It is beginning to look like Peters and Quinn want to fill all the holes in FA, thus freeing the team to draft whoever they want when they get to #7.
We still have a long long way to go before we get there.
It may be doable but unlikely.
It is beginning to look like Peters and Quinn want to fill all the holes in FA, thus freeing the team to draft whoever they want when they get to #7.
Lots of guys want to be back on the market in their prime to get a big deal. He'll be back on the market at 27 years old which means he could land a large (safety large) 3 year contract to carry him to 30.Don't take this as a complaint but why only two years, for a 24 year old??!!
My pick would be CJ Daniels out of Miami. He’s a stud. Hated losing him to Miami. And I wouldn’t touch a single LSU WR in this draft. Maybe practice squad. Maybe.Swap out Ertz and replace Aiyuk with a WR taken in the draft and I agree.
If we could maneuver to move up from that #3 selection to the second round we could fill both WR and RB with 22 year old players.
I would argue they thought they did that in 2025. We talked about it then (many of us), that they could now do pure BPA in the draft after they seemed like they addressed what they saw as holes from 2024.It is beginning to look like Peters and Quinn want to fill all the holes in FA, thus freeing the team to draft whoever they want when they get to #7.
I don't disagree with the idea. I just thought it would be hard to do.
I thought it was closer to $22M, although I think the only reason he is still here is that Jones wants to work with him.You save almost 17M by cutting Payne... how much for Hargrave on a 1 yr deal? Obviously, if he's hurt, that's a different story ... also, you aren't signing a guy like that for sacks...
You end up in the same location next year and spent less.
Zac Ertz did as much or more in 13 games. Somebody explain why we are happy about this?
I get we plugged a hole in the roster with a young guy who is reasonably productive, but these aren’t great numbers by any stretch.
Try to trade him?This.
But the free agents we acquired in 2025 offseason for the most part were gap fillers and a lot of aging players rather than ones with greater youth and upside potential.I would argue they thought they did that in 2025. We talked about it then (many of us), that they could now do pure BPA in the draft after they seemed like they addressed what they saw as holes from 2024.
I guess it is their standard strategy, but this year they have a clearer idea (we hope) on what their actual holes are.
I thought it was closer to $22M, although I think the only reason he is still here is that Jones wants to work with him.
I agree but I think the coaches have reviewed his performance and think they can get more out of him.I think he's like 28M against the cap, but there's some dead money if we cut, so the net savings is 16.8M... in the end, I'm just arguing that I'd take another DT on a 1 yr deal if we can find similar production elsewhere...
Would have liked him to be signed to a 2 or more year deal. Take what we can get, I guess. Shorter deals 1 to 3 year deals are more common now. Glad we got Oweh on a 4 year deal. Hendrickson finally got paid and glad to see it.