The 2026 Free Agency Thread

Maybe it’s blind faith, but I don’t think they are banking on hope, and Chig. They clearly see the need. Hard swings on the top guys in FA. They’ve brought in a ton of WR’s for top 30 visits. They are still going to make additions beyond Aiyuk. I think/hope.

Also, adding Chig and a bunch of pass catching RB’s is going to have a lot of impact I think. Especially in making Jayden’s life easier. Having guys that you can throw a short dump off and they generate YAC is going to be something we haven’t seen in a while.

Also, of note, Keim specifically mentioned Jennings as a post draft option if we draft defense at #7. Keim doesn’t usually name drop without having heard something.


I keep wondering what their plan at WR will be if they don't go Tate or another WR in the first. Surely they can't be expecting a third round pick to fill the void, and that would force a need pick over BPA. I'm fascinated to understand what they know about Aiyuk. Do they kind of feel he will be signed eventually? I agree that Chig will take a lot of pressure of the passing game, this is an element they have not had. But clearly they know they need more help, and not Dyami Brown level of help, at WR. Wonder if Deebo will even be an option?
 
I keep wondering what their plan at WR will be if they don't go Tate or another WR in the first. Surely they can't be expecting a third round pick to fill the void, and that would force a need pick over BPA. I'm fascinated to understand what they know about Aiyuk. Do they kind of feel he will be signed eventually? I agree that Chig will take a lot of pressure of the passing game, this is an element they have not had. But clearly they know they need more help, and not Dyami Brown level of help, at WR. Wonder if Deebo will even be an option?
You know, not for nothing… and I am certain we upgraded at tight end so take this comment for what it’s worth… but numbers wise Chig was in an offense that didn’t have many weapons and he didn’t do much better than Ertz.

Now, I think Chig should make a forward step statistically and I love the potential.

But our best signing on offense put up numbers not out of the realm of Zach Ertz.

56 / 560 / 2
Vs.
50 / 504 / 4

So… what part of Chig is an element they haven’t had? Ertz put those numbers up in 4 less games.

Again, I think they upgraded and I think Chig improves on his 2025. But how far do we expect him to improve? And is that a realistic expectation?
 
I think he will be targeted more often
 
I think he will be targeted more often
Very possible. But he was targetted more than Ertz was last year. The two have such similar numbers.

I think a realistic expectation for Chig is 70 / 750 / 5

I think he can go higher. But I feel that is realistic as an expectation.
 
Very possible. But he was targetted more than Ertz was last year. The two have such similar numbers.

I think a realistic expectation for Chig is 70 / 750 / 5

I think he can go higher. But I feel that is realistic as an expectation.
I like him more than Ertz. Hopefully he has some success here
 
Would you prefer they drafted a WR last year or the year before instead of drafting Daniels and Conerly?

I think there’s a compelling argument to be made that growing Coleman at RT and a guy like Luther Burden at WR would outweigh Conerly’s ceiling. Then again, I just think Burden is going to be an absolute stud so of course I feel that way. And I’d rather be problem-solving at RT right now than WR, seeing our options, if I’m using hindsight to really dig into it.
 
Would you prefer they drafted a WR last year or the year before instead of drafting Daniels and Conerly?
I think there's an option besides giving up Daniels and Connerly. It would involve free agency. Which, coming off a championship run, probably would have been more enticing to players than this season's free agency has been.

Otherwise, yeah, Connerly hasn't shown me anything to say he's so awesome that Coleman wouldn't have been adequate when combined with a healthy receiver. Maybe he'll show out next season. But again, actually trying at WR in free agency could have been a good starting point. And not betting on the WR with a career history of injuries. The team went with a plan of the holdout, the gadget player, the injured guy, and "I dunno, SOMEONE is going to have to look good". Oh, and the WR who was retired for a year. Almost forgot about him.
 
Last edited:
I think there's an option besides giving up Daniels and Connerly. It would involve free agency. Which, coming off a championship run, probably would have been more enticing to players than this season's free agency has been.

