The 2026 Draft Thread - 1st Round - 7th overall

Noah Brown peniciled in as Z. Terry as X.

McCaffrey played slot in college, more of a natural slot so far in the NFL. Lane also slot. Deebo played slot and Z but arguably more of a natural slot WR but either way he's more of a gadget player than traditional WR.

The only natural outside WR backup, Dyami's role who can play both outside WR positions was Chris Moore. The odds that Chris Moore would end up your starter was pretty high.

Yeah to use a baseball analogy, you can make your third baseman play shortstop and maybe you can band aide a game or two that way but that's no way to have a season.
Not asking this out of disagreement, but why is McCaffrey seen as a slot receiver? I just mean, he’s basically the same size as Dyami (a little taller), with basically the same speed. Is it problems w/ playing against press man? Or he needs to develop more to handle those duties (ie he’s more comfortable in the slot because that’s where he’s played more)? Something else?
 
Not asking this out of disagreement, but why is McCaffrey seen as a slot receiver? I just mean, he’s basically the same size as Dyami (a little taller), with basically the same speed. Is it problems w/ playing against press man? Or he needs to develop more to handle those duties (ie he’s more comfortable in the slot because that’s where he’s played more)? Something else?

I'll start with that's what he played in college. His college coach was asked after they drafted him, and he doubled down that he thought he was suited to the slot and not the outside. For a WR who is a convert from QB and hasn't been playing the spot for a long time, you don't have to worry the same way about releases among other things playing out of the slot.
 
The PFF guys did a fix the franchise segment on the Commanders and they really loved Jermod McCoy as a scheme fit for us in a trade down. The ACL scares me. We need a hit with this pick. We don't have enough roster talent to miss, or grab a Jaire Alexander that's good for 2 years and then always injured.



I would low key love this move if we are very active in free Agency and can shore up the roster. For instance, if we can grab Hendrickson, a decent starting CB, Aiyuk and Pitts, then Love could be a killer get for us. Terry is still getting older and we will still need to get younger at the outside receiver position, but we can probably do that fter next year. Love, Terry, Pitts, Aiyuk, and Lane would give us a lot of guys that can spread and push the field at different levels. And I think this OL with Conerly having an offseason under his belt may finally be ready for a big investment in RB.

Part of what makes Love so appealing is what a weapon he is in the passing game. It's like he could be RB1 and Austin Ekeler on the field at the same time. Having previously invested a lot in trading for Christian McCaffrey and reaped a ton of benefit from it, I wonder if that could actually be something that Peters would consider.

I watched that segment last week from PFF, it was a good one. They did several scenarios and were aggressive in FA leading into that draft.

Yeah while I am not married to J. Love at that pick, I'd absolutely love it.
 
If Washington doesn’t come away from the offseason with a legit pass rushing prospect or free agent AND a pass receiving tight end I am going to scream 🙀
 
As excited as I could be for some of these prospects, Love, Reese, I keep coming back to Tate. Our lack of weapons outside this year really affected Jayden, and there is nothing more important than maximizing his talent and progress.

Tate would be such a tremendous weapon and security blanket. He’s 20 years old, has size and plays big, is a great deep threat. He could play through Jayden’s prime years. I feel like Jayden and Tate could anchor and stabilize. our offensive skill positions for a long time.

Also, I know you liked him in that draft, SIP, but Skattebo is so easy to like.


 
The PFF guys did a fix the franchise segment on the Commanders and they really loved Jermod McCoy as a scheme fit for us in a trade down. The ACL scares me. We need a hit with this pick. We don't have enough roster talent to miss, or grab a Jaire Alexander that's good for 2 years and then always injured.



I would low key love this move if we are very active in free Agency and can shore up the roster. For instance, if we can grab Hendrickson, a decent starting CB, Aiyuk and Pitts, then Love could be a killer get for us. Terry is still getting older and we will still need to get younger at the outside receiver position, but we can probably do that fter next year. Love, Terry, Pitts, Aiyuk, and Lane would give us a lot of guys that can spread and push the field at different levels. And I think this OL with Conerly having an offseason under his belt may finally be ready for a big investment in RB.

