How'd Washington do? NFL Draft Grades...

Boone

The Commissioner
Staff member
Runner-up #1
Joined
Apr 11, 2009
Messages
55,807
Reaction score
17,399
Points
2,743
Location
Greensboro, NC
Military Branch
Marine Corps
Alma Mater
Virginia
Here's what the interwebz have to say about Adam Peters first draft in DC...

PFF

WASHINGTON COMMANDERS: A​

Daniels — Daniels is QB3 behind Drake Maye on both the PFF big board and the consensus big board, but the new regime in Washington takes him at No. 2 overall. Daniels does make sense as a theoretical fit in a Kliff Kingsbury spread-to-run offense that will allow Daniels to add on in the run game and get the ball out to players in space.

Newton — This wasn’t a need for Washington, as two of their best players — Jonathan Allen and Daron Payne — play along the interior defensive line. However, this is a tremendous value selection at the top of the second round. Newton is the 11th-ranked player overall on the PFF big board and was extremely productive over his college career. Just three Power Five interior defensive linemen have recorded 100 or more pressures over a two-year stretch since PFF began charting college in 2014: Newton, his new teammate Jonathan Allen and DeForest Buckner.

Sainristil — The Commanders continue to draft good football players. Sainristil brings a fierce mentality to the team and provides positional versatility. He secured a career-best six interceptions in 2023, second among cornerbacks, and his 90.3 PFF grade since 2022 ranked fourth among Big Ten cornerbacks. Sainristil has great reaction speed and is fearless in run defense.

Sinnott — After previously getting great value in this draft, according to the PFF big board, the Commanders pick the 105th-ranked player in Round 2. Sinnott is an athletic tight end for Jayden Daniels to develop with for the next decade. He doesn’t do any one thing at an elite level but can do everything well. Sinnott’s 14 missed tackles forced in 2023 ranked third among tight ends, and he made 31 explosive plays over the past two seasons.

Coleman — The Commanders finally land an offensive lineman at the top of the third round, selecting Coleman out of TCU. The 6-foot-6, 320-pounder struggled in 2023 but was far better in 2022 when he earned a 79.6 PFF grade. He could wind up on the inside in the NFL, but he has the experience on the outside, so he could still get a shot there first.

McCaffrey — McCaffrey has NFL bloodlines and is a natural athlete who knows the nuances of route running. He lacks an explosive element to his game but has strong hands, especially in contested catch situations, where his 32 receptions since 2022 are the most in college football. A former quarterback, McCaffrey has a good feel for finding open zones. While the Commanders already have weapons in the receiver room, McCaffrey provides a different style for the group.

Magee — A high-level competitor with a nonstop motor, Magee offers some solid run-and-chase ability, physicality in the box and upside as a blitzer. He posted a career-best 87.2 PFF grade in 2023 and an eye-catching 90.7 pass-rush grade that ranked fourth among all linebackers. At worst, Magee will be an impact core special teamer, but he has the competitive toughness and athletic traits to become a starter.

Hampton — Hampton is a supersized safety at 6-foot-3 and 215 pounds, and he comes with good athleticism. He’s an interesting addition to a Dan Quinn defense that prioritizes those kinds of hybrid athletes in the middle of the field. Hampton was at his best in coverage around the line of scrimmage, as he earned an 81st-percentile coverage grade in the box last season for the Huskies.

Jean-Baptiste — Jean-Baptiste recorded 43 total pressures a season ago, including six sacks and 11 quarterback hits. He also produced 21 run stops without missing a tackle.

***********************************************************************************

CBS Sports

Washington Commanders

ROUNDPICKPLAYERGRADE
12Jayden Daniels, QB, LSUA
236Johnny Newton, DL, IllinoisA+
250Mike Sainristil, CB, MichiganB+
253Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas StateA+
367Brandon Coleman, OT, TCUA
3100Luke McCaffrey, WR, RiceB+
5139Jordan Magee, LB, TempleA-
5161Dominique Hampton, S, WashingtonB-
7222Javontae Jean-Baptiste, DL, Notre DameA-
GM Adam Peters began his tenure in Washington with a bang. Daniels, Newton, Sainristil, Sinnott, Coleman, McCaffrey. My word. Those are all plus athletes with clean film who excel in their specific roles. Magee is a bendy off-ball linebacker with serious juice, and Hampton, while older, has as much athletic prowess as anyone in the class.

