The 2026 Free Agency Thread

That’s the opposite of a problem. His contract was not large at all for a FA TE, random blocking TE’s nobody has ever heard of make $7-9M per in FA, it’s a premium position that frequently sees role players get overpaid. 3/27 was actually really reasonable for him and shows the rest of the league doesn’t secretly think he’s a top-10 TE in waiting.

If Sinnott breaks out (and if it’s at Chig’s expense, which doesn’t have to be the case), it won’t be a problem but at this point a borderline miracle.

Yep, and this is exactly what we should want the roster to look like. I think some of us are still carrying around the Snyder-era mindset because for so long Washington's rosters were paper thin. For example look at the Bears roster. Their #2 TE actually has more pedigree than Chig. Again their #2 not their #1. Their #1 is on the verge of being a superstar. And guess what? They draft in the third round, maybe my favorite TE in the class in Rousch. So they go for three.

People often think of the Cerrato years when they think of Snyder, but that was ancient history. The much longer stretch was the Bruce Allen/Ron Rivera era—a front office that was relatively cheap, drafted at a mediocre level at best, and constantly tried to win with bargain-bin solutions. The formula was always the same: sign inexpensive free agents and hope they played better here than anywhere else, count on young players to make leaps they never made, and rarely acquire elite talent through either free agency or the draft. Some exceptions but that was the gist.

Think about the revolving door of JAGs they rolled out at defensive tackle for years per the Jonathan Allen draft. They hit on the Garçon and DeSean Jackson additions, but then went right back to bargain free-agent receivers, draft busts, and patchwork offensive lines. It was almost always about trying to get by instead of building real depth.

That's why the receiver situation frustrates some of us. It feels familiar. It looks a lot more like the later Snyder years—especially the Rivera era—than it does a roster that's trying to maximize a franchise quarterback on a rookie contract.

If a young player breaks out, great—but he still has to earn the job. That's what strong organizations look like. They create talent gluts instead of hoping replacement-level players exceed expectations. That's the standard I'd like to see at wide receiver among other spots, too. But they certainly approached LB and Edge that was so progress.
 
We have a tendency as a fanbase to overhype guys. There are maybe 3 players on this roster deserving of major hype - Daniels, McLaurin, and Tunsil. Beyond that, I think it is 'wait and see'.
I think it's both. We definitely overhype guys, but we also kill guys. Solid guys are talked about like bums all the time. Good players are talked about as mid or JAGs.

I think my favorite old school examples are Rock Cartwright and James Thrash. Rock was sometimes talked about as a monster and a great player. Thrash was viewed as the worst player in the league. Truth was, Thrash was a blue collar guy who was okay. They just asked him to do to much, but really the thrashing Thrash took from the fan base was over the top. They guy gave all he could and was all effort. He was okay and not a waste of a roster spot. Likewise, Rock was overhyped because he was literally the little guy we root for.
 
That’s the opposite of a problem. His contract was not large at all for a FA TE, random blocking TE’s nobody has ever heard of make $7-9M per in FA, it’s a premium position that frequently sees role players get overpaid. 3/27 was actually really reasonable for him and shows the rest of the league doesn’t secretly think he’s a top-10 TE in waiting.

If Sinnott breaks out (and if it’s at Chig’s expense, which doesn’t have to be the case), it won’t be a problem but at this point a borderline miracle.
When I think about the strong tight end situations around the league, I almost never think of the room. There's the star TE and everyone else. For example, I don't think I could name you Kelce's back up or Kittle's back up despite Kittle being out with injury out a lot recently. Now, Chig ain't a superstar TE so maybe your right that he has room to be supplanted, but he was our biggest bet on offense which probably means he's going to get the snaps, targets, and benefits of the doubt at least at the start. Then, when you consider Bates probably is locked in as the second or blocking tight end, the third and fourth guys on the roster just won't get a lot of snaps unless something goes wrong.
 
I think it's both. We definitely overhype guys, but we also kill guys. Solid guys are talked about like bums all the time. Good players are talked about as mid or JAGs.

I think my favorite old school examples are Rock Cartwright and James Thrash. Rock was sometimes talked about as a monster and a great player. Thrash was viewed as the worst player in the league. Truth was, Thrash was a blue collar guy who was okay. They just asked him to do to much, but really the thrashing Thrash took from the fan base was over the top. They guy gave all he could and was all effort. He was okay and not a waste of a roster spot. Likewise, Rock was overhyped because he was literally the little guy we root for.

I remember someone who's active on this thread constantly ripping Ryan Grant because Jay Gruden kept praising him, saying he was just a JAG. And he was. But he also did two things really well: he knew his assignments and he blocked. Those aren't glamorous traits, but coaches value them, so I understood why Jay kept talking him up.

