Actually I'm of the same opinion as yourself, some of which may be because of how much credence I give to your well spoken and defended positions. The final sentence of that post stated that I want us to sign BA/Diggs, trade for BTJ because there is a gaping hole at WR2 right now.
burgold was correct in pointing out that I was just reiterating a phrase commonly heard in NFL commentary of how a Tight end is a QBs best friend, and how that phrase I have also heard its spin-off of how a great running game or defense is also inserted there. I don't know why that phrase popped into my mind as I was perusing this thread but it did. so I took that brief moment of clarity and tried to help put everything in another perspective.
Currently our WR room is not good, but workable IF: Terry stays healthy, Williams quickly develops, AND Chig can be a reliable move the chains tight end. You can't have another "posse" if it's only 2 weapons. That would be just Matt and Festus lol. So please, don't feel that I was calling you out or even in disagreement on our need to add a legit WR2, as I was only intending to add some color to the convo.
Cool, fair enough, thanks.
No doubt a great running game and/or a great TE who can consistently move the chains can help a QB tremendously. Of course they can.
But there’s also a reason WRs get paid dramatically more than TEs and RBs. Outside of the QB position itself, elite receivers are viewed by the league as the biggest engines of modern offense.
Now, if the question is: would I take an elite RB like Barkley or an elite TE like Kelce over just a “good” WR2? Absolutely, I would. Elite talent is elite talent.
But if we’re talking elite WR versus elite TE or elite RB, I’m taking the elite WR every time — and so would most of the NFL. I doubt I’ll ever see a truly elite WR prospect like Jeremiah Smith passed over in favor of a TE or RB. The league has made its priorities crystal clear.
That’s why top WRs are pushing $40 million a year now while TEs and RBs aren’t even remotely in that neighborhood. Heck, even elite left tackles generally aren’t getting that kind of money.
And look, I understand all the “if this guy develops” and “if that player breaks out” arguments. If enough things go right, this offense could absolutely be very good. My issue is simply that there are too many “ifs” for my comfort level.
That said, I’m also nowhere near the national media crowd that acts like this roster is trash. I think this is a good football team. I loved what they did defensively. I think they’ll be competitive and potentially very good.
I just don’t think the roster is beyond criticism, and to me the two clearest weak spots remain WR and CB.
And I think that’s really the heart of the frustration for some of us. WR has felt like an unresolved issue around Jayden for three straight offseasons now, and a lot of us simply want to see the organization do absolutely everything possible to maximize a young franchise QB.
So when the pushback becomes not just “the current WR group might be enough,” but almost “WR isn’t really the priority to help a QB anyway,” that’s where it starts to feel strange to me.
Everyone’s entitled to their opinion, obviously. But it almost feels like a doctor telling a patient they need better hydration, and then someone jumping in saying, “No, don’t focus on water — there are better ways to solve it.” Sure, there are multiple ways to improve an offense. Nobody disputes that. But in today’s NFL, high-level WR play is one of the clearest and most proven ways to elevate a young quarterback.