion. If he has another healthy and dominant year it is going to be even higher.
 
I don't think it's actual pushback. Pretty much everyone acknowledges that the wide receiver room is a weakness. No one's denying that. What I think some (like me) are doing is figuring out how to make lemonade. We're considering scenarios in which this offense could work by focusing on what we do have instead of what we don't.

Right now, we have one quality NFL receiver on the roster, a rookie, and a bunch of journeymen. Some have potential, but most probably are what they are at this point. So, if that's the case and we as fans can't do anything about it, what can work? Where can we project our hope?

Well, a heavy running attack with a two TE base means fewer receivers on the field. So, let's focus on running and the receiving skills of other positions. Maybe that will help. Do we have good runners? Do we have a good o line? Was Kliff dismissive and unimaginative when it came to the run game? If so, maybe we can deploy is a run centric/play action team. Bates and Sinnott can block. Sinnott catches the ball when it's thrown to him. Chig can be dynamic and has flashed despite playing with really bad quarterbacks. White looks to be a good third down receiving back. Bill was really dynamic for a half a season.

So, that's the glass half full. Again, that isn't pushback, it's just being pragmatic. It's being realistic. It's trying to determine the best outcome given what you have.

Circling back to weaknesses, I think everyone wants at least one more wide receiver. I expect we will get one. Until we do though, I am going to imagine narratives in which we can work around that weakness, make due or even succeed... at least until the first preseason game.
 
I don't think it's actual pushback. Pretty much everyone acknowledges that the wide receiver room is a weakness. No one's denying that. What I think some (like me) are doing is figuring out how to make lemonade. We're considering scenarios in which this offense could work by focusing on what we do have instead of what we don't.

Right now, we have one quality NFL receiver on the roster, a rookie, and a bunch of journeymen. Some have potential, but most probably are what they are at this point. So, if that's the case and we as fans can't do anything about it, what can work? Where can we project our hope?

Well, a heavy running attack with a two TE base means fewer receivers on the field. So, let's focus on running and the receiving skills of other positions. Maybe that will help. Do we have good runners? Do we have a good o line? Was Kliff dismissive and unimaginative when it came to the run game? If so, maybe we can deploy is a run centric/play action team. Bates and Sinnott can block. Sinnott catches the ball when it's thrown to him. Chig can be dynamic and has flashed despite playing with really bad quarterbacks. White looks to be a good third down receiving back. Bill was really dynamic for a half a season.

So, that's the glass half full. Again, that isn't pushback, it's just being pragmatic. It's being realistic. It's trying to determine the best outcome given what you have.

Circling back to weaknesses, I think everyone wants at least one more wide receiver. I expect we will get one. Until we do though, I am going to imagine narratives in which we can work around that weakness, make due or even succeed... at least until the first preseason game.

There are definitely people who push back on this as to it not being a concern—some on this board and in the local media. Off the top of my head, the main arguments seem to be:

A. The No. 2 wide receiver isn't that important anyway.
If you're going to have one weakness on offense, that's the one to have. We've had at least one poster make this argument repeatedly.

B. Chig effectively gives them a No. 2 receiver.
Because he can line up in the slot, it's almost like having another starting wide receiver. This has become one of the more popular arguments in the local media.

C. Heavy two- and three-tight end personnel makes a No. 2 receiver less important.
Teams like the Bears and Ravens have shown you can lean into multiple-TE sets rather than investing heavily in a second receiver.

D. David Blough's scheme will unlock the offense.
The belief is that his system will create separation and easier opportunities, making the supporting cast look better than it really is. This is probably the second-most common talking point I hear locally.

E. Terry McLaurin changes everything.
The offense struggled without him last season, so simply having Terry healthy should solve many of the problems.

My response to each of those:

A.
The NFL doesn't seem to agree. Wide receivers are one of the highest-paid positions in football, and teams aren't just paying one of them—they're paying two at times. The Pats weren't just satisified with getting one WR this off season, they got two. Outside of quarterback, there may not be a bigger investment on offense than pass catchers. If No. 2 receiver weren't that important, the league wouldn't be spending on the position, it would be like safety if so.

B. Jayden's No. 2 target last season was Zach Ertz, who also spent plenty of time in the slot. So this isn't some revolutionary concept. Chig is a different kind of player, and I liked the acquisition, but the local media is much higher on him than the national media, coaches, or league evaluators. Let's see him become a big time difference-maker before we start treating him like one.

C. I have no problem with multiple-tight end sets. The issue is personnel. Teams that successfully lean into that identity usually have multiple proven tight ends. Heck the Bears have two legit TEs, and then they add potentially a third this off season. That's not this team. If Ben Sinnott develops into someone like Cole Kmet, I'm all for it. But projecting that before he's shown it is a leap.

