I hear ya Om, but I still think you're discounting the entire picture when discussing the value of the trade and it was a clear picture at the time. You have to remember, and by you...I am talking plural, we had just been hit with a tremendous cap restraint that was going to already set us back years. How can you justify digging the hole deeper by spending what you call "fair market value" for "potential". Other teams could afford the cost, after the cap hit...we simply couldn't justify such a risky investment. And you have to realize it was a risk.
I would have less a problem with it if we hadn't just lost likely 5-6 mid-tier role players through the cap hit. That is likely in the neighborhood of 8-10 starters over a 3 year period after the trade that lead us here. A return on investment that I feel will never materialize.
I know this is all conjecture, but when making investments...I don't make risky ones. I am not a day trader. I am more willing to cut bait now and take out lumps with Kirk. You guys obviously aren't.