I don't remember people having the same disdain for James Thrash. I actually called into Redskins Lunch during a Q&A with Joe Gibbs and complimented Thrash. Gibbs couldn't have been more enthusiastic. He immediately talked about what a great special teamer he was, how well he blocked, and all the little things he did that helped the team.
Luke McCaffrey feels like the modern-day Thrash. Probably not someone who's going to light up the stat sheet, but a solid, dependable player who does the dirty work.

The problem is this franchise has spent decades celebrating role players because it hasn't had enough stars. There have been exceptions, of course, but Washington has consistently been near the bottom of the league in All-Pro selections. Year after year they're among the least represented teams in Top 100 rankings, whether they're voted on by players, coaches, executives, or built on analytics. Judging by ESPN's current coach/GM roster rankings, it wouldn't surprise me if Washington finishes near or at the bottom again.

That's why I think the conversation around Peters gets a little distorted. I think some fans overrate the job he's done, but I also don't think he's a bad GM. I remember you saying you thought the league viewed him more favorably than fans here do. Honestly, it feels closer to the opposite. If you look at how national analysts, scouts, and evaluators talk about this roster, they don't seem to think it's average—they think it's closer to bad than good. And I've read direct critiques of the job Peters has done in an article from the Athletic where they quoted other GMs about the FA signings and also the previous year an agent took a dig at lack of ambition for that FO with Jayden on a rookie contract.

Peters, like Quinn, has a great reputation as a smart, likable guy. Rivera had that reputation too. I thought McCloughan vouching for Peters as a dude but not as an evaluator seemed sort of fitting with some of the vibe I get. I do think Peters is learning and improving, and I absolutely love Josh Harris as an owner. I also think Jayden is good enough to elevate a roster that still has obvious flaws. That's why I think they'll probably make the playoffs despite the roster not being where it needs to be.

My biggest hope with Peters is that he's self-aware and learns from his mistakes. And my gut is he does. Howie Roseman wasn't universally praised early in his career either. I'm hoping some of Peters' draft picks and signings develop into legitimate stars because that's ultimately what changes franchises. So far, though, he hasn't broken Washington's long-running pattern of struggling to identify elite talent.

That said, he did break the quarterback curse. In my mind, that's the single hardest thing for a GM to do, and for that reason alone he's earned some patience from me.

But if this roster really is as poor as many national evaluators believe it is, then I think it's fair for Peters to start feeling some pressure next year. My guess, though, is that Jayden once again elevates a mediocre supporting cast, the defense takes a meaningful step forward, and they find their way into the playoffs. Then the real question becomes whether Peters finally gives his franchise quarterback the caliber of roster that lets him stop having to carry so much of the load. And while I don't think he did -- but still could if he signed Diggs, I am betting all hands are on deck in 2027 to get that done.
 
Last edited:
When I think about the strong tight end situations around the league, I almost never think of the room. There's the star TE and everyone else. For example, I don't think I could name you Kelce's back up or Kittle's back up despite Kittle being out with injury out a lot recently. Now, Chig ain't a superstar TE so maybe your right that he has room to be supplanted, but he was our biggest bet on offense which probably means he's going to get the snaps, targets, and benefits of the doubt at least at the start. Then, when you consider Bates probably is locked in as the second or blocking tight end, the third and fourth guys on the roster just won't get a lot of snaps unless something goes wrong.

f they're really going to lean into heavier personnel packages like we've been hearing, then having multiple quality tight ends becomes a much bigger deal. We've seen this movie before. The Patriots built a nightmare matchup with Gronk and Hernandez. The Ravens have done it with Andrews and Likely. The Bears are trying to do the same with Kmet and Loveland.

Even the Giants, who already have Theo Johnson—a player whose production is comparable to Chig's—still went out and invested even more at tight end by adding Likely.
 
Just listened to the Fowler segment.

A. He thinks they sign a WR, tough to know who
B. Thinks the ship has sailed with Aiyuk
C. Diggs would love to play in Washington though it feels to Fowler he's the type of signing is more Baltimore
D. Some kicking the tires with Keenan Allen albiet he's more of a slot now. But nothing recent
E. People he talks to in Washington say they want ideally a speed guy -- but there aren't great pickings on that front
 

Well he surely brings a ton to the table, probably still at his age (34). I mean, he caught 81 last year.

He does not however bring the outside speed option they really have been looking for

I was under the impression he was planning to stay with the Chargers - they have drafted a 1, 2 2's, 2 4's and 5 over the last 3 years at WR so they might not have room.