D. I hope David Blough turns out to be an outstanding coordinator. But I think it's premature to anoint him before he's called a single regular-season play. Plenty of coaches around the league—including Sean McVay—have talked about how steep the learning curve is for first-time coordinators. It's reasonable to expect some bumps along the way versus think he's going to kill it from the jump. We are treating Kliff like he was some sort of incompetent now. But he was lauded his first season. Not that same was Mariota throwing to Chris Moore last year but still it wasn't a bottom offense.

E. Terry absolutely could have a huge season. But there's an irony here. The reason the front office reportedly hesitated to commit major money to him was the concern that receivers over 30 are more likely to decline or miss time. Then, last season, that exact scenario played out. Expecting everything to simply disappear with Terry now another year older is hardly a certainty. If you look at the recent rankings of wide receivers by NFL coaches and executives, almost none of the top players were 30 or older. Age doesn't mean Terry can't still be great—but it does mean it's fair to acknowledge the risk.
 
I don't think it's actual pushback. Pretty much everyone acknowledges that the wide receiver room is a weakness. No one's denying that. What I think some (like me) are doing is figuring out how to make lemonade. We're considering scenarios in which this offense could work by focusing on what we do have instead of what we don't.

Right now, we have one quality NFL receiver on the roster, a rookie, and a bunch of journeymen. Some have potential, but most probably are what they are at this point. So, if that's the case and we as fans can't do anything about it, what can work? Where can we project our hope?

Well, a heavy running attack with a two TE base means fewer receivers on the field. So, let's focus on running and the receiving skills of other positions. Maybe that will help. Do we have good runners? Do we have a good o line? Was Kliff dismissive and unimaginative when it came to the run game? If so, maybe we can deploy is a run centric/play action team. Bates and Sinnott can block. Sinnott catches the ball when it's thrown to him. Chig can be dynamic and has flashed despite playing with really bad quarterbacks. White looks to be a good third down receiving back. Bill was really dynamic for a half a season.

So, that's the glass half full. Again, that isn't pushback, it's just being pragmatic. It's being realistic. It's trying to determine the best outcome given what you have.

Circling back to weaknesses, I think everyone wants at least one more wide receiver. I expect we will get one. Until we do though, I am going to imagine narratives in which we can work around that weakness, make due or even succeed... at least until the first preseason game.

Just to be clear, I still expect this offense to make lemonade out of lemons. But the biggest reason is Jayden Daniels—not because I think the supporting cast is where it should be. And if they sign Diggs, which is still possible, the narrative changes completely for me.

What frustrates me is watching how the other quarterbacks from his draft class are being treated. It feels like their organizations are saying, "Here's 15 premium ingredients. We've done everything we can to make your job easier. Now go cook." Washington, on the other hand, sometimes feels like it's saying, "Here's three ingredients. Figure it out. We believe in you."

I think Jayden will figure it out because that's who he is. But I also wouldn't be shocked if, after another season, the conversation becomes, "All three quarterbacks—Jayden, Caleb Williams, and Drake Maye—are really talented, but Washington got the lessor of the three. Even though to me you can't judge them apples to apples because its too lopsided in favor of the other two especially this season.

Personally, I think Jayden's ceiling is every bit as high as theirs -- probably higher. Ironically, I actually had Drake Maye slightly ahead of Jayden before the draft. But after watching Jayden, I believe right now he's the better QB. But will see.

One person here who defends Peters' offseason pushed back on me by saying maybe Jayden is simply indeed the third-best quarterback of the group, and I'm giving him too much credit—that it's just a coincidence the other two have better supporting casts. Maybe that's true. I just don't believe it is.

That said, I'll admit I have a little ego invested in this debate. As a fan, I love having a quarterback who's universally viewed as one of the five best in the NFL. It adds another level of excitement and national attention to every season.

That brings me to another argument I hear from parts of the local media. Some believe giving Jayden a good defense is more important than surrounding him with elite weapons. If the argument is simply that a better defense might help the team win more games, fine—that's a reasonable debate.

But if we're talking specifically about Jayden's development, its absurd IMO.

When Kurt Warner broke down Jayden's film and pointed out signs of regression, one of the responses from people around the team (leaked to Sheehan) was that Jayden was holding the ball because receivers weren't consistently getting open or weren't running routes the way they should. If that's true, then adding another pass rusher doesn't solve that problem. A polished route runner does. A receiver with legitimate vertical speed who can maximize Jayden's deep-ball accuracy does. Better weapons make the quarterback's job easier and accelerate his growth.

So yes, I expect Jayden to make lemonade out of lemons because I think he's that special.

I just don't like asking him to.

Especially when the other young franchise quarterbacks around the league are getting exactly the opposite treatment from their organizations.
 
What frustrates me most is the lack of stability after this year Jayden will have to learn another new set of weapons because maybe we have one more year of Terry and Williams, but we still don’t have a two and even three is because it”s unlikely that Van Jefferson, Burks or Dyami are long term fixes. Even Terry isn’t a sure bet for next season.

So while I can imagine lemonade for this season it bothers me that we won’t have ingredients on the shelf for next year. And none of Diggs, Hill, probably Aiyuk resolves that.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 4, Members: 0, Guests: 4)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top