A Burgundy and Gold Obsession
Game 12 - Philly. No biggie. Just a season in the balance ...

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Disagree Disagree:  0
Post of the Year Post of the Year:  0
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    03-30-10
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    7,324
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Florida State

    Default ESPN: Skins a 2012 Contender?

    A pretty decent Q and A article with Shanahan. I found this particulary interesting, for those who believe we would offer the farm to move up for a QB:


    Finally, I asked if he thought his team was close enough to contending that he could afford to give away a big trove of draft picks for one player he really wanted.

    MS: No. In fact that's why, when we went from 10 to 16 [in last year's draft] and we were able to get that extra second-rounder from Jacksonville, we were able to parlay that where we got [Leonard] Hankerson, we got [Roy] Helu and we got [DeJon] Gomes. So by going from 10 to 16, not only did we get Jarvis Jenkins, but we were able to get those three players. And those are three starters for us.

    http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post...a-12-contender
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  2. #2

    BGO Survivor Champ 2015

    Join Date
    08-28-09
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    579
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    I recently ran across that article as well, and quite frankly, it was refreshing to hear.

    I'm as big a fan of RG3 as the next guy. With that being said, there still are major holes that need to be filled throughout the roster, and I don't know how comfortable I'd be with losing picks to acquire his rights, or any other draft pick's rights for that matter.

    Many of us said a year ago when Bruce and Mike continuously traded down to acquire more picks that we arguably need to do that in the draft for another season or two. That's how bare the cupboard was.

    Based on this season's performance, there is plenty of evidence suggesting that the cupboard is by no means full yet, and that it just might be of more benefit to take a smart approach, as opposed to trying to make a draft splash via a trade-up situation.

    Looking back, winning meaningless games at Seattle and New York might really have thrown a wrench in the plans to acquire a franchise quarterback.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  3. #3
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    09-28-10
    Location
    BGO's Official Resident "Tech Dummy"
    Posts
    9,242
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by McD5 View Post
    Kent Senter of Falls Church, Va., wanted to know why Shanahan has been preaching that the Redskins' rebuilding project must take time while a coach like Jim Harbaugh can come in and turn the San Francisco 49ers around in one year.

    Mike Shanahan: We had dealt a lot through free agency and not the draft. San Francisco did a great job through the draft, they did a great job with their organization.
    Quote Originally Posted by McD5 View Post
    In fact that's why, when we went from 10 to 16 [in last year's draft] and we were able to get that extra second-rounder from Jacksonville, we were able to parlay that where we got [Leonard] Hankerson, we got [Roy] Helu and we got [DeJon] Gomes. So by going from 10 to 16, not only did we get Jarvis Jenkins, but we were able to get those three players. And those are three starters for us.
    Mike - you totally contradicted yourself there.
    On one hand, you re primarily building through free agency, and on the other hand you did it through the draft. Can't be both. What a senseless interview.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  4. #4

    NFL Pickem Champion 2015

    Join Date
    08-04-09
    Location
    Sparta,NC
    Posts
    2,630
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)

    Default

    I think Mike's talking about the franchise's past..dealing mostly through free agency and less attention to the draft, which is true and which is why we've sucked for so long.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  5. #5
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-19-09
    Location
    Bethesda Md
    Posts
    6,757
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)

    Default

    Which is why looking at Tannehill and perhaps dropping down from #6 would be a smart move.

    Get extra picks and the qb for the future.
    Posted via BGO Mobile Device
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  6. #6
    2016 BGO Survivor Champ

    Join Date
    08-01-09
    Location
    My location
    Posts
    11,499
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Florida State

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog's Twin View Post
    Which is why looking at Tannehill and perhaps dropping down from #6 would be a smart move.

    Get extra picks and the qb for the future.
    Posted via BGO Mobile Device
    Yes! This is exactly how I feel.
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    The more things change...the more they stay the same. It's like deja vu all over again.

  7. #7
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-24-09
    Posts
    295
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    6
    College at Brockport

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fear The Spear View Post
    Mike - you totally contradicted yourself there.
    On one hand, you re primarily building through free agency, and on the other hand you did it through the draft. Can't be both. What a senseless interview.
    Shanahan meant the 'Skins have been built primarily through free agency in the past, and complimented San Francisco's draft first mentality.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  8. #8

    Join Date
    07-22-09
    Posts
    7,590
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog's Twin View Post
    Which is why looking at Tannehill and perhaps dropping down from #6 would be a smart move.

    Get extra picks and the qb for the future.
    Posted via BGO Mobile Device

    well..he and his son have done a wonderful job picking QB folks to develop so far!!!!!! why not gamble on an unknown with no real resume? can't be any worse than Butterball!
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  9. #9

    Join Date
    07-22-09
    Posts
    7,590
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KDawg View Post
    Shanahan meant the 'Skins have been built primarily through free agency in the past, and complimented San Francisco's draft first mentality.

    he must have forgotten about Nate Clements!... all $80 million of ole Nate!
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  10. #10
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    11-17-10
    Location
    I live in the warmest city in the coldest province
    Posts
    2,684
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    UTEP

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog's Twin View Post
    Which is why looking at Tannehill and perhaps dropping down from #6 would be a smart move.

    Get extra picks and the qb for the future.
    Posted via BGO Mobile Device
    Exactly and draft an Oline and sign Matt Flynn.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  11. #11
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-24-09
    Posts
    295
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    6
    College at Brockport

    Default

    I would advocate trading down if RG3 isn't ont he board. I think RG3 is a guy you can't pass on if you need a quarterback, and we do. If he's not there, I agree with this approach.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 2012 Presidential Election
    By Elephant in forum The 5 O'Clock Club
    Replies: 153
    Last Post: 04-19-11, 04:18 PM
  2. ESPN 980 Mortenson: Shanahan To Skins Almost Done
    By Bulldog in forum Sons of Washington
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-25-09, 08:17 PM
  3. ESPN: Looks Like Kelly Will be Skins' No. 2 WR
    By Lanky Livingston in forum Sons of Washington
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-04-09, 12:19 PM

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •