I love how the metric changes for Qbs.
Joe Theismann never sees a ring without the Hogs and John Riggins carrying him there.
Doug Williams and Mark Rypien never get a ring without the Hogs, running game and defense provided for them.
Nobody has ever claimed that a QB doesn't need the pieces around him to win. Theismann is a good comparison for
#8 . Both had limited ability. Though Theismann's desire for winning was more visible to the naked eye. Both benefited from the system tailored to their strengths. But Theismann played for the best coach, ever. Gibbs could win with
#8 . Gruden has shown no signs of being able to win with, well, anybody.
Williams and Rypien are classic examples of average/below average QB's winning a Championship
because of their surrounding cast. Of course
#8 could do the same thing. But so could half, or more, of the QB's in the league.
When it comes to Cousins, he's not required anything except a few street free agents and 28th ranked defense and a bum special teams.
I believe our SBXVII winning team had the most free agents of any team to ever win it. And.........the Pearl Harbor Crew.
Was he responsible for blowing a 15 point lead in New Orleans inside of two minutes?
Ah yes. He and the offense couldn't pick up the game clinching 6 inches needed to secure the victory. Everybody knows you can't give Drew Brees the ball with enough time left to kick your ass. People say that about
#8 ....never.
Last year in Detroit, he engineered the drive that gave us the lead with one minute left on the clock. Was he responsible for blowing that lead inside of a minute?
Again, with 1 minute left on the clock, Stafford has a history of winning drives. He's respected as a guy who's done it to a bunch of teams.
#8 , is not, and has not.
This sounds like the thinking of Bruce. It's why no one can win here.
I'm sure many felt that way back in the 50's. They were wrong too.
Here's NFL.com's take with Charley Casserly chiming in.
The .com has people advocating both sides of the argument. That's normal, and will continue.
And as much as you despise Bruce, remind me WTF Charlie Casserly ever did as a GM that was special. Oh, my bad, ex GM. Because nobody thinks much of his ability either. When he got the title here, the team was already established. He rode that wave for 3 years and got a ring. From that point forward, the team got horribly worse. From the time Gibbs left, he went to hell in a hand bag. Gibbs made Beathard look better than he was. Though he was good. Casserly fell flat on his face. He then had a 4 year disastrous record in Houston. And nobody has wanted him since, for anything more than talking. So please, let's not give his opinion any more credence than Bucky Brooks opposing view.