- Joined
- Aug 1, 2009
- Messages
- 24,950
- Reaction score
- 530
- Points
- 1,143
- Alma Mater
But we all DO all have a complete idea of how RG3 performed.
so now your point has evolved to "well, he might not eventually be a HOF QB so we made a mistake taking him"?
You look more and more ridiculous with every successive post on this.
I'm out of this dumb conversation before my blood pressure gets higher.
Find me any Football pro who today would agree with you that we should have taken Tannyhill instead of Rg3 and I'll give you your special accolades that you so obviously need to feel good about yourself.
My point hasn't "evolved Ss. It is the same as it was last year. RG3 was a risky investment that has not paid off. You seem to think a Division Championship was as important as damaging the futuire of the team. I think we should have rebuilt in another way. And if you'd stop reading what you want to read and actually use some reading comprehension skills, you'd see that I mentioned Russell Wilson too since Shanahan swooned over him last year at the Senior Bowl.
You guys can wear your Burgundy and Gold colored glasses all you want, but I won't.