As for me and my family,we go to the church of Henry.
Preach it brother!
Preach it brother!
I wouldn't think so either, but that's what Pierra was saying.That would be the rule for a catch, but a run? I don't think so.
Nick
Yeah, I don't know about a fumble in a field of play. Honestly, I don't know if I've ever seen something like that before and it might not be apples to apples. In regular field of play, if he landed out of bounds and lost it, the play ends there. In the end zone, they say a fumble changes possession. I really good there is a statement by the NFL.They way they explained the rule, I'm not sure if that was the right interpretation or not. If the same thing happened in the field of play, would it be considered a fumble? Or would he be considered down by contact when he hit the ground? I've seen so many plays this year they would not overturn because it was not obvious, but this one they overturn?
I think the other part of it for me is that it was interpreted by Jeff Triplette, who is the worse ref in football. He was the ref during last years Giants game where the Redskins got a first down, then the next play, it was 4th down because he overturned it the play after. There are some refs, when they go under the hood, you wonder what they will call despite the video.
Excuses are for losers
If we were a good team with players who fight hard we would have overcome it.
And I think you meant mic drop..unless you really think you can pick me up off the ground.
I assume this post was directed at me?
If so, I agree. The Redskins are losers. No qualifiaction necessary.
My post wasn't about that.
Oh, and don't correct me when I'm on a roll.
Alright, with a mind numbing 7 sacks could someone tell me who most, if not all of then were on?
Can TyPo be cause for any of them?
When you assume you make an ass...of yourself.
You can consider yourself served..
You haven't joined any rooms.