Otherwise, yeah, Connerly hasn't shown me anything to say he's so awesome that Coleman wouldn't have been adequate when combined with a healthy receiver. Maybe he'll show out next season. But again, actually trying at WR in free agency could have been a good starting point. And not betting on the WR with a career history of injuries. The team went with a plan of the holdout, the gadget player, the injured guy, and "I dunno, SOMEONE is going to have to look good". Oh, and the WR who was retired for a year. Almost forgot about him.

I've been the biggest critic of our WR room and how AP has managed it. But in Free Agency there is 'what we want to do' and there is 'what we are able to do'. You can't force players, especially when you are targeting a very specific need, to sign with you. You can't pay guys twice what they are worth, you don't want to sign guys with major injury histories, or those on the downside of their career, and the players have to want to sign your contract. It's fair to say we did not significantly upgrade our WR room (other then signing a TE). I don't think that was 'the plan' - we just weren't successful finding upgrades in free agency.
 
You know, not for nothing… and I am certain we upgraded at tight end so take this comment for what it’s worth… but numbers wise Chig was in an offense that didn’t have many weapons and he didn’t do much better than Ertz.

Now, I think Chig should make a forward step statistically and I love the potential.

But our best signing on offense put up numbers not out of the realm of Zach Ertz.

56 / 560 / 2
Vs.
50 / 504 / 4

So… what part of Chig is an element they haven’t had? Ertz put those numbers up in 4 less games.

Again, I think they upgraded and I think Chig improves on his 2025. But how far do we expect him to improve? And is that a realistic expectation?
You make a good point, and I'm not doggin Ettz. He played far better than most of us expected here. But the obvious answer is YAC. With Chig we will see more big plays, Ertz caught it and fell down.
 
I've been the biggest critic of our WR room and how AP has managed it. But in Free Agency there is 'what we want to do' and there is 'what we are able to do'. You can't force players, especially when you are targeting a very specific need, to sign with you. You can't pay guys twice what they are worth, you don't want to sign guys with major injury histories, or those on the downside of their career, and the players have to want to sign your contract. It's fair to say we did not significantly upgrade our WR room (other then signing a TE). I don't think that was 'the plan' - we just weren't successful finding upgrades in free agency.
Which honestly still kinda falls on AP… because he hasn’t done it yet in his tenure as GM. Just keeps kicking the can.

Now if Terry got hurt our starting receivers are Van Jefferson and Dyami Brown
 
I've been the biggest critic of our WR room and how AP has managed it. But in Free Agency there is 'what we want to do' and there is 'what we are able to do'. You can't force players, especially when you are targeting a very specific need, to sign with you. You can't pay guys twice what they are worth, you don't want to sign guys with major injury histories, or those on the downside of their career, and the players have to want to sign your contract. It's fair to say we did not significantly upgrade our WR room (other then signing a TE). I don't think that was 'the plan' - we just weren't successful finding upgrades in free agency.
I agree with this. There’s always this disconnect between “what fans want” and “what’s actually possible” in free agency. You can’t force guys to sign, especially when you’re targeting a pretty specific role. And you can’t just throw out crazy money every time or you end up overpaying the wrong players, locking yourself into bad contracts, or chasing guys who are already declining or have injury concerns.

The funny part is how inconsistent the conversation can be. Last year people were pushing back hard on giving Terry an extra $5M per year , a guy who had produced here for six seasons, was a leader, and did everything right. But now you’ll hear a few voices advocating overpaying someone like Jauan Jennings by $5–6M above his market value when he hasn’t done anything for this franchise. If you’re going to stretch financially, it makes a lot more sense to do it for your own proven guy, that at least sends a message to the locker room that production and professionalism get rewarded.

So yeah, I don’t think the plan was “let’s ignore WR.” I think they just didn’t land the upgrades they wanted at the right price.

And there’s still time. Whether it’s waiting on a situation like Brandon Aiyuk potentially hitting the market or adding someone in the draft, the room can still improve.

Plus, I’m not totally out on the internal options. McCaffrey was starting to show something before the injury, 200 yards in essentially 8 games, which puts him on roughly a 400+ yard pace. Small sample, sure, but enough to at least be encouraged. And Lane is still a projection, but the speed is real and there were reports his route running was ahead of what he showed in college. It’s early enough that you can still reasonably hope one of those guys develops into a solid WR3.