Grade: A
***************************************************************************

USA Today

6. Washington Commanders (A-)​

No. 2 overall pick Jayden Daniels (LSU) could be their galvanizing, long-sought franchise quarterback after the previous regime spent years kicking that can down the road. Second-round DT Johnny Newton (Illinois) and DB Mike Sainristil (Michigan) could be foundational players for the incoming staff … though Newton’s arrival seems to signal Jonathan Allen or Daron Payne could be a short-timer. And it’s worth wondering if the former decision-makers did the current ones a disservice by dealing Sweat as pass rush is still an issue here. Third-round WR Luke McCaffrey certainly has the bloodlines – and maybe the talent to be an impact target for Daniels from the slot.

***********************************************************************************

Sports Illustrated

Grade: A+

  • Round 1: No. 2: Jayden Daniels, QB, LSU
  • Round 2: No. 36: Jer’Zhan “Johnny” Newton, DT, Illinois
  • Round 2: No. 50: Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan
  • Round 2: No. 53: Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas St.
  • Round 3: No. 67: Brandon Coleman, OL, TCU
  • Round 3: No. 100: Luke McCaffrey, WR, Rice
  • Round 5: No. 139: Jordan Magee, LB, Temple
  • Round 5: No. 161: Dominique Hampton, S, Washington
  • Round 7: No. 222: Javontae Jean-Baptiste, Edge, Notre Dame
Analysis: This was a straight-up masterpiece. The Commanders got the best quarterback in the draft (as I see it, at least) and then hammered the top 100, eschewing the relatively worthless picks that will be coming in Rounds 4–7. This is one of the few drafts that I thought elevated a team from its pre-draft status into something promising. Could Washington be this year’s Texans? I’m not ruling it out and you shouldn’t, either.

************************************************************************************

The Ringer

draftrank.png


**************************************************************************************************************

NFL.com

Day 1 grade: A

Day 2 grade: A

Day 3 grade: A-


Analysis: The Commanders entered a new era with an excellent draft. Daniels could be an elite dual-threat playmaker if he becomes more efficient from the pocket. Newton is a force in the front four. Sainristil is a pain for opposing receivers to handle. Sinnott is an underappreciated receiving/blocking weapon. Coleman is a powerful guard/tackle. And McCaffrey is a reliable WR2 or WR3 option.

Washington did not have a fourth-round pick after moving up to the third in the Sam Howell trade with Seattle. It found a future starting linebacker in Magee, whose explosiveness was underappreciated while he was playing at Temple. Hampton possesses a nice combination of size and quickness, and it won't be surprising if he plays as a rookie.

**********************************************************************************************************

Bleacher Report

LSU quarterback Jayden Daniels was the third-ranked signal-caller on the B/R Scouting Department's final big board and is far from a perfect prospect. However, he will provide excitement to the Washington Commanders offense and doesn't carry a significant amount of risk.
"Daniels' average arm talent and inconsistent accuracy may limit his ceiling, but it's hard to imagine him totally flaming out," Klassen wrote.
Adding Daniels to an offense that features Terry McLaurin, Jahan Dotson, Austin Ekeler, Zach Ertz and rookie third-round pick Luke McCaffrey should bring some serious excitement to Washington in 2024.

Washington got a tremendous value by grabbing Illinois defensive lineman Jer'Zhan Newton at the top of Round 2. Newton is a legitimate playmaker who will immediately upgrade a defense that ranked 32nd overall last season. He was the 20th-ranked prospect on the B/R board.

Washington also added Michigan cornerback Mike Sainristil in Round 2. While Sainristil may not have the length (5'9", 182 lbs) to consistently play on the perimeter, he'll aid a defense that allowed more passing yards than any other team last season.

Tight end Ben Sinnott was much more of a reach later in Round 2. However, TCU's Brandon Coleman was the top tackle remaining on the board at the top of Round 3 and will provide depth—or possibly start—for a line that surrendered 65 sacks in 2023.