Part of what makes Love so appealing is what a weapon he is in the passing game. It's like he could be RB1 and Austin Ekeler on the field at the same time. Having previously invested a lot in trading for Christian McCaffrey and reaped a ton of benefit from it, I wonder if that could actually be something that Peters would consider.

Somehow despite all our cap space (going into our third straight year of being near the top) we never have an offseason like this, though. I’m not looking for reckless “Dream Team” bullshit but I really need AP to show some urgency and spend some money this offseason. He needs to be aggressive, we can keep a healthy cap future but this doesn’t need to be a thrift shop operation like it was under Bruce Allen.

And if it is, I’ll start having questions towards Josh Harris and wonder if he’s installing a strict ‘cash cap’ on AP that makes us operate more cheaply than we have to under the guise of keeping a healthy cap. If that’s the case we’ll never truly compete with the teams who are willing to play salary cap games and burn liquid cash to compete at the highest levels, instead we’ll have to draft really well and get lucky. Which is not looking realistic right now.

We need to be a team willing to spend cash. There’s no reason we can’t be, and we have the QB to justify it.
 
Somehow despite all our cap space (going into our third straight year of being near the top) we never have an offseason like this, though. I’m not looking for reckless “Dream Team” bullshit but I really need AP to show some urgency and spend some money this offseason. He needs to be aggressive, we can keep a healthy cap future but this doesn’t need to be a thrift shop operation like it was under Bruce Allen.

And if it is, I’ll start having questions towards Josh Harris and wonder if he’s installing a strict ‘cash cap’ on AP that makes us operate more cheaply than we have to under the guise of keeping a healthy cap. If that’s the case we’ll never truly compete with the teams who are willing to play salary cap games and burn liquid cash to compete at the highest levels, instead we’ll have to draft really well and get lucky. Which is not looking realistic right now.

We need to be a team willing to spend cash. There’s no reason we can’t be, and we have the QB to justify it.

I'd be surprised if Harris put any breaks on Peters' spending considering reading about him, he supposedly is in a spend whatever you need mode to make this team a winner on every front.

To use a stock analogy, Peters approach is to buy companies on a discount, reasonable PE ratios, low risk moves -- Warren Buffett style. He doesn't like to shoot for the bigger high growth-more expensive stocks, no Apple, no Google, no Nvida, etc because if you buy them on the rise -- they can crash and you can look like a fool.

I think he'd defend it as low risk-high reward after season 1 because they almost made the SB that year so he doubled down on it two years in a row. And while he was mostly a successful value investor in year 2 -- Kinlaw looks like a good signing, Jakob Martin, Will Harris. He just didn't do enough. He swung for singles.

But everything I've read about him gives me confidence he will bounce back.

A. I've heard he's competitive as heck, insanely so, lives and dies by his successes and failures so this has to be eating at him

B. He flat out said he learns more from failures than successes

C. He clearly sees this as a SB window and the opportunity won't last forever. So I expect him to be aggressive.

There are three things they accomplished this season that IMO sets them up better for success next year.

A. I think they will regain their edge. lol I used the Rocky 3 analogy a lot this year including before the summer started. Like or not like Peters and Quinn, I got no doubt they are competitive as heck, work their asses off and will learn from this,

B. For Peters faults this off season he has IMO accomplished a key thing -- the O line, its strong and deep. Aside from QB that's the hardest position to build. If they add weapons to this team the work done on the O line should compound those additions ala the Eagles the previous season adding Barkley.

C. they realized Joe Whitt is a problem and the coaching on that side is a problem
 
I'd be surprised if Harris put any breaks on Peters' spending considering reading about him, he supposedly is in a spend whatever you need mode to make this team a winner on every front.