So yeah, fair criticism that the room isn’t better right now, but I don’t think that automatically means it was mismanaged. Sometimes the market just doesn’t break your way.
 
I agree with this. There’s always this disconnect between “what fans want” and “what’s actually possible” in free agency. You can’t force guys to sign, especially when you’re targeting a pretty specific role. And you can’t just throw out crazy money every time or you end up overpaying the wrong players, locking yourself into bad contracts, or chasing guys who are already declining or have injury concerns.

The funny part is how inconsistent the conversation can be. Last year people were pushing back hard on giving Terry an extra $5M per year , a guy who had produced here for six seasons, was a leader, and did everything right. But now you’ll hear a few voices advocating overpaying someone like Jauan Jennings by $5–6M above his market value when he hasn’t done anything for this franchise. If you’re going to stretch financially, it makes a lot more sense to do it for your own proven guy, that at least sends a message to the locker room that production and professionalism get rewarded.

So yeah, I don’t think the plan was “let’s ignore WR.” I think they just didn’t land the upgrades they wanted at the right price.

And there’s still time. Whether it’s waiting on a situation like Brandon Aiyuk potentially hitting the market or adding someone in the draft, the room can still improve.

Plus, I’m not totally out on the internal options. McCaffrey was starting to show something before the injury, 200 yards in essentially 8 games, which puts him on roughly a 400+ yard pace. Small sample, sure, but enough to at least be encouraged. And Lane is still a projection, but the speed is real and there were reports his route running was ahead of what he showed in college. It’s early enough that you can still reasonably hope one of those guys develops into a solid WR3.

So yeah, fair criticism that the room isn’t better right now, but I don’t think that automatically means it was mismanaged. Sometimes the market just doesn’t break your way.
Again, though, Peter’s has been the GM for three offseasons now. There have been next to no real improvements to the room. That is mismanagement. This off-season may not be (or maybe it is, time will tell…) but having not added anything of note to the room in three years is absolutely on his lap.

2024:
McLaurin, Crowder, Brown, Brown, McCaffrey

2025:
McLaurin, Deebo, Brown, Burks, McCaffrey, Lane

2026:
McLaurin, Burks, Jefferson, D. Brown, McCaffrey, Lane

An argument can even be made that it’s gotten worse over time.

In fairness, on paper the 2025 room looks alright, but with Terry’s holdout many, even on this forum, we’re worried about the room due to N. Brown’s health and Terry’s hold out. And for a good portion of the season that room was minus those two and even with those two it was shells of them.

Posters on an Internet forum cannot understand the potential for disaster more than the GM (and I’m sure we don’t) so why not make something happen?

2026 has a room, that if everything fires on all cylinders for the entire season won’t be terrible. But everyone has to be healthy and take significant steps forward from their previous bests. We don’t have much of anything that is a sure thing.

Now, if we go out and get Keenan Allen and Deebo (just as an example) then the room does look MUCH improved.

If Aiyuk comes in before August that’ll be a help.

Lots of things can help, for sure.

But there’s nothing saying THOSE guys want to sign with this team, either. They may have other options that they prefer. So we can’t just count on signing a veteran, either, at this point.

It’s a tough situation, but AP needs to get this room right.

In retrospect some bad draft picks and the Lattimore trade could be do-overs. In a vacuum I still don’t mind Lattimore. But those assets could have been used on a receiver. Now, both position groups were weak and overall still are… so tough to gripe that one too much.

If I’m AP I’m looking at every way I can possibly trade for Brian Thomas Jr without giving away prime draft picks next year - including trading guys that are good players but may not have a future after this season to acquire extra draft capital to enable trades.

And he may be doing that.

But it’s been three years. He is liable for this situation, even if this year just didn’t go his way.
 
Last edited:
Adding a WR at 71 only to the WR group does't move the needle enough for me. I don't see many of them being able to be much of a contributor, especially early in the season. Sarratt might be able to do it more than some of the others. I say that because I believe he could step in as WR2 in the red-zone and certain other situations. Otherwise he could step in probably as a WR3 and work into a full time WR2 after Jayden gains trust like Mendoza was able to do easily.
 
