The 2026 Draft Thread - 1st Round - 7th overall

Arm Length is different for a Offensive Tackle and Edge. As an OT, you have to respond to whatever the pass rusher does and if that means going to through your chest with a long arm you have to respond. As an Edge having shorter arm takes certain pass rush moves out of your golf bag so to speak, but there are pass rush moves that are not that dependent on arm length. But the ideal pass rush plan has all the moves in the bag so you can set up the offensive line, hit him with power than beat him with speed or speed to power or set him with speed or speed to power than it him with an inside counter. So not having something in your bag makes it easier on O-Lineman as they know they don't have to defend it. But you can be a good pass rusher with shorter arms, Micah Parson and Hassan Reddick are both under 32 inches and Trey Hendrickson is right at 32 inches. The 30.75 arm measurement on Bain is a verified measurement from Blesto but that doesn't mean that the person at the combine will get the exact same measurement because different people measure slightly different, there is a half inches are variability, so he may yet get 31 inches.
 
Unbelievable how Denver handed the Seahawks a Super Bowl in a way, but kind of impressive they still managed to get their own success this year. Off year for the AFC though.

I think Seattle would have beaten Denver or Buffalo.

And that is Denver with Nix healthy.

Seattle's defense was just that much better at being able to take the ball away and had some performers that really elevated their games during this postseason run.

Teams get on a run and are hard to beat.

I go back to the 2007 Giants defense that just annihilated pass protectors with the front four and propelled the team with some Irish luck from Manning.
 
Its amazing how Denver recovered from that. They lost two first and two second rounders, but lost a lot of salary cap. And yet three years later they make the AFC Championship game. Seattle turned those four picks into Charles Cross, Devon Witherspoon, Bo Mafe and Derrick Hall. Seattle really hit on those picks so its easier to see how they built on their roster with those four extra picks. I'd have to study Denver's drafts/free agency classes to see how they recovered so fast.
 
Its amazing how Denver recovered from that. They lost two first and two second rounders, but lost a lot of salary cap. And yet three years later they make the AFC Championship game. Seattle turned those four picks into Charles Cross, Devon Witherspoon, Bo Mafe and Derrick Hall. Seattle really hit on those picks so its easier to see how they built on their roster with those four extra picks. I'd have to study Denver's drafts/free agency classes to see how they recovered so fast.
Schneider, GM of Seattle is one of the best in the biz.
 
In hindsight, Macdonald was also the real prize of the 2024 coaching candidates to be hired, not Ben Johnson.

As it turned out Johnson wasn’t even ready to be a HC in 2024 by his own admission.

He left quickly enough though once the Detroit bubble burst.

It’s a shame we didn’t show MacDonald more attention during our initial search.
 
In hindsight, Macdonald was also the real prize of the 2024 coaches to be hired, not Ben Johnson.
Oh yeah, I feel like the discussions were which of these two would be the better HC for us. They were distinctly the top two fan favs. I was on the Macdonald bandwagon all the way. I really didn't like or want Johnson. So I was right about MM but wrong about BJ because he would have worked really well with JD
 
I think Seattle would have beaten Denver or Buffalo.

And that is Denver with Nix healthy.

Seattle's defense was just that much better at being able to take the ball away and had some performers that really elevated their games during this postseason run.

Teams get on a run and are hard to beat.

I go back to the 2007 Giants defense that just annihilated pass protectors with the front four and propelled the team with some Irish luck from Manning.
The reason I put that comment into the draft thread, and talked about "Denver handing Seattle" the Super Bowl was because the article was about the Russell Wilson trade and how it led to Seattle's team being stocked.

Of course, as others have said since - Schneider, who (I forgot this, but a friend of mine reminded me sadly) came from OUR system(!!! Thanks Dan), is an amazing GM who turned those picks into what he did.

Those picks though! Man. What a haul Denver gave, and like I said - along with Schneider's handiwork - handed Seattle their Super Bowl. The pieces those picks turned into were critical to their success this year, in the postseason, and even in the big game itself.
 