That also shows how almost committed the chargers have been to the WR position.
 
Last edited:
Not really sure we need that. Dyami brings that. Allen would be a sure handed big body for JD.
If you are satisfied with Dyami in that role, then I guess so. I am not. I see him as one of the many questions with the WR group that we have pinned our hopes on at this point.
 
f they're really going to lean into heavier personnel packages like we've been hearing, then having multiple quality tight ends becomes a much bigger deal. We've seen this movie before. The Patriots built a nightmare matchup with Gronk and Hernandez. The Ravens have done it with Andrews and Likely. The Bears are trying to do the same with Kmet and Loveland.

Even the Giants, who already have Theo Johnson—a player whose production is comparable to Chig's—still went out and invested even more at tight end by adding Likely.

Yup. Eagles had Ertz and Goedurt for years, Arizona drafted McBride for his ceiling even when they had older but still prime Ertz before we got him. Rams always have 2-3 above average at worst TE’s who can block and catch 40 balls. People may not know a lot of the role players but most teams have multiple TE’s much better and more well-rounded than what we’ve seen from Sinnott so far, and that doesn’t stop them from continuing to draft TE’s in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th nearly every year to keep the stable full at a premium position that can take time to develop.

Anyone who plays in deep fantasy leagues (or TE Premium leagues) knows how many viable TE’s litter the NFL landscape who aren’t big household names
 
Keenan Allen, immediate upgrade. Similar role to Diggs now, but likely more versatile in alignment and probably able to win quicker than he can, especially against certain opponents.

Think of Allen as a smaller Ertz (who can't block) but far better as a receiving option. Same style of shake and bake with footwork to get an open window for a throw. But neither can win open deeper like they used to. Allen can win in the intermediate range more reliably than Ertz could. Honestly think Keenan Allen does so much for our team if he comes here. Best case scenario, 750 yards, 6 TDs, above average success rate, above average catch rate. More likely he comes in at say 600 yards, 4 TDs. And he's not someone who has to be forcefed looks. He'll help the offense move the chains and keep drives consistent.

Terry + Chig + Antonio/Luke/Jaylin. Add in Keenan and the floor for receiving options has been raised considerably. I'd really like that. Feels like we'd be getting a younger Zach Ertz with a little more juice, and not pretend that Ertz(Keenan Allen) was a TE.

Allen's game has never been YAC, it's always been savvy. His game will age well. His metrics are not meaningfully declining like Stefon Diggs either. Allen's Depth of Target on routes has remained right near career averages unlike Diggs with a noticeable drop.

I have no real faith in Dyami, Burks, Van Jefferson, etc. But I do have faith in Keenan Allen being able to replicate a bit of what Noah Brown did for us in 2024 if not surpass the short area aspects of what Brown could produce.

A bunch formation with/without a stack featuring Keenan Allen, Chig, younger slot-ish guys (Williams, Lane, McCaffrey), Allen's savvy and know-how will keep him productive and dangerous there. I do not think in the slightest that Dyami/Burks/etc can help manipulate the defenders near that stack into doing something they shouldn't. Allen still does (or at least did that last season).
 
I think it's both. We definitely overhype guys, but we also kill guys. Solid guys are talked about like bums all the time. Good players are talked about as mid or JAGs.

I think my favorite old school examples are Rock Cartwright and James Thrash. Rock was sometimes talked about as a monster and a great player. Thrash was viewed as the worst player in the league. Truth was, Thrash was a blue collar guy who was okay. They just asked him to do to much, but really the thrashing Thrash took from the fan base was over the top. They guy gave all he could and was all effort. He was okay and not a waste of a roster spot. Likewise, Rock was overhyped because he was literally the little guy we root for.

and to make things worse, it seems like people dont to accept a player for being 'good', or at least 'good enough.'

Players have to be ALL PRO, or they need to be replaced. They cant miss a play, because it then becomes a defining moment that labels them as a liability and call them 'trash'.
 
If you are satisfied with Dyami in that role, then I guess so. I am not. I see him as one of the many questions with the WR group that we have pinned our hopes on at this point.

Well... in his latest video there's a whole section about faking the moon landing, so yeah... let's just hope we're relying on him for solely for his physical talents...
 
and to make things worse, it seems like people dont to accept a player for being 'good', or at least 'good enough.'

Players have to be ALL PRO, or they need to be replaced. They cant miss a play, because it then becomes a defining moment that labels them as a liability and call them 'trash'.

Do you have any particular “good enough” players in mind who have been over-criticized for not being elite, in your opinion? I’m struggling to think of someone this applies to
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 9, Members: 0, Guests: 9)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top