General manager Adam Peters found a few interesting defensive prospects on Day 3, including linebacker Jordan Magee and Javontae Jean-Baptiste. That should make new head coach Dan Quinn happy. However, it would have been wise to throw a few more darts at an offensive line that was one of the worst in the league last season—especially in a draft that featured a ton of line depth.

Everything will come down to Daniels for Washington. If he proves worthy of the No. 2 pick, no one will remember the rest of this class. If he struggles, it'll be fair to wonder if Washington could have done more to support him.

Grade: B+
 
This is awesome. I don’t know what to feel right now. I liked the draft, but I’ve liked some in the past and they didn’t work out. I can’t remember this franchise getting this kind of consensus love for their draft. I’m sure 1 or 2 may have in the past, but nothing like this.
 
I can't ever recall the kind of universal props we are getting. I recognize that part of it is a sort of celebration of a new era beginning, and also stems from Adam Peters being such a likable and well-respected new GM. But if draft evaluators wanted to poke holes in some of our choices or focus on concerns, there certainly were some opportunities to do so - and yet that doesn't seem to be happening even on the slightest level.

So there are really two possibilities... one, that Peters and Company are getting huge benefit of the doubt, or two - they just knocked this draft completely out of the park. I am leaning towards the latter.
 
The lowest grade I have seen thus far is Walter Football, who gave us a B-.

I personally am happy with the draft. Our first five picks can all legitimately earn full-time starting roles in the NFL and be effective players in due time. Our Day 3 additions are all athletic freaks which gives them a chance to stick. On top of that, the additions of Magee and Hampton also strengthen the Special Teams group and give us some future leaders within that unit.

Obviously, the only thing to complain about is only adding one body along the OL. Honestly, we could have added three any nobody would have complained. For now, that makes me give this draft a B, as LT, RT, and LG on our roster are still questionable. If they got something up their sleeve and still have some adds in mind that solidify the OL going into September, my grade could change to a B+ / A range. Until then, it's a B.
 
Yeah - I'm with you 100% Paul. It's crazy - the BGO membership is being tougher on this draft than traditional NFL media assessors are... I'm not sure that has EVER happened.
 
I agree with Paul. The OT position is the only thing that caused me to drop from A to B.
 
We upgraded this roster immensely.

I gave us an A. Newton pick helps Payne and Allen stay fresher and puts stress on opposing olines. When is the right time to draft a premium DT? Not when you have none. Then you are force to pick one.

Sinnott helps the protection as well as our rookie qb.

I loved the Sainristil and McCaffrey picks. I’m intrigued by the others as I learn about them.


With that said, I’m not sure our starting game 1 left tackle is on the roster yet. So we pick a used one up on Amazon.
 
What a difference a year makes!

The one thing that not many people are talking about, is that Peters and co pulled off what on paper looks to be the best draft we’ve had in a while, while also…

A) maintaining all our 2025 picks
B) not spending all our cap.

Honestly, with growing pains this team is still realistically a mid range 7 or 8 win team, which means we get to do this all again a year from now with a full complement of draft picks and a ton of cash.

I love the self restraint. It would have been so easy to spend all our cap and trade away future picks to try and make quick fixes.

I really like the feeling that we’ve got competent professionals in charge for once!
 
I really wouldn't have minded another trade and part of me wanted to get a few 2025 picks, but that's nitpicking. I wonder if we have vague plans to trade players again. I guess that depends how the season plays out.

These are great first blush draft grades. I can't wait to see how they will look by the end of the year or by the end of year two. I wonder what the over/under would be on players that earn a second contract with the team?
 
Pretty stoked about it! For once, we have universal positive remarks form national analysts. The run on offense overall pushed Newton to the 2nd round. So, it's like we got 2 first rounders.

It looks like they really went for aggressive, team leaders. Lots of captains and guys they say who eat, breathe, sleep football.

And violent. Whitt Jr said that we are going to "put or bodies on people in a violent manner." Like even the 5th rounders, who I was not familiar with at all -- after seeing video and coverage on them -- Magee and Hampton play with violent intentions!
 