I’m kind of with you on the bigger point. Adding a WR at 71 doesn’t really move the needle for me unless you’re getting a very specific type of contributor. On Sarratt specifically, I see him more in that Jauan Jennings and Noah Brown mold. He’s more of a possession receiver, a good route runner, solid at the catch point, but not someone who’s going to consistently separate against man coverage. He did work outside the hashes more than Jennings or Brown, but I think that’s more a function of college usage than a true difference in skillset. If you’re projecting it out, I think year one he’s probably closer to a Noah Brown level contributor. Situational, useful in certain packages, maybe some red zone work. Then if things develop well, he could grow into more of that Jennings type role over a couple years. I do think Jennings is the better player right now, though the gap between him and Noah Brown when healthy probably isn’t as big as people think, especially with how much the 49ers offense boosts production (plus health matters).

So yeah, I just don’t see him as someone who significantly upgrades the room even if he ends up being a solid piece longer term. I'd probably prefer going with somebody like Deion Burks, who I think has a higher upside than Sarratt but is less of a surething (I feel very confident that Sarratt will be useful, but the risk with him is he is never more than a Noah Brown type receiver) and who is probably less than developmental than guys like Hurst and Lance. So Burks would probably be my guy at 71.
 
What are the chances we could consider someone like Stefan Diggs? I guess it would be contingent on his legal issues.

Another option would be to look towards roster cut downs to add another WR but that is a risky proposition.

Clear that we need to draft WR regardless of whether or not either of the two scenarios above play out.
 
If they don't take a WR early and draft one in the 3rd that just screams of filling a need over BPA. I have to believe that they have inside knowledge about acquiring Aiyuk and that is factoring into their decision making to some extent.
 
If they don't take a WR early and draft one in the 3rd that just screams of filling a need over BPA. I have to believe that they have inside knowledge about acquiring Aiyuk and that is factoring into their decision making to some extent.



Depends on who they take. There's a handful of guys that may be there that are the BPA and fit that role. This isn't a bad draft for WR talent, it's just a bad draft for ELITE WR talent. It's top-light... but it's deep.
 
Depends on who they take. There's a handful of guys that may be there that are the BPA and fit that role. This isn't a bad draft for WR talent, it's just a bad draft for ELITE WR talent. It's top-light... but it's deep.
I agree. To me the meat of the WR class will go between the late 1st through the end of the 2nd with a chance of dribbling into the top of the 3rd.
 
I’m kind of with you on the bigger point. Adding a WR at 71 doesn’t really move the needle for me unless you’re getting a very specific type of contributor. On Sarratt specifically, I see him more in that Jauan Jennings and Noah Brown mold. He’s more of a possession receiver, a good route runner, solid at the catch point, but not someone who’s going to consistently separate against man coverage. He did work outside the hashes more than Jennings or Brown, but I think that’s more a function of college usage than a true difference in skillset. If you’re projecting it out, I think year one he’s probably closer to a Noah Brown level contributor. Situational, useful in certain packages, maybe some red zone work. Then if things develop well, he could grow into more of that Jennings type role over a couple years. I do think Jennings is the better player right now, though the gap between him and Noah Brown when healthy probably isn’t as big as people think, especially with how much the 49ers offense boosts production (plus health matters).

So yeah, I just don’t see him as someone who significantly upgrades the room even if he ends up being a solid piece longer term. I'd probably prefer going with somebody like Deion Burks, who I think has a higher upside than Sarratt but is less of a surething (I feel very confident that Sarratt will be useful, but the risk with him is he is never more than a Noah Brown type receiver) and who is probably less than developmental than guys like Hurst and Lance. So Burks would probably be my guy at 71.
Yes Jennings is better today than Sarratt. He is also looking for a contract way more than AP is willing to give. Sarratt is a plug and play guy with certain packages, throw the ball in his direction and he is coming down with it and a very good blocker.

Also, I am not trying to stick on just pushing Sarratt, it is much more of me saying the potential WR's we get at 71 will primarily not be very heavily involved in action in September. Currently at 71 we would require a contributor. There are a few others that could just send long also but defenses would know that
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 6, Members: 0, Guests: 6)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top