To use a stock analogy, Peters approach is to buy companies on a discount, reasonable PE ratios, low risk moves -- Warren Buffett style. He doesn't like to shoot for the bigger high growth-more expensive stocks, no Apple, no Google, no Nvida, etc because if you buy them on the rise -- they can crash and you can look like a fool.

I think he'd defend it as low risk-high reward after season 1 because they almost made the SB that year so he doubled down on it two years in a row. And while he was mostly a successful value investor in year 2 -- Kinlaw looks like a good signing, Jakob Martin, Will Harris. He just didn't do enough. He swung for singles.

But everything I've read about him gives me confidence he will bounce back.

A. I've heard he's competitive as heck, insanely so, lives and dies by his successes and failures so this has to be eating at him

B. He flat out said he learns more from failures than successes

C. He clearly sees this as a SB window and the opportunity won't last forever. So I expect him to be aggressive.

There are three things they accomplished this season that IMO sets them up better for success next year.

A. I think they will regain their edge. lol I used the Rocky 3 analogy a lot this year including before the summer started. Like or not like Peters and Quinn, I got no doubt they are competitive as heck, work their asses off and will learn from this,

B. For Peters faults this off season he has IMO accomplished a key thing -- the O line, its strong and deep. Aside from QB that's the hardest position to build. If they add weapons to this team the work done on the O line should compound those additions ala the Eagles the previous season adding Barkley.

C. they realized Joe Whitt is a problem and the coaching on that side is a problem
With our lack of leftover talent and the injuries, I am making no judgment on Peters based on this year
 
With our lack of leftover talent and the injuries, I am making no judgment on Peters based on this year

I am expecting mistakes from any GM of course. There are some things I like that he's done, some not. Overall, more good, than bad.

But I definitely want to see all these guys -- Peters, Quinn, Jayden on a revenge tour in 2026.

Among other reasons, I feared some complaceny and comfort and a lack of edge from these guys after everyone sucking up to those 3 all off season.

The one upside of this going THIS bad, is how could you not refind your edge after a season like this?

I'll use another team as an example. the Vikings. They win 14 games last year. O'Connell lauded as a dude whose crap doesn't stink and can start any Qb and they will be Joe Montana under his guidance. But nope. It doesn't work that easy. And they fell to earth.

I don't fault Jayden at all for this season. He had nothing to work with. But Peters and Quinn came off a bit arrogant. And not in a snobby way. They are both by reputation super nice guys. But they came off to me with the vibe that they were feeling themselves too much. Same thing with O'Connell -- who is also by reputation a super nice guy.

But I think when everyone says you walk on water, you start believing it and lose your edge. I use the Rocky 3 analogy this summer. It felt like Mr. T needs to knock these guys out to refind their edge. And heck that has happened in spades.

But coming from someone who was VERY concerned about all of this headed to this season. for the same reason I was concerned I am not concerned about any of it for next season. Nada. I can't wait to see these guys bounce back, and I'd put money on them doing so.
 
Last edited:
I'd be surprised if Harris put any breaks on Peters' spending considering reading about him, he supposedly is in a spend whatever you need mode to make this team a winner on every front.

To use a stock analogy, Peters approach is to buy companies on a discount, reasonable PE ratios, low risk moves -- Warren Buffett style. He doesn't like to shoot for the bigger high growth-more expensive stocks, no Apple, no Google, no Nvida, etc because if you buy them on the rise -- they can crash and you can look like a fool.

I think he'd defend it as low risk-high reward after season 1 because they almost made the SB that year so he doubled down on it two years in a row. And while he was mostly a successful value investor in year 2 -- Kinlaw looks like a good signing, Jakob Martin, Will Harris. He just didn't do enough. He swung for singles.

But everything I've read about him gives me confidence he will bounce back.

A. I've heard he's competitive as heck, insanely so, lives and dies by his successes and failures so this has to be eating at him

B. He flat out said he learns more from failures than successes

C. He clearly sees this as a SB window and the opportunity won't last forever. So I expect him to be aggressive.

There are three things they accomplished this season that IMO sets them up better for success next year.

A. I think they will regain their edge. lol I used the Rocky 3 analogy a lot this year including before the summer started. Like or not like Peters and Quinn, I got no doubt they are competitive as heck, work their asses off and will learn from this,

B. For Peters faults this off season he has IMO accomplished a key thing -- the O line, its strong and deep. Aside from QB that's the hardest position to build. If they add weapons to this team the work done on the O line should compound those additions ala the Eagles the previous season adding Barkley.

C. they realized Joe Whitt is a problem and the coaching on that side is a problem

Last offseason right before FA started, Peters had a presser where he was asked if they’d be very active given our massive cap space. And he hedged, the answer he gave was that “we operate off of more of a cash budget”.

Right then and there my radar pinged and I’ve been keeping a very close eye on our spending habits ever since. In that moment I knew we wouldn’t actually get any of the big money guys everyone was projecting to us, and I watched the Patriots and Cardinals get them instead. Needless to say, the FA period that followed that statement from AP, despite happening after we made the NFCCG and had tons of cap space…it felt like a Bruce Allen offseason.

So my antenna is up and I’m worried. I hope now after seeing that approach NOT work, Harris will readjust his priorities. Because this team is not going to be a huge draw in the new stadium by 2030 if they don’t build a successful team around Daniels however they can. And that includes being willing to be top cash spenders when necessary. Cash spend is different from utilizing cap space, and I’m worried that AP is a little shackled in that regard.

I’ve been afraid to say it out loud up until now…but is that the downside of having an owner also laying out cash for multiple other pro sports franchises and their guaranteed contracts, who had to build the biggest ownership coalition in history to get the buying power together to pay for this NFL franchise?

I really like what Harris is about (and anything is better than Snyder) but I worry that he isn’t as liquid as some of the owners who are willing to spend cold hard cash in pursuit of greatness.

Like I said, AP all but directly stated he’s on a cash budget that’s measured differently than the salary cap “space” we’re allotted that you can play games with. I was surprised he said it at the time, but he did. That worries me, because that’s not true for every team and it adds something non-football to the equation that limits us (and AP).

There’s a cash spend floor that we’ll have to hit regardless, and I’m not saying we’re as cheap as the Bengals have been necessarily. But the top teams with the wealthiest owners can play games with the cap and burn cash to be more competitive, and if we can’t do that then we won’t be firing on all cylinders ever compared to the few franchises who can. Right now I’m aware of the Rams and Eagles as franchises who are willing to manipulate the cap with cash to have it work to their advantage. I’m sure there are more.

Until I see us spend, really spend, in FA…I’ll be looking sideways at Harris after those AP comments. As much as I like him so far on everything else.
 
Last edited:
With our lack of leftover talent and the injuries, I am making no judgment on Peters based on this year

Just so long as you look at it rationally and recognize that AP also shares some of the blame for the lack of talent and injuries on this roster. He’s no victim, he built much of this roster, brought in some of the injury-prone guys who have contributed to the IR domino effect, and his draft picks and FA picks are the guys underperforming under the coaching staff he built. He has blame here to work through as well, we need better from AP to get where we want to go. We all have to acknowledge that and not treat him like the savior just because he’s the first real GM of (many of) our lifetimes

Yes, he started at a massive disadvantage after the Rivera years. But he’s not doing himself many favors through two offseasons so far. He shares the blame for where we are and I bet he recognizes that.
 
Last edited:
Last offseason right before FA started, Peters had a presser where he was asked if they’d be very active given our massive cap space. And he hedged, the answer he gave was that “we operate off of more of a cash budget”.

Right then and there my radar pinged and I’ve been keeping a very close eye on our spending habits ever since. In that moment I knew we wouldn’t actually get any of the big money guys everyone was projecting to us, and I watched the Patriots and Cardinals get them instead. Needless to say, the FA period that followed that statement from AP, despite happening after we made the NFCCG and had tons of cap space…it felt like a Bruce Allen offseason.

