Thanks both of you.
As for the rest. Uh oh. Now you've done it.

Yep. They're mine. And you bet. They have been edited to one degree or another. It depends on several factors on what I do to edit them. Time and light permitting,I'll try to get the best one shot that I can,(based on the pic and histogram). After that,it's a matter of what I call "running them through the wash." I shoot all the pics in raw for so I can manipulate the pic a bit more. I then run them through Elements to clean up the contrast,sharpen them up,and maybe darken,lighten,or both some spots in the image using brightness and contrast controls. Sometimes,that doesn't work out which is why I will also bracket the shots or turn one shot in to 2 different exposures and blend them to together. I tend to do all of the above with many pics in order to see what different looks I can get. Basically,I get real artsy sometimes with these images.
First and last ones I used a exposure fusion feature I have on one program. Turned out I really didn't need to do that after I just ran the solo pics through the wash. Though it did help sharpen the image. Exposure fusion btw,is basically taking the best of the 3 or more images,(taken with different exposures and such),and merging them. This can help in broad shots like the ones above in that you can increase the depth of field where clarity and sharpness are concerned. The middle pic is an HDR one. I felt the image,(part of Bryce Canyon),could lend itself to such an effect. Kind of gives it a painting type look. Though a raw image cleaned up doesn't look that much different. Details thing. It's easy to go overboard with such programs,especially HDR ones since they can remove much of the shadows in the image and it can result in something that looks flat and 2 dimensional.
Oh. I also have several lens filters. Standard UV and polarizing filters plus a neutral density one I use for bright,sunlit shots and long exposure shots,(like when I shoot moving water). Hope to get some more sometime down the road.