I
This is awesome. I don’t know what to feel right now. I liked the draft, but I’ve liked some in the past and they didn’t work out. I can’t remember this franchise getting this kind of consensus love for their draft. I’m sure 1 or 2 may have in the

This is awesome. I don’t know what to feel right now. I liked the draft, but I’ve liked some in the past and they didn’t work out. I can’t remember this franchise getting this kind of consensus love for their draft. I’m sure 1 or 2 may have in the past, but nothing like

The lowest grade I have seen thus far is Walter Football, who gave us a B-.

I personally am happy with the draft. Our first five picks can all legitimately earn full-time starting roles in the NFL and be effective players in due time. Our Day 3 additions are all athletic freaks which gives them a chance to stick. On top of that, the additions of Magee and Hampton also strengthen the Special Teams group and give us some future leaders within that unit.

Obviously, the only thing to complain about is only adding one body along the OL. Honestly, we could have added three any nobody would have complained. For now, that makes me give this draft a B, as LT, RT, and LG on our roster are still questionable. If they got something up their sleeve and still have some adds in mind that solidify the OL going into September, my grade could change to a B+ / A range. Until then, it's a B.
I’m not to hung up on lack of OL picks in the draft . They did sign 3 guys in the offseason 2 centers a guard and resigned Lucas . I’m not sure if it’s a good idea to bring in a rookie LT which we could use to protect Daniels blindside
 
Mark Maske seems way off. I don't know his background pre-Post, I wonder if he is another one of these guys that is a Baltimoron fan masquerading as a Commander commentator.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if some of our grades went something like this:

Rating of Washington drafted players produces a B/A grade.

Rating of Washington players minus the penalty for not getting the players I thought they should or addressing the areas they should produces a B- grade.

I feel a little like that myself. I can't fault any of the players chosen in rounds 1-3, but I really hoped we'd come out of this draft with a couple highly rated tackles and guards. So while I'm very excited about the players we did pick I still feel like "we're not done" I don't like our starting o line and I'm not excited by our o line depth. Now, everyone will rightly say that you can't fix everything in one off season or one draft and Peters did try to address the o line in the first wave of free agency, but as a fan I get to be greedy and unrealistic. I want more.
 
I bet though with all of those teams taking OTs very high in the draft at least a couple of them are going to release veteran tackles that can still play but are making a lot more money than their current performance warrants.

If Washington is smart we are there to pick up this low hanging fruit as a way to bridge the gap for 2024.
 
I really wouldn't have minded another trade and part of me wanted to get a few 2025 picks, but that's nitpicking. I wonder if we have vague plans to trade players again. I guess that depends how the season plays out.

These are great first blush draft grades. I can't wait to see how they will look by the end of the year or by the end of year two. I wonder what the over/under would be on players that earn a second contract with the team?
I’d say that 2024 is very much a prove it year for many of our incumbent players. If I were Peters and DQ this year would very much be about evaluating what we have. Last year was probably not a fair representation of what some of these players are.

I’m sure they did a bunch of evaluation this year, but the filter wasn’t clean when looking at the team. Rivera was a lame duck coach. Del Rio was phoning it in and the lost his phone. I think some players mentally checked out and others were either worn out (Allen and Payne) or just badly mismanaged/coached. Especially late after Chase and Sweat were gone. EB forgot we were supposed to run the ball and put too much pressure on a young QB and a deficient o line.

Honestly, the latter half of last year was a coaching disaster.

So…

Can Forbes be something worth his draft slot?
Can Davis produce?
Will Payne and Allen bounce back?
What’s our run game really like?
Can Dyami and Milne be something in an offense that’s more balanced?
Can Cole Turner be a contributor?

And this is just a few questions that need answers. By this time next year after the muddied waters of bad coaching have been drained away, the new coaches will likely have a much better view of our true talent level and be able to act appropriately in Free Agency and next years draft.
 
Just to build on that, Knightingale, one unexpected advantage is hiring Quinn is that he has broken down a lot of Washington tape over the past few years. So, he probably knows this roster about as well as an outsider can. He certainly has studied the offense and analyzed its weaknesses. He knows how to attack it and he knows where it is strong. His view of the players isn't strictly informed by 2023 either. He's been watching these players develop or fail to develop for years.
 
I gave the draft a solid B. If they roll out an average to better than average OL this season, I’ll up it to an A.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top