Kirk Cousins Development Tracker

Football, like basketball, is best played from the inside-out. Quarterback, receivers, running backs.....none of those really matter to me at the moment. Sure, they're awfully exciting when they're special, but at the end of the day - to me - the one thing that will make or break a team is the INSIDE play. For the Redskins (and football), that means the lines.

I'm okay writing this season off as long as we see improvement (and a youth movement) on the lines. And, so long as our new GM brings in another solid crop next off season. Two, three years from now....if that's handled properly.....we could have a monster team on our hands - regardless of the "system" or head coach or quarterback.

Fingers crossed I live that long.
 
Agree in principle, LSF. I think the "inside out" thing is an NFL truism going back to the roots of the game. If my big men can kick your big men's asses, I generally win. There's an exception though that needs to be made in today's game.

With the rules favoring the passing game now, where a DB can scarcely frown at a receiver past the line of scrimmage, a big-time QB can carve up just about any defense regardless of its big men. No big man can get to a Rodgers, Brady, or Manning when they're on their game. Not enough to beat them more often than not anyway. The ball is just out too fast, and it gets there too quickly and accurately for a DB wearing handcuffs and chewing breathmints (so as not to offend the WR and be called personally foul) to do much about it.

The Franchise QB, for the lucky few teams that find them, changes everything. Even NFL truisms.

That said ... we don't have one. Not Kirk. Not Bob. Not Colt. So we better damn well walk the straight and narrow axiomatic trail and build the hell outta the lines, as you say, in hopes we can catch lighting in a bottle with a serviceable QB once in a while until the gods favor us with a great one.

Within our lifetimes would be nice, indeed.
 
Okay, okay.....yes, there are other mitigating factors in how the game of football is played, Mark. :playful:

I will also add to my previous statement that not only am I looking forward to McG building this team over the next couple off seasons as it pertains to the line, but also with regards to all other positions - secondary, linebackers, special teams, offensive skill positions. If we can draft skillfully for the first time in many years and regimes, and then allow things - with the right guidance, teaching and direction - to percolate....I think we might have something here.
 
its really simple, the best coaches use the talent they have and maximise it, we havent seen that in decades

In 2007 Joe Gibbs took this team to the playoffs with Todd Collins at the helm...that is only 8 years ago, not decades.

In 2012 Mike Shanahan took Robert Griffin and devised a scheme and made him the most electrifying rookie QB, perhaps in history.
 
Agree in principle, LSF. I think the "inside out" thing is an NFL truism going back to the roots of the game. If my big men can kick your big men's asses, I generally win. There's an exception though that needs to be made in today's game.

With the rules favoring the passing game now, where a DB can scarcely frown at a receiver past the line of scrimmage, a big-time QB can carve up just about any defense regardless of its big men. No big man can get to a Rodgers, Brady, or Manning when they're on their game. Not enough to beat them more often than not anyway. The ball is just out too fast, and it gets there too quickly and accurately for a DB wearing handcuffs and chewing breathmints (so as not to offend the WR and be called personally foul) to do much about it.

The Franchise QB, for the lucky few teams that find them, changes everything. Even NFL truisms.

That said ... we don't have one. Not Kirk. Not Bob. Not Colt. So we better damn well walk the straight and narrow axiomatic trail and build the hell outta the lines, as you say, in hopes we can catch lighting in a bottle with a serviceable QB once in a while until the gods favor us with a great one.

Within our lifetimes would be nice, indeed.

but a franchise qb almost never develops without at least a competant oline, how many potential franchise qbs get gunshy or get happy feet because they were beat up too much early in their careers? the point stands, you build through your lines, and once you have at least a competant Oline in place THEN you can go after a franchise qb
 
In 2007 Joe Gibbs took this team to the playoffs with Todd Collins at the helm...that is only 8 years ago, not decades.

In 2012 Mike Shanahan took Robert Griffin and devised a scheme and made him the most electrifying rookie QB, perhaps in history.

I thought gibbs 2 was brunell at qb, but point taken, so one team in decades, because 2012, we schemed pretty well on offence and elementary school level on defence.
 
Ryman, you act like the 2007 and 2012 teams were chock full of all-pros.

Talent and the lack there of, have been this club's main issue for the better part of 20 years.
And I don't care how much scheming one does, if you don't have the horses, you ain't going to go too far.
 
Exactly. No sense in trying to tell him differently when he's stuck believing otherwise
 
OK, I think I've seen enough of Kirk Cousins... Colt is a journeyman at best. Let's put Robert back in there until he either becomes great or we get the next Robert.
 
OK, I think I've seen enough of Kirk Cousins... Colt is a journeyman at best. Let's put Robert back in there until he either becomes great or we get the next Robert.
Your opinion is noted.

But no. :)
 
OK, its Thursday. Its game time in 3 days.

Time to rally around our ENTIRE team and get some motivation going.

Cousins to Reed is a lethal combo.
Cousins getting the ball out of his hand quickly is a great thing. He makes snap decisions and avoids drive killing sacks.

HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!!
 
OK, its Thursday. Its game time in 3 days.

Time to rally around our ENTIRE team and get some motivation going.

