- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 55,812
- Reaction score
- 17,402
- Points
- 2,743
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch

- Alma Mater

The only problem is if the government starts mandating that it retain copies. If there becomes established data housing locations for it then that becomes a target; a target that exposes everyone. A little different than one hospital having a databreach. The healthcare industry was the 3rd worst industry when it came to being infected with malware, viruses, having computers participating in botnets (ie: being controlled remotely), and having data breaches (at least it used to, like 2-3 years ago, it may have improved...) This will make finding the information easier.
We'll see. I don't see a way to avoid transitioning to that system and I don't see a way to keep it secure. It seems inevitable at this point.
Edit: I recognize I'm not saying anything you don't already know. (Did I get all the double negatives right?) Just participating in the conversation![]()
I agree. In fact, I've argued, despite being up to my eyeballs in healthcare infomatics (it's a big chunk of what I do), that I'm not convinced we provide safer, better care with the advent of computerized medical records than we did before. It COULD be safer and better, but largely, we're just typing what we used to write and day-to-day access of medical information is more difficult in a lot of ways, not better or more efficient. I could demonstrate the truth of this in about 5 minutes in front of an electronic medical record as opposed to the old paper charting/documentation system we used to use. I know that's veering away from the 'cloud technology' discussion, but one of the biggest assumptions in healthcare today is that electronic data entry, review, and storage is better. In a lot of ways, it's an epic myth. And our government is forcing it on us on a massive scale. Because they know SO much more than we do