In no order, right now:

Bain
Love
Downs
Reese
Styles
I feel like at least one if not two of these guys will be there at 7. All the discussions here rarely include a WR, CB or OL going in the top 7. Watching the Pats last is a reminder of just how important the top OL players are and how many teams need help. Same goes for the importance of the DB's after watching the dude that should be a Commander Gonzo as well as the Seahawks loaded defensive backfield.

I also wouldn't count out Faulk of going into the top 7 because there aren't really any top big DL other than him and then Woods at DT which are craved by teams.
 
Last edited:
Of course, as others have said since - Schneider, who (I forgot this, but a friend of mine reminded me sadly) came from OUR system(!!! Thanks Dan), is an amazing GM who turned those picks into what he did.
More like through our system, he was only here for one year and he was on three other teams before us.

But it definitely highlights how the best nfl minds know who the best nfl minds are.

Look at the insane amount of offensive talent that came from the staff Mike shanahan put together here.

Its no coincidence that Marty Schottenheimer brought in John Schneider for the one year he was here.

Greatness can recognize Greatness before anybody else sees it.
 
Notes from the Feb 6 Draft on Draft episode – TE class deep dive

Dallen Bentley
– Cory sees Bentley more as an H-back than a true F or inline Y. He’s a stockier build at 6’2”, 260, with some vertical juice and clear route refinement — uses rocker steps to push DBs back and gain leverage, and both Cory and James agree he has good burst out of breaks. He understands zone windows, but the catch radius is legitimately narrow (only 3 of 16 off-target catches over two feet outside his frame). Not a dynamic athlete, but he can create separation. Blocking was better early in the year; he has decent hand pop but struggles to sustain and isn’t an impact inline blocker. When climbing he tends to overshoot landmarks. Cory thinks James undersells the athlete a bit. After the catch, Cory is lukewarm while James thinks the vision is solid. James’ comp: Brent Celek.

Eli Stowers – James called him the epitome of a slot-only TE. Athletic, fluid, fast through routes, and can separate against LBs and box safeties, but contact disrupts his routes and the blocking just isn’t there. He’s an F-only TE. James currently has him TE7 with an early 5th-round grade (with some TEs still unwatched). Cory mentioned hearing round-2 feedback, which both agree feels high, though Cory wonders if injuries played a role because Stowers looked less dynamic late in the year. Cory was disappointed in the lack of route nuance — very basic setups. Both are notably lower than consensus (which is late 2 / early 3), seeing him more as a Day 3 guy (4th–5th).

Josh Cuevas – Cory was impressed at the Senior Bowl. He plays with intention as a route runner and consistently sets up leverage. Not a great blocker, but serviceable — you’d want more from a true Y, but there’s something to work with. Cory really likes his hands. James sees him as similar to Bentley: shorter, compact TE, solid receiver, serviceable run-game contributor, and he actually likes Cuevas a bit more than Bentley. Change of direction is good, routes are crisp, and he sets up posts and corners well (South Carolina TD). Not a ton of vertical separation, though he flashed it at times (out-and-up vs LSU). James has an early 5th, Cory a mid-4th, and both feel he’s trending upward.

Justin Joly – In 2024 he showed excellent hands in traffic, and that carried into 2025. He can get bodied and still finish catches. Separation dipped in 2025, possibly due to injury and added weight — earlier in the season he looked more fluid. Has rocker steps and real route setup nuance, especially on corners and flags where he bends stems to turn defenders’ hips. Very strong against zone. Blocking improved in 2025; still some issues as a sift blocker firing his hands, but he stays centered, chops his feet, and sustains. At this weight he can play inline or F, but he’s no longer a seam stretcher. Ball skills are outstanding (20-for-28 on contested catches over two seasons, one drop in 2025). Cory gives him an early 4th, James a 3rd.

