clskinsfan
The Starter
Not sure I would at 7 either. History of his measurables says he will fail. Is what it is.If it’s Bain… Peters isn’t drafting him.
Not sure I would at 7 either. History of his measurables says he will fail. Is what it is.If it’s Bain… Peters isn’t drafting him.
We will never get his 3 cone. And the fact he want s to hide it makes him undraftable in the first round for me. And yeah. He looks just as stiff on tape. No NFL T is sweating David Bailey.Yeah man. Idk
I am starting to think this entire draft is a bad consolation prize.Not a bad consolation prize
Disagree. Dude is 20 years old and absolutely the mold of an elite edge. Watch more tape. Especailly 2024 tape. They moved Faulk inside WAY to much. The scheme is not his fault.

What's the furthest trade back you would still be comfortable with? 9? 10?Someone asked me awhile ago if Styles can play outside backer and I said “yes, but he’s raw.” I continue to stand by that. Sonny Styles, eventually, is what they tried to do with Luvu.
But that takes time to get to.
Downs could be Harrison Smith for us. But… that takes time to get to.
Tate could be… Terry McLaurin for us. That doesn’t take as much time to get to.
Love could be… one of the best backs we’ve ever had.
I’m good with any of these four at this point.
I have my preference order… (Love/Styles, Tate, Downs and then add Delane) but it’s not necessarily locked in stone and I like all four prospects a lot).
The only thing we can do to mess this up imo is to trade back, go too far back, and wind up with none of these guys.
I don’t mention Reese because I think he’s gone by our pick and Bain is on the board. Everyone knows how I feel as it pertains to Bain, but again, I just don’t see him as a guy Peters will draft.
I’m pretty comfortable at 7. I’d be really comfortable at 5.
He will be gone. Probably number two overall to the Jets, but if not, he won’t get past the Titans.I am hoping Bailey is gone now when we pick. He just looked so unathletic in some of those drills.
The more I read about this draft, the more I want Styles, Love, or Downs. We'll see how Tate tests, but those are my top 3

What's the furthest trade back you would still be comfortable with? 9? 10?
Give me any of the OSU guys
Styles is being overhyped after his workout, it happens every year, but by time the draft rolls around the hype will lessen and he will be there at 7 IMO.
The workout did cement him as a top 10 pick though
I like seeing you added Delane to your preference list. I see him as a cleaner pick than many of the others discussed in the group the top like 12.Someone asked me awhile ago if Styles can play outside backer and I said “yes, but he’s raw.” I continue to stand by that. Sonny Styles, eventually, is what they tried to do with Luvu.
But that takes time to get to.
Downs could be Harrison Smith for us. But… that takes time to get to.
Tate could be… Terry McLaurin for us. That doesn’t take as much time to get to.
Love could be… one of the best backs we’ve ever had.
I’m good with any of these four at this point.
I have my preference order… (Love/Styles, Tate, Downs and then add Delane) but it’s not necessarily locked in stone and I like all four prospects a lot).
The only thing we can do to mess this up imo is to trade back, go too far back, and wind up with none of these guys.
I don’t mention Reese because I think he’s gone by our pick and Bain is on the board. Everyone knows how I feel as it pertains to Bain, but again, I just don’t see him as a guy Peters will draft.
I’m pretty comfortable at 7. I’d be really comfortable at 5.