Actually, Neo, Bulldog is specifically talking about this front office:
First of all, comparing ANY war room today to Beathard's in the 80s is complete bunk. Nobody can stash players away for a few years and let them mature so that they can hit the ground running by the time they take the field. Charlie Brown did not see a snap his rookie year. Neither did Didier. Or Rypien. Or Terry Orr. Or Kurt Gouveia. Wilburn didn't start until his third season. Neither did McKenzie.
It is completely unfair to look at our 2011 rookies and suggest they are not those guys. We can't say they ARE those guys, but given that many of them have already started contributing to the team, to a degree not seen on this team in years, the potential is there.
Secondly, I've already addressed Garcon, but if you want to point to Colston he's clearly an exception rather than the rule. Most late round guys need a year or two to hit their stride, either because they need more time to develop or they just don't get the chance to start until their second or third year. What you look for from your late round rookies is potential, not superstardom. And I think we've seen that recently.
Bulldog's Twin said:Yes, we have middle and as usual a bevy of late round picks but the Redskins War Room has not imitated Beathard in recent years and found a Dexter in Round 5 or a Darryl Grant in Round 9.
We have picked up some depth players, but not the Garcons and Morgans (both sixth rounders) that we are now paying top dollar for in free agency.
First of all, comparing ANY war room today to Beathard's in the 80s is complete bunk. Nobody can stash players away for a few years and let them mature so that they can hit the ground running by the time they take the field. Charlie Brown did not see a snap his rookie year. Neither did Didier. Or Rypien. Or Terry Orr. Or Kurt Gouveia. Wilburn didn't start until his third season. Neither did McKenzie.
It is completely unfair to look at our 2011 rookies and suggest they are not those guys. We can't say they ARE those guys, but given that many of them have already started contributing to the team, to a degree not seen on this team in years, the potential is there.
Secondly, I've already addressed Garcon, but if you want to point to Colston he's clearly an exception rather than the rule. Most late round guys need a year or two to hit their stride, either because they need more time to develop or they just don't get the chance to start until their second or third year. What you look for from your late round rookies is potential, not superstardom. And I think we've seen that recently.