Michael Trigg – Clear off-field red flags after leaving two programs poorly. Physically impressive (6’3”, 250, 11” hands, 84” wingspan, 34” arms) with a massive catch radius. Long strider, some route nuance but less consistent than others. Runs a lot of choice seams — simple routes, but sets them up reasonably well. Blocking is inconsistent; can engulf smaller players but isn’t reliable. Wins more outside than in the slot and almost feels like a very big X receiver. Likely a ~4.65 runner. James admitted he isn’t sure how to value him but has him TE4 due to upside. Cory has him as TE3 strictly on tape (not factoring in the off the field flags), but noted the alarming drop-rate jump from 3% (2024) to 13% (2025), mostly concentration-related.

Max Klare – Purdue 2024 tape was fun and featured-heavy; Ohio State usage dropped significantly. James still liked the tape. Lower body is filled out, upper body can still add strength, and James thinks he could eventually be an inline TE. Limited inline reps weren’t great (got jolted by MSU DE). As a receiver, he has good speed, acceleration, burst, and YAC ability. Tracking data remains strong. He’s one of the most technically advanced route runners in the class with rocker steps, stair steps, and head fakes. Deceleration is inconsistent. Cory thought he looked a bit stiffer and maybe lost a touch of speed after adding weight, but still a nuanced route runner. Firm hands, limited power as a blocker. Cory has him as TE2.

Kenyon Sadiq – Even with reduced production, both agreed the tape stayed strong. Can play inline or F, separate vertically from the slot, and even align wide. Outstanding YAC ability — hurdle, break tackles, create explosives. Early concentration drops improved as the year went on. James noted YAC efficiency dipped from 2024 to 2025, but it’s still a strength. Route nuance at the top can be inconsistent, but he flashes rocker steps and short-area burst. Solid blocker, especially as a move blocker — widens lanes, finishes when pulling, and consistently affects run paths. Both Cory and James have him as the clear TE1 in the class.

 
Last edited:
Logan with his receivers episode on his draft pod today. Has Lemon as his 5th best WR but seems some of that has to do with size and he thinks he is a pure slot
 
Logan with his receivers episode on his draft pod today. Has Lemon as his 5th best WR but seems some of that has to do with size and he thinks he is a pure slot

His size is no limitation and I don’t see what Logan sees, projecting him to be a pure slot. He fits the mold of the special WR’s that are tearing up this league right now. Size, even speed, doesn’t matter at WR if the rest is there (past certain thresholds of course). I think this is an evaluation Logan will come to regret, and in hindsight some will remark that sometimes, this thing is easy. Sometimes the obviously good players are just good.
 
Notes from the Feb 6 Draft on Draft episode – TE class deep dive

Dallen Bentley
– Cory sees Bentley more as an H-back than a true F or inline Y. He’s a stockier build at 6’2”, 260, with some vertical juice and clear route refinement — uses rocker steps to push DBs back and gain leverage, and both Cory and James agree he has good burst out of breaks. He understands zone windows, but the catch radius is legitimately narrow (only 3 of 16 off-target catches over two feet outside his frame). Not a dynamic athlete, but he can create separation. Blocking was better early in the year; he has decent hand pop but struggles to sustain and isn’t an impact inline blocker. When climbing he tends to overshoot landmarks. Cory thinks James undersells the athlete a bit. After the catch, Cory is lukewarm while James thinks the vision is solid. James’ comp: Brent Celek.

Eli Stowers – James called him the epitome of a slot-only TE. Athletic, fluid, fast through routes, and can separate against LBs and box safeties, but contact disrupts his routes and the blocking just isn’t there. He’s an F-only TE. James currently has him TE7 with an early 5th-round grade (with some TEs still unwatched). Cory mentioned hearing round-2 feedback, which both agree feels high, though Cory wonders if injuries played a role because Stowers looked less dynamic late in the year. Cory was disappointed in the lack of route nuance — very basic setups. Both are notably lower than consensus (which is late 2 / early 3), seeing him more as a Day 3 guy (4th–5th).