Cousins to Reed is a lethal combo.
Cousins getting the ball out of his hand quickly is a great thing. He makes snap decisions and avoids drive killing sacks.

HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!!

We're HOPING its game time in 3 days lol... this stupid hurricane might be trying to change that.
 
**** a hurricane....I've been saying that since Maryland was playing Miami in the 80s ;)
 
**** a hurricane....I've been saying that since Maryland was playing Miami in the 80s ;)

I hope it's playable... a nasty, wet field plays to our massive advantage.
 
I hope it's playable... a nasty, wet field plays to our massive advantage.

I'm not so sure about that. 2 running backs, maybe 3. One of them can get footing. Plus, the Iggles have the same shit field to play on it can help us as well.

HTTR!!
 
I'm not so sure about that. 2 running backs, maybe 3. One of them can get footing. Plus, the Iggles have the same shit field to play on it can help us as well.

HTTR!!

Im saying I WANT a sloppy field. Their offense is based on tempo and speed... a sloppy field can slow that down much better then our defense can.
 
Cousins to McCoy to Griffin III, it?s always something with Redskins QBs - The Star Democrat - Easton, Maryland: Pros

“He’s done some good things,” Gruden said. “I don’t know if we’re all expecting him to be 25 for 30 and 420 yards and five touchdowns every week. We’re hoping for gradual improvement. ... He’s shown enough in the first three games so far that he is improving.”

And yet, Redskins Pro Bowl left tackle Trent Williams said Wednesday, “He’s ahead of the curve. ... He’s been getting the ball out. He’s been seeing the right people. Throwing it to the right people. To me, he’s doing a very, very good job, as of right now. ... You couldn’t ask him to do any better.”

Ahead of the curve? Gradual improvement? Shown enough?

.........let's hope that starts to become the case.
 
I think Trent's answer can be decoded like this: "Please, please, please don't go back to RG. I never know where he'll be. Blocking for him is a guessing game." :)
 
Seems relevant enough ...

Redskins: A fine line to walk for Jay Gruden, Kirk Cousins

There’s a fine line between playing loose and playing timid, with interceptions being the line of division. Such is the case with Washington Redskins quarterback Kirk Cousins.

The Redskins can ill-afford turnovers from the position, but head coach Jay Gruden said that the team can’t afford for the quarterback to play scared either.

“We’re trying to fix them,” said Gruden of the interceptions. “You know, we do drills out here ball-security-wise for the running backs, receivers and quarterbacks, all-the time. And as far as decisions for the quarterbacks, they’re going to throw some interceptions throughout the course of the season, there’s no doubt.

“You see great quarterbacks doing it every week also. It’s just a matter of not forcing balls and making good decisions with them. If a defensive back makes a good break and picks one off, that’s fine. You know, that’s going to happen, but if we throw them across our body to a blind spot and it gets tipped up and intercepted, that’s on us as coaches and on the player.

“So we just try to teach good-sound decision making, but you also don’t want to have the quarterback play scared either. He’s got to let balls fly. Kirk [Cousins] has done a nice job. He’s only been sacked a few times this year. He’s thrown with good anticipation and precision. We don’t want to take away from that, but when plays break down, not making a play worse is very, very important. Those decisions will have to be on him.”
Asked if the missed sure touchdown pass to Jordan Reed was an example of a “timid” throw, Gruden said he wouldn’t characterize it as that.

“I wouldn’t say 'timid.’ I just think he was so open that he just tried to guide the ball instead of throwing it. He has plenty arm to throw it over there. He just tried to aim it – you know what I mean? – and not overthrow him. Sometimes when a quarterback sees a receiver that open, they try to guide it instead of throwing it in there. I think he just guided it and didn’t get enough out there. Jordan’s deceiving. Once he gets going, he’s a lot faster than he looks, so he was gauging his speed and just underthrew it.”

Cousins concurred with his coach’s assessment.

"Yeah, I thought the first one Jordan beat him so much that a part of me said, 'Don't overthrow him. Just give him a chance,’ you know? When you win that much at the line of scrimmage, you start to try to aim it and try to give him a chance to just make sure it's not overthrown,” said Cousins. “As a result, sure enough, when you start aiming it and not throwing it, it gets underthrown and the guy was able to recover. So, that one was one we felt we left on the table and then other one to Jordan was a tough deal where the protection, the safety blitz got on me quickly and I wasn't able to set my feet and let it go.

“And that was another one where you felt like Jordan had beat his guy and if the ball had been able to be thrown further out potentially could've been a touchdown as well. And that's where you walk away and say, 'You know, we have the talent to make the plays. The plays are there to be made. We’ve just got to make them.' We’ve got to be play through these things and work through them and hopefully, like I said, not repeat the same things over and over."

Gruden caught flack from fans and the media alike for his comments that quarterbacks, even the great ones throw interceptions.

Looking at the numbers through three games, Cousins has plenty of company in the interceptions category, so maybe Gruden has a point.

Andrew Luck (7), Matthew Stafford (5), Colin Kaepernick (4), Phillip Rivers (4), Joe Flacco (4), Sam Bradford (4), Peyton Manning (3), Alex Smith (3), and Ryan Tannehill (3) are among the names either having more interceptions thrown or within one of Cousins (4).
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top