2026 53-Man Roster Thread

Fan’s trust wavers by the week (sometimes by the day or hour) depending on results or other factors. I certainly don’t want any organizational leader that is swayed by the fan’s opinions du jour or that is driven by earning their trust.
Hour by Hour?

If an UDFA RB fumbles on his first carry in the 4th quarter of the first preseason game, he sucks, his family sucks, his dog is ugly, the scout who evaluated him sucks, the GM sucks, and everybody should be fired and Harris should sell the team.

On his second drive, if he scores a TD, then all of those people were great in finding a diamond in the rough and is dog isn't ugly.

It's drive to drive, play to play.

Edit to add: this is clearly a joke and said tongue in cheek.
 
Last edited:
Friend, you are mis-remembering.

It was worse than that. SO MUCH WORSE. Let's walk through it together:

So first, Josh Johnson made the 53 as a 39 year old beating out Hartman for the 3rd string job. Ok, fine, but not a great look.
Then Daniels got hurt, Mariota was the starter, Johnson the backup.
Then Daniels was shut down.
Then Mariota got hurt.
Josh Johnson was named the starter. But they didn't have a backup.
Instead of elevating Hartman from the PS to be the backup to Johnson, they signed Driskell and made him the backup the same week they signed him.

They wouldn't even give Hartman a jersey as a backup in games which it would be better they lost than won. (It's POSSIBLE he was given a jersey as the inactive 3rd string backup or something. Maybe. I can't remember that but it doesn't matter.)

If that's not the indictment of the century, I'm not sure what is. Forget start. They wouldn't even let him back up Johnson and signed a guy from off the street to be the backup.

So your memory was kinder to Hartman than history shows :)

Ooouuuccch, I forgot about the Driskell bit.

Hartman must be really valuable in the QB room.
 
My working hypothesis for the past year+ is that they're developing him to be a coach and both sides are on the same page about it.

But…they could just do that without using a PS spot, that would be an idiotic use of resources. PS players “only” make like $180k for the season, if they spend the entire 17 weeks. Can’t imagine that’s significantly less than an entry-level offensive quality control coach, or they could pay him whatever they wanted as a coaching intern or assistant to the assistant QB coach. This feels like cope, they’re just mishandling resources.
 
But…they could just do that without using a PS spot, that would be an idiotic use of resources. PS players “only” make like $180k for the season, if they spend the entire 17 weeks. Can’t imagine that’s significantly less than an entry-level offensive quality control coach, or they could pay him whatever they wanted as a coaching intern or assistant to the assistant QB coach. This feels like cope, they’re just mishandling resources.

Being a player and being a coach are fundamentally different experiences, and it would ostensibly help any coach to have played for a significant period of time - even if just on the PS. If you think it's a poor use of a PS spot, hey fair enough. I don't know enough about it. But I dont think roster spot #70 is likely to end up a contributor, anyway. So if he can run the PS fine and you cultivate a young coaching candidate in-house, feels fine to me. Not going to get worked up about it when there are much higher priority issues like OL, CB, etc.
 
But…they could just do that without using a PS spot, that would be an idiotic use of resources. PS players “only” make like $180k for the season, if they spend the entire 17 weeks. Can’t imagine that’s significantly less than an entry-level offensive quality control coach, or they could pay him whatever they wanted as a coaching intern or assistant to the assistant QB coach. This feels like cope, they’re just mishandling resources.
I have no idea why he’s on the practice squad.
 
I have no idea why he’s on the practice squad.

just a thought...

Because he's been in the offense for 3 years and having another guy who knows the language / scheme / playcalling and can communicate it in practice and film room, is more valuable as your 4th QB than someone walking the street?
 
Hour by Hour?

If an UDFA RB fumbles on his first carry in the 4th quarter of the first preseason game, he sucks, his family sucks, his dog is ugly, the scout who evaluated him sucks, the GM sucks, and everybody should be fired and Harris should sell the team.

On his second drive, if he scores a TD, then all of those people were great in finding a diamond in the rough and is dog isn't ugly.

It's drive to drive, play to play.

Edit to add: this is clearly a joke and said tongue in cheek.

I was being kind. 😉
 
just a thought...

Because he's been in the offense for 3 years and having another guy who knows the language / scheme / playcalling and can communicate it in practice and film room, is more valuable as your 4th QB than someone walking the street?
But he wasn't more valuable as the 4th QB than someone walking the street last year. Unless Blough as an OC can finally tap into his abilities and elevate him to the 4th best now.
 
But he wasn't more valuable as the 4th QB than someone walking the street last year. Unless Blough as an OC can finally tap into his abilities and elevate him to the 4th best now.


I'm looking at practice, not game day.. they made it obvious that the street walkers on Sunday were more valuable, but that kind of is the bigger point right? He is who he is, and Mon - Fri you want less performance, more scheme
 
just a thought...

Because he's been in the offense for 3 years and having another guy who knows the language / scheme / playcalling and can communicate it in practice and film room, is more valuable as your 4th QB than someone walking the street?

This is year 1 of a much different offense. They could bring John Wolford off the street and he’d be more valuable than Hartman
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top