Josh Cuevas – Cory was impressed at the Senior Bowl. He plays with intention as a route runner and consistently sets up leverage. Not a great blocker, but serviceable — you’d want more from a true Y, but there’s something to work with. Cory really likes his hands. James sees him as similar to Bentley: shorter, compact TE, solid receiver, serviceable run-game contributor, and he actually likes Cuevas a bit more than Bentley. Change of direction is good, routes are crisp, and he sets up posts and corners well (South Carolina TD). Not a ton of vertical separation, though he flashed it at times (out-and-up vs LSU). James has an early 5th, Cory a mid-4th, and both feel he’s trending upward.

Justin Joly – In 2024 he showed excellent hands in traffic, and that carried into 2025. He can get bodied and still finish catches. Separation dipped in 2025, possibly due to injury and added weight — earlier in the season he looked more fluid. Has rocker steps and real route setup nuance, especially on corners and flags where he bends stems to turn defenders’ hips. Very strong against zone. Blocking improved in 2025; still some issues as a sift blocker firing his hands, but he stays centered, chops his feet, and sustains. At this weight he can play inline or F, but he’s no longer a speed stretcher. Ball skills are outstanding (20-for-28 on contested catches over two seasons, one drop in 2025). Cory gives him an early 4th, James a 3rd.

Michael Trigg – Clear off-field red flags after leaving two programs poorly. Physically impressive (6’3”, 250, 11” hands, 84” wingspan, 34” arms) with a massive catch radius. Long strider, some route nuance but less consistent than others. Runs a lot of choice seams — simple routes, but sets them up reasonably well. Blocking is inconsistent; can engulf smaller players but isn’t reliable. Wins more outside than in the slot and almost feels like a very big X receiver. Likely a ~4.65 runner. James admitted he isn’t sure how to value him but has him TE4 due to upside. Cory has him as TE3 strictly on tape (not factoring in the off the field flags), but noted the alarming drop-rate jump from 3% (2024) to 13% (2025), mostly concentration-related.

Max Klare – Purdue 2024 tape was fun and featured-heavy; Ohio State usage dropped significantly. James still liked the tape. Lower body is filled out, upper body can still add strength, and James thinks he could eventually be an inline TE. Limited inline reps weren’t great (got jolted by MSU DE). As a receiver, he has good speed, acceleration, burst, and YAC ability. Tracking data remains strong. He’s one of the most technically advanced route runners in the class with rocker steps, stair steps, and head fakes. Deceleration is inconsistent. Cory thought he looked a bit stiffer and maybe lost a touch of speed after adding weight, but still a nuanced route runner. Firm hands, limited power as a blocker. Cory has him as TE2.

Kenyon Sadiq – Even with reduced production, both agreed the tape stayed strong. Can play inline or F, separate vertically from the slot, and even align wide. Outstanding YAC ability — hurdle, break tackles, create explosives. Early concentration drops improved as the year went on. James noted YAC efficiency dipped from 2024 to 2025, but it’s still a strength. Route nuance at the top can be inconsistent, but he flashes rocker steps and short-area burst. Solid blocker, especially as a move blocker — widens lanes, finishes when pulling, and consistently affects run paths. Both Cory and James have him as the clear TE1 in the class.


I initially thought this draft was going to fairly strong for TE's in the mid rounds but I was wrong. It seems pretty weak, even Klare hasn't proven to be what I expected he'd be this year. A couple guys that I have had interest in are Joly and Royer. At this point I feel stronger that the team needs to grab a TE in free agency
 
His size is no limitation and I don’t see what Logan sees, projecting him to be a pure slot. He fits the mold of the special WR’s that are tearing up this league right now. Size, even speed, doesn’t matter at WR if the rest is there (past certain thresholds of course). I think this is an evaluation Logan will come to regret, and in hindsight some will remark that sometimes, this thing is easy. Sometimes the obviously good players are just good.

