Man screw SF. I honestly willing to wait until September for Aiyuk. We should add someone but even if not, I think that Terry and Chig can lead the way with a committee of Luke, Dyami, and Burk helping out. I know that Aiyuk will be training so I'm willing to wait and continue to let SF look bad. If we waited for our own guy in Terry then we can definitely wait for another teams guy who may be damaged goods anyways.I don’t know if this is better in the FA thread or draft thread. We don’t have a trade thread this year so I’m putting it here because most of the Aiyuk conversation has been about him as a FA.
I say no. Because absolutely not taking on Aiyuk’d contract.
View attachment 14401
Got to say, SF is really shitt8ng the bed on this one from a logistical and optics standpoint. Lynch has to know there's no way any team is going to trade for Aiyuk, or more importantly, his contract as it is currently structured. Every GM in the league knows that at some point SF is going to have to cut him loose, so why take on that headache AND give up a pick?
With that said, I have to think that most of the NFL and its fans see SF acting like the scorned ex in this situation (regardless of Aiyuks complicity). SF will/is seen as being extremely petty even using the trade reasoning that seems like a very weak excuse. Id think this is a bad look on the organization and could give the team a self inflicted black eye as players may not want to deal with an organization that treats players in this manner (right or wrong regardless).
Im certainly not saying that Aiyuk is an angel in this, but cooler heads have to prevail. Everyone knows that SF has to cut him inevitably, and everyone knows he's going to Washington. So why create this conundrum for yourself if you're Lynch?
Also, as an aside, I do wonder if Shanny is having a hissy fit behind the scenes about Aiyuk going to Washington. Is he still carrying that grudge even though the perpetrators aren't in the building anymore? Id say its hard to believe, but its possible Kyle is still upset over what occurred with his Dad and Lil Napoleon.
It'd be prudent to just send Aiyuk packing and move on. But something tells me the headlines are going to have to be the driving force for SF to relent.
HTTR!
More from that guy who's been talking about Aiyuk after the Kittle interview
Bulldog Aiyuk is actually getting a little older himself. He turns 29 tomorrow.
I think people are talking about him more than the other guys because we know we have them and this is the time of the year where you add guys, yet we have a significant hole in the same exact spot we had a significant hole last year, which may also be the most important position to our Franchise QB. Not to mention he's looked great before, is close to our Franchise QB, and already has some chemistry with him.
The negatives about him in the locker room seem to be well overstated now when you start to hear the full story from the people who were there. He actually seems well liked by teammates and coaches. Plus I think that he has something to prove and will be on a revenge tour. I think that this should be a big topic right now and we need him.
Diggs has been accused of real stuff off the field so you could argue that is far worse and he may be suspended. I just think that the more the true story gets exposed, the narrative is starting to shift to SF looking like the bad guy which should force them to release him sooner rather than later. I still like him as a receiving threat far more than Jennings.
I love Logans insight
Let's make a deal and I'll throw in a 5th.I don’t know if this is better in the FA thread or draft thread. We don’t have a trade thread this year so I’m putting it here because most of the Aiyuk conversation has been about him as a FA.
I say no. Because absolutely not taking on Aiyuk’d contract.
View attachment 14401
I think there should be some type of penalty, ban or fine for inducing Dan Snyder PTSD.
We can’t wait until September to solve the problem.Man screw SF. I honestly willing to wait until September for Aiyuk. We should add someone but even if not, I think that Terry and Chig can lead the way with a committee of Luke, Dyami, and Burk helping out. I know that Aiyuk will be training so I'm willing to wait and continue to let SF look bad. If we waited for our own guy in Terry then we can definitely wait for another teams guy who may be damaged goods anyways.
No one is going to trade for him and he wants to be here so wait it out in the worst case. I think eventually they will get the hint and let him go sooner than that anyways. If not then he should force the issue, show up to camps and if they send him home get the PA involved. All of the media and nfl will start to rip them.
I wouldn’t do that for a couple of reasons:Just agree to trade LMC to the 49ers in one transaction, on the basis they release Aiyuk. We then pick him up.
Couple of their 4th round comp picks would do it for me.
I think AP, the 49ers, and Aiyuk’s camp will already be in discussions on this subject, so I actually see all 5 points as moot in this case.I wouldn’t do that for a couple of reasons:
1. We can’t negotiate with Aiyuk before he is released
2. If he’s released he can sign with anybody
3. If we use a handshake agreement with him to come here it’s tampering and a violation of league rules and other teams would be pissed
4. It violates the spurt of trade rules. Ie: circumvents taking the contract by having a wink wink nudge nudge agreement. The league wouldn’t like that.
5. There’s nothing stopping Aiyuk from getting released and choosing another team. And then we’re stuck having traded McCaffery and have neither.
This is simple: they release Aiyuk and we sign him.
Until that happens we sit tight and assume he doesn’t exist.
They can’t do it. It’s essentially against the rules. If we had an agreement with Aiyuk before he hits FA the league would violate the contract.I think AP, the 49ers, and Aiyuk’s camp will already be in discussions on this subject, so I actually see all 5 points as moot in this case.
Well then, we should keep our interest in him a secret...shhhhhhhThey can’t do it. It’s essentially against the rules. If we had an agreement with Aiyuk before he hits FA the league would violate the contract.
Trust me on this. It can’t happen as much as you might want it to.
I wouldn’t do that for a couple of reasons:
1. We can’t negotiate with Aiyuk before he is released
2. If he’s released he can sign with anybody
3. If we use a handshake agreement with him to come here it’s tampering and a violation of league rules and other teams would be pissed
4. It violates the spurt of trade rules. Ie: circumvents taking the contract by having a wink wink nudge nudge agreement. The league wouldn’t like that.
5. There’s nothing stopping Aiyuk from getting released and choosing another team. And then we’re stuck having traded McCaffery and have neither.
This is simple: they release Aiyuk and we sign him.
Until that happens we sit tight and assume he doesn’t exist.
They can’t do it. It’s essentially against the rules. If we had an agreement with Aiyuk before he hits FA the league would violate the contract.
Trust me on this. It can’t happen as much as you might want it to.
Interestingly the 49ers just lifted a sizeable salary cap adjustment/benefit through the insurance policy process they follow that’s included in the cap. Ownership insure players to cover injury, pay it from their own pocket, recover some losses that way and gain cap relief in doing so.^ And I'd assume Aiyuk would need to pass a full medical eval
(some might suggest a psych eval as well)