Lane and Luke have not proven to be solid receivers, really even as a WR4 but they must be listed that high on our depth right now due to the low quality WR room. Yup, some have visions of grandeur with these guys or at least one or the other of them but so far we are kind of still looking for a pulse outside of ST's.I like him a lot. And while a dude like Jamison Crowder was almost yawn in a WR room with Pierre Garcon and Desean Jackson but put that same player in a room with McCaffrey and Lane and Dyami and he's a rock star.
And lol part of me enjoys it because I was surprised I was the only one touting Williams on the draft thread. He seemed to me such an obvious bet if they were going to wait until the third. And I can sense it pisses some people off when I say this but to me taking Williams is a clear sign that aren't sold on McCaffrey and Lane -- you don't take three slot WRs in a row in three drafts if you believe in their predessors. You stack outside WRs, not three slot WRs, especially when your big move in FA on offense is taking an F TE -- whose game is often played from the slot.
I hated the idea of just trusting McCaffrey or Lane to be the slot WR. Not because I don't think either could some day emerge. But its not something I'd want to be on. And it was good for me to see they felt the same way.
I wanted an outside guy but I get why they took Williams and why you liked him. I just looked past him because I thought we had not only Luke and Lane but Jefferson who could all be slot. I can see them hoping to move Williams inside and outside which might be good but that's trying to make things work with what you have.