So my antenna is up and I’m worried. I hope now after seeing that approach NOT work, Harris will readjust his priorities. Because this team is not going to be a huge draw in the new stadium by 2030 if they don’t build a successful team around Daniels however they can. And that includes being willing to be top cash spenders when necessary. Cash spend is different from utilizing cap space, and I’m worried that AP is a little shackled in that regard.

I’ve been afraid to say it out loud up until now…but is that the downside of having an owner also laying out cash for multiple other pro sports franchises and their guaranteed contracts, who had to build the biggest ownership coalition in history to get the buying power together to pay for this NFL franchise?

I really like what Harris is about (and anything is better than Snyder) but I worry that he isn’t as liquid as some of the owners who are willing to spend cold hard cash in pursuit of greatness.

Like I said, AP all but directly stated he’s on a cash budget that’s measured differently than the salary cap “space” we’re allotted that you can play games with. I was surprised he said it at the time, but he did. That worries me, because that’s not true for every team and it adds something non-football to the equation that limits us (and AP).

There’s a cash spend floor that we’ll have to hit regardless, and I’m not saying we’re as cheap as the Bengals have been necessarily. But the top teams with the wealthiest owners can play games with the cap and burn cash to be more competitive, and if we can’t do that then we won’t be firing on all cylinders ever compared to the few franchises who can. Right now I’m aware of the Rams and Eagles as franchises who are willing to manipulate the cap with cash to have it work to their advantage. I’m sure there are more.

Until I see us spend, really spend, in FA…I’ll be looking sideways at Harris after those AP comments. As much as I like him so far on everything else.

I am trying to place where I read it, but read multiple articles about Harris signing off on anything this coaching staff, players, front office wants. You want this state of the art equipment for this or that, you got it, etc. Anything and everything.

As for FA to your point, it's possible they have limits, don't know of course, but they spent 110 million in FA last year and were one of the higher spenders in guaranteed money. Even if that's their budget, which is very good -- not great, I'd like them to spend their money differently.

Also, after this season that just happened, I'd presume they'd sign off on them being more aggressive. The most aggressive FA team this year was NE and by a mile, and they killed it.
 
I am trying to place where I read it, but read multiple articles about Harris signing off on anything this coaching staff, players, front office wants. You want this state of the art equipment for this or that, you got it, etc. Anything and everything.

As for FA to your point, it's possible they have limits, don't know of course, but they spent 110 million in FA last year and were one of the higher spenders in guaranteed money. Even if that's their budget, which is very good -- not great, I'd like them to spend their money differently.

Also, after this season that just happened, I'd presume they'd sign off on them being more aggressive. The most aggressive FA team this year was NE and by a mile, and they killed it.

For sure, on the infrastructure stuff and in general, this ownership group has been willing to outlay cash. I’m not questioning their commitment to that sort of thing.

But on top of paying for things like big renovations and billions for a new stadium (and the money towards lobbying to get it approved in the first place), which at least pad the overall value of the franchise…paying out hundreds of millions in guarantees to players during big offseasons can definitely be a different sort of cash spend. That all has to go into escrow immediately and the less liquid owners hate that.

I just can’t shake that comment from AP. It was very specific, very honest, and said in a tone like it was meant to calm the big spending expectations the reporter was implying with the question. Kind of a “well you laymen may know about the salary cap and think that’s what it’s all about, but actually there’s a deeper thing here I have to consider—so manage your expectations” type thing

I agree that given their hunger to win as a group, even if my fears are correct I’d expect some changes to the approach. No one wants to have to point to a bad or mediocre team while they try to sell expensive PSL’s for the 2030 stadium opening in the coming years. They need to get good, and fast.
 
I want 0 part of Aiyuk. He got his contract voided and told the union he didn't care. That's a major red flag.

Downs will be like Hamilton, need a good DC to maximize his value. Hamilton would have been a bust here...like Forbes was. I was wrong about him, he was fantastic last night.

Totally in agreement 49ers were fools to pay him that contract.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 7, Members: 0, Guests: 7)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top