Random Commanders Thoughts


There was so much traffic back and forth about Samaje Perrine run. Zac, allow me to introduce Samaje to you; I take it you do not know him. He's ok but you don't decide the Super Bowl with him. OH, sorry, I'm a day late with this information apparently. I couldn't believe it. With Joe Mixon? I mean, I get that you named Perrine your "third down back" but really? In the Super Bowl? I still don't get it, at all.
 
Joe Mixon was as fired up and running violently as I've ever seen him. Not to put the ball in his hands in crucial moments is difficult to understand for sure.
 
This reminds me of when Gruden would run Chris Thompson up the middle on 3rd and 1. There was always a back better at getting 1 yd, but coaches think they can trick the defense. I always hate when coaches go down without their best player getting the ball. It should have been Mixon on that play. Not saying he would have picked it up, but I would still like his chances over Perine in that spot.
 
Agreed. To be fair, Mixon was stopped a couple times in short yardage situations. But I agree he should've been the guy there.
 
As good as Mixon is / can be... he's not the reason they were there. I've always believed you ride the horse that got you there. The ball should have been in Burrow's hands. Play action boot and throw it to any of those weapons (including Mixon) out of the backfield. i woudln't consider the Perine to be unpredictable, i'd argue the opposite.

I also have to give proper kudos to Donald there because there are about 3 people on this planet that are able to make that play as effectively as he did. A lot of DT may have been able to get a hand or arm on Perine, but very few are able to stop a 230+ NFL RB with 1 hand like that.
 
The injury to Burrow was a killer. Previous to that, he'd taken off several times for big plays.
 
These last few posts sum up a lot of my thoughts on it - for me personally, I would run Mixon in that situation even with a healthy Burrow. You have to remember, Mixon was getting good yardage. I mean, maybe it's less about running Mixon there and more about running Mixon *more* and saving Burrow some of the hits he took. They were running effectively, they probably could have afforded it a bit more. The modern NFL Offenses are tilting towards being idiotically tied to the pass. McVay loves to pass, you can tell just like everyone else, but he also knows that running can do some real damage in a lot of ways. It's hard to understate the importance of running, even when it's largely ineffective. That last part is what Scott doesn't understand at all.

All that said, I would not have had a major problem with a healthy Burrow getting the opportunity to get that first down. In that situation, with that clock? Definitely. I am only saying that in my opinion, Zac went with the worst option, and this is also because we have seen Samaje not get that pickup many times. I like him, but I have seen the big moments get the best of him (I'm not talking about Super Bowl saving drives, I am talking about regular season 3rd downs). I feel like he is not a lock in those situations. Maybe the Bengals have had a different experience with him though.

Just watching the actual game, though - man, Mixon looked like a force. When I saw them hand it off to Samaje, I was pretty shocked at the decision, but also I was unsurprised at the outcome.
 
The only thing I will say in Perine’s defense is that no RB gets a first down if there’s no hole there. Mixon got stopped prior to that on short yardage downs more than once.
 
That one hurts. I have watched more Charley Taylor highlights than any other classic Redskin. Dominant player. RIP sir. #respect
 
Yeah, definitely one of the cornerstones of my earliest years as a fan.
 
They still won’t admit they were wrong. They are blaming it on the fans not liking it. I’m guessing the league had some input on this as well. Just more of the clown show.
 
I would’ve preferred ‘Sons of Washington’ across the top instead of ‘Washington Football’ which is of course accurate but doesn’t have a lot of meaning. If they were looking to tie the new to the old that would’ve been a no-brainer.
 
I still do not like the 1932 though, Wright is like the Mr Bean of team presidents. I mean how many ways can they screw this up?

No that’s NOT a challenge their Wright.
 
If they “listened to the fans” in the 1st place they would never have messed up this rebrand as bad as they did.
 
The mistake was intentionally done to consume tv segments and news articles. Less exposure to the real dirt on a the team.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 11, Members: 0, Guests: 11)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top