- Joined
- Nov 18, 2012
- Messages
- 10,995
- Reaction score
- 657
- Points
- 393
- Location
- Shevlin Minnesota
- Military Branch
Hell nah to Trent
Do we go for a vet QB in the offseason to try to really ride this defense? If there is a top 15 QB available do you spend the money or just hope to somehow hit in the draft?
I've been thinking along those lines as well. Stafford I think could be great for us potentially, Winston would scare me. If the Jets move on from Darnold I think he is going to have suites, just from being a top prospect and the Jets are horrible. I wouldn't mind giving him a shot, maybe he just needs a change of scenery.I think it depends on what Smith does. If he stays and doesn't retire, you can't really justify spending money on a veteran QB. You have Smith and most likely Allen (if he's healed). The third can be a guy you draft or Montez since they seem to like him. They can also draft a QB in the mid to late rounds they think they can develop.
If Smith does retire, I'd like to see them sign a vet QB. Perhaps Stafford if he is cut by the Lions. This won't be popular, but even someone like Winston. You could even take a shot on Darnold if you think you can get something out of him. Maybe you could sign Darnold on the cheap even if Smith doesn't retire.
No matter which option they go with, I'd still like to see them sign a young or youngish QB they think they can develop. I don't think Allen is that guy to be honest. Haskins clearly isn't. So it would be nice to have some hope that someone on the roster could be that guy.
Do we go for a vet QB in the offseason to try to really ride this defense? If there is a top 15 QB available do you spend the money or just hope to somehow hit in the draft?
I think it depends on what Smith does. If he stays and doesn't retire, you can't really justify spending money on a veteran QB. You have Smith and most likely Allen (if he's healed). The third can be a guy you draft or Montez since they seem to like him. They can also draft a QB in the mid to late rounds they think they can develop.
If Smith does retire, I'd like to see them sign a vet QB. Perhaps Stafford if he is cut by the Lions. This won't be popular, but even someone like Winston. You could even take a shot on Darnold if you think you can get something out of him. Maybe you could sign Darnold on the cheap even if Smith doesn't retire.
No matter which option they go with, I'd still like to see them sign a young or youngish QB they think they can develop. I don't think Allen is that guy to be honest. Haskins clearly isn't. So it would be nice to have some hope that someone on the roster could be that guy.
SilentThreat your knowledge on the cap and the breakdown is second to none. I know there are always challenges to bringing in a player and letting another go. I certainly do no know the salary cap situation or salaries for anyone, so I appreciate you breaking it down. I think the best case scenario is Smith doesn’t retire and he is the Vet. Whether they re-sign Allen, some other young cheap guy, somehow keep Haskins, or draft someone else, I think it could fit nicely in with what Alex brings and his salary.
If he retires, it will get complicated. Stafford is the most talented “likely” available QB. If he is cut by Detroit, I expect teams such as Chicago, New England, and possibly Indy (If Rivers retires) to be looking for a veteran QB. There may be others as well. For the sake of this discussion, we can assume Jacksonville drafts a QB. The Jets are a no brainer, but it is the Jets. Anyway, I do expect Stafford to get multiple offers if he’s available. The cap is likely to go down next year and his salary will be adjusted as a result. But I still think he will be able to pick and choose where he wants to go and how much he gets paid. Which likely will price the Team out of the market. I don’t know of any connection to this current leadership structure that might give the edge, but it’s nice to think about the possibility.
You haven't joined any rooms.