It was suggested on Twitter yesterday that Washington fans are divided on the QB position because the team has failed to acquire one the “right way” since we took Griffin second overall in the 2012 draft.
Now, I’m not sure what the “right way” is or, if we are being honest, what that even means, but I do know that we didn’t do it when we acquired Griffin. The Shanahans have all but said publicly that they didn’t want Griffin but were basically forced to make the trade that brought us RGIII. Thank you, Daniel Snyder.
Whatever else it was, it was definitely NOT the right way.
But the Tweet did get me thinking about what might have been the right way and what the differences might have looked like today.
In March of 2012, the then Redskins traded the team’s first and second-round picks in that draft (6 and 39, respectively), and first-rounders in 2013 and 2014 (22nd and 2nd, respectively) to the Rams for the right to take Griffin second overall. Then the team turned right around and drafted Cousins in the 4th round of the same draft.
Hindsight proves that both moves were outright theft, just with different victims.
So, let’s go get Mr. Peabody & Sherman, crank up the old WABAC Machine to take a trip back 10 years, and see what might of have been, shall we?
Instead of Griffin at #2, we stay at #6 and take DT Fletcher Cox. We also get to keep that 2nd round pick, #39 overall, and with that pick, we take LB Bobby Wagner. Even though we could jump on Russell Wilson in the 3rd, we will leave the rest of this draft alone and take Cousins in the 4th round because we assume he was Shanahan’s choice all along.
In 2013, at #22 overall, Team Shanahan goes with DeAndre Hopkins to give their now 2nd year QB Cousins a big target on the outside to throw the ball to. This, plus the addition of Jordan Reed in the 3rd round, start to round this offense into something truly dangerous.
In 2014, Washington earned the #2 pick overall. Honestly, 2014 was a lousy year to be picking #2 overall. Looking at the list of guys in the top 10, hindsight says you trade back, pick up a few extra picks, and take someone like Aaron Donald or Zach Martin. However, for the purposes of this exercise, we will assume Washington stays at #2 and takes Kahlil Mack.
Now, I know hindsight is 20/20 and I’m working with the advantage here. No question that I am cherry-picking guys with long careers who have been difference-makers to their teams for nearly a decade. Would we have hit on all 4 picks? Probably not. However, none of what I have proposed is preposterous or would have taken a miracle to make happen. It would have given our defense real teeth and created an offense that by the 2015 season would have run roughshod over most of the league.
However, the biggest change in all this might have been in the coaching ranks, as following this plan Washington might have kept the Shanahans happy and ultimately lead to Kyle taking over for Mike.
How much of a difference would that have made?
Last edited: