I want to push against this criticism of fans for a couple of reasons.
Of course, we expect Chig to be better with Daniels. Isn't that why we all wanted a franchise quarterback? Isn't that the whole point of having a franchise QB? To elevate players? Second, people forget that before Ertz was signed in Washington, his reputation was in the gutter. He was considered washed up and a has been. Most analysts and fantasy guys mocked us for even signing him. So Ertz pre-Daniels and with-Daniels was a different player. Maybe Ertz was revived because he didn't get to play with Willis and Ward? Maybe at his stage and age, he was barely an average player who Daniels turned into a good player. If so, why wouldn't we think a player like Chig would see a bump too when playing with a good QB for the first time in his career?
With Daniels, Ertz was targeted around 20% of the time. Chig's target rate is about 14% of the time. Given the wide receiver room, it is very likely that Chig will see more targets and it's not unreasonable that his target rate climbs to near where Ertz was. That alone, you'd think, would lead to Chig having better statistical production than in season's past... unless, Chig was not targeted because he's terrible at getting open. Still, circling back to the original complaint. A franchise QB is supposed to throw receivers open. He's supposed to make JAGs look okay, okay guys look pretty good, and good players play at their best.
Ertz was healthy, especially in his first season here. In Arizona, he was always banged up. He's at least a borderline Hall of Famer. Logan Paulsen specifically talked about how the tight ends coach spent part of minicamp teaching Chig Ertz-style releases. As Logan mentioned even the older version of Ertz was still elite at creating separation with his releases and route running. That's a big reason he became Jayden's No. 2 target.
Look, I was on the Chig bandwagon before it was cool to be on the Chig bandwagon. Same with Jacory Croskey-Merritt. Same with Rachaad White. I'm exaggerating a little to make the point, but I get the "old is bad, new is good" mindset. That's how this fan base has operated for years, and I used to think the same way. So I get it.
I don't anymore. I've just seen too many offseasons where everyone gets excited about the shiny new toys, assumes everyone departed won't be missed, and then reality falls short of those expectations.
In this case, I think all three players can work out. I'm just more measured about the level of impact they'll have.
As for the rest of your point, to each their own. But I didn't want a franchise quarterback simply because he could elevate a mediocre roster. Sure, it's better to have a franchise quarterback with a mediocre supporting cast than a mediocre quarterback with one.
More importantly, though, Jayden isn't Brady, Mahomes, or Manning—not yet, anyway. So why not set him up to maximize his potential? Put him in the best possible situation.
One advantage Jayden does have over some other young quarterbacks is that he's already proven he can succeed with a below-average supporting cast. But imagine what he could do with an average supporting cast—or an above-average one.
Maybe that happens this year if they sign Diggs. If not, I think it eventually happens in 2027. Either way, I believe it's coming. The question is how long they're willing to make Jayden carry more of the load than he has to.
The Rook
