But if you go max protect, you’re counting on some somebody beating coverage to get open.
We have 1 player who can do that.
Which poses the issue, we can protect or we can run routes, but we can’t seem to do both. And therein lies the problem.
Seems to me we’ve seen a lot more 5 or 6 man protections lately. Kliff has tried to spread defenses out to gain an advantage running the ball. The problem with this (IMO) is 3-fold. First, (as you mentioned) defenders are playing close to the LOS, resulting in stacked boxes, blitzes, and taking away our quick game (and Daniels running). Second, teams are playing single high (to bracket Terry), so they have an additional defender in the box or close to the LOS. Third, teams are getting quick pressure on Daniels, so he doesn’t have time to wait on longer developing routes or to make 4-5 reads. So he can throw it short into tight coverage, or air it out deep to a doubled Terry or to Brown, who isn’t great at beating his man deep.
Long story short, I’d frequently max protect (from different looks, with 1 or 2 guys then leaking out on routes), giving Daniels time to go through reads, and putting pressure on dbs to cover longer and a vs wider variety of routes. As a minor bonus, the longer a play goes on, the better chance Daniels has to run into more space. And of course chip blockers helping seal the edge helps Daniels get out of the pocket more often - resulting in more chances to run, and more time for dbs to cover.
If we show a willingness to do this often, including significantly reducing our rushing attempts, perhaps we see defenses begin to back off the LOS, thus opening up the ground game, screens and quick hitters. Or maybe it all backfires. Who knows.
BTW, you definitely hit on a fundamental personnel problem we have - we’re lacking pass catchers that can win.