I agree. Logan’s hit rate doesn’t seem great but I like listening to him unleashed giving us his raw thoughts

Btw he has Boston as his #2
 
Having grown up with the Smurfs, Ricky Sanders, and Gary Clark, I think I value size differently than many. Sure, it's good to a tall redzone threat or possession guy, but I think you also need someone who just knows how to separate, run routes, and has sticky hands.
 
Having grown up with the Smurfs, Ricky Sanders, and Gary Clark, I think I value size differently than many. Sure, it's good to a tall redzone threat or possession guy, but I think you also need someone who just knows how to separate, run routes, and has sticky hands.
All of this is true, but I would say, there are some advantages on having a huge catch radius that usually comes with larger sized receivers. If your QB is off, a guy with a large catch radius can still manage to reel in a lot of those passes. Personally, I agree with you - but I think some analysts get really enamored with this idea that you get a WR with a large catch radius and if your QB throws a less accurate ball, you still get a completion. I don't think that's such a winning formula; you will need a certain level of accuracy whereby that "large catch radius" probably isn't as valuable as other factors and certainly shouldn't be looked at in isolation.

This (way more detailed!) analysis seems to at least somewhat agree:
 
“Catch radius” isn’t exclusive to large receivers because it all starts with body positioning, sometimes jump timing, eye discipline, plucking ability, and in some cases the discipline to utilize late hands AND eye discipline to avoid warning a DB the ball is closing, especially in the red zone.

But large receivers who also have all that, yeah they’ll be superior in terms of catch radius. But it isn’t as common as you’d think. And often the need to make a contested catch is a clue that a guy isn’t separating and/or his QB is placing the ball poorly. Sometimes it’s unavoidable, but contested catch % in college prospects often reveals a list of guys who can’t get open and HAVE to win that way, even against lesser athletes before they hit the NFL. Those guys bust often. Catch radius isn’t the same as contested catch ability, but I just wanted to expand a little on things that can seem positive but actually are often a red flag.
 
“Catch radius” isn’t exclusive to large receivers because it all starts with body positioning, sometimes jump timing, eye discipline, plucking ability, and in some cases the discipline to utilize late hands AND eye discipline to avoid warning a DB the ball is closing, especially in the red zone.

But large receivers who also have all that, yeah they’ll be superior in terms of catch radius. But it isn’t as common as you’d think. And often the need to make a contested catch is a clue that a guy isn’t separating and/or his QB is placing the ball poorly. Sometimes it’s unavoidable, but contested catch % in college prospects often reveals a list of guys who can’t get open and HAVE to win that way, even against lesser athletes before they hit the NFL. Those guys bust often. Catch radius isn’t the same as contested catch ability, but I just wanted to expand a little on things that can seem positive but actually are often a red flag.
Yes, "catch radius" is not always calculated the same way - and the way I wrote my prior post made it sound exclusive to larger receivers, but I intended to imply that all else being equal (and I think we are trying to find great receivers, so that kind of implies all of the general stats are assumed as "high level"), additional height will indeed increase the catch radius generally (there could be some cases with taller person+shorter arms, and shorter person+longer arms, but those would be outliers). You are definitely right, that ability to pluck the ball (strong hands) is critical in real terms, and that is not exclusive to taller receivers, but the reason taller receivers get more credit in catch radius calculations is probably because they have an advantage if the catch is contested; the height is a clear advantage. Also, I don't believe many catch radius calculations make an estimation on "hand strength" or "pluckability" - they seem to focus (made a quick look) more exclusively on speed, height, and arm length - the more easily and commonly measured stats for comparison sake most likely.

Also just to reiterate, I tend to not believe that height is critical. If everything is the same and you have height added on, sure - but height in the mix with other factors not the same, I'd start to discount the height pretty quickly (which will be the typical reality). I think you were saying the same.
 
There’s only one LSU player I really want us to draft this year and he could be had in the 3rd or 4th round

He is PERFECT for the Daronte attitude era. Has a little ST to his game too. He plays nasty and in your face. Always goes for the punch out while wrapping up. Just a beast.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top