I wonder if Peters is trying to build what the Packers and 9ers have done: build a good offense with fairly mediocre receivers
I wasn't too hot on Jennings, in general, but I wouldn't have minded him at that price. still, I view him as a high end #3 more than a #2 that others view him here...so that's a a decent chunk for a #3. we already have too many #3 and #4 receivers on our roster.
I wasn't too hot on Jennings, in general, but I wouldn't have minded him at that price. still, I view him as a high end #3 more than a #2 that others view him here...so that's a a decent chunk for a #3. we already have too many #3 and #4 receivers on our roster.
force fed the ball and was still, realistically, a #2 behind Kittle on a depleted team with without Aiyuk, Deebo in Fat-Deebo mode, and no CMC. Kyle knows how to manufacture touches. I'm not saying I think he's trash, but I view him as being a tier below someone like Jakobi Meyers.Why do you view him as a #3 vs a #2? He basically had a 1K season a season ago
true, missed the "up to" part.Up to $13M means it’s likely less with incentives. He would absolutely be a starting WR here (and if Williams beat him out for snaps, that’s a good problem to have).
1 year up to $13M is not expensive for this sort of player. We’re sitting on a zillion dollars, they just decided they didn’t want him at all and will wait on Aiyuk.
That decision could determine their futures here, depending on how the offense performs and how the season plays out. Let’s hope they’re right about depending on the Aiyuk addition.
The fact remains that they spent first rounders on fairly mediocre receivers, which is a problem the 9ers have had in the draft. Warren Sharp had a very interesting article on how badly they reach every draft.
We'll really need our young receivers to step forward.
Well I'd rather not spend exorbitant resources for mediocre results.So that’s not how AP has rolled so far in three offseasons.
Well I'd rather not spend exorbitant resources for mediocre results.
For example, Id much rather have Conerly and Tunsil than Pearsall and Stribling.
Well, I made this point with SIP. The 9ers are able to whiff on receivers because they haven't had to rebuild their OL. I mean if we were able to get Tunsil for a 3rd and a 5th, hypothetically, in no way is that a reference to any specific assface, we're better able to stack talent at receiver.Can’t disagree on that point.
Perfect way to sum it up. And to think that they already have Jefferson and Addison but still wanted to add more. I'm banking on them again knowing where Aiyuk is at and that AP is still a great terms with Kyle and Lynch so he knows the time table. That has to be true.......... Right?I thought Jennings would have been a great fit, and at that money? AP knows him so I guess I’ll defer, admittedly I’ve been saying that a lot so I hope he’s right… I’m not liking continuing to say it.
that's how I feel about it. but...don't get me wrong, Jennings would be a #2 on our team, if he signed with us, immediately. however, imo, that's more a product of how subpar our wr corps is. on any team with a relatively decent wr room, Jennings would be the "ideal #3" type, depending on what they require of their receivers. I will also say that, the longer it takes to get aiyuk in the building, the more I would've preferred having Jennings.Also, if you talk to Niners fans, a lot of them think that the receivers are a product of the system. Kyle gets Jennings easy, wide open catches with the scheme. The other guy who does that is Ben Johnson.
That's why Blough is more important than any of these signings. We have to hit on him, more than we do the players. If he schemes it up right, then a lot of these guys can be successful. I think that if Terry and Chig stay healthy, then we will have a good offense regardless
Probably means nothing...
So 1 year $13M (up to $13M even!) in the end, and low interest from us (which was apparent)
If Aiyuk isn’t healthy and fully integrated into this offense and productive by October, this regime will have a lot to answer for if we aren’t a playoff team. They may have bet their jobs on this situation
Also the implication that if we’d gotten Doubs, we would’ve potentially then passed on seriously pursuing Chig…is worrying. I worry this FO doesn’t have a clue and that offense/skill positions are a serious blind spot for them for whatever reason.
Well, I made this point with SIP. The 9ers are able to whiff on receivers because they haven't had to rebuild their OL. I mean if we were able to get Tunsil for a 3rd and a 5th, hypothetically, in no way is that a reference to any specific assface, we're better able to stack talent at receiver.
I am going to hope that Keim just worded it wrong and meant focus on Chig exclusively. I think that it was clear that they wanted a TE. Was he their first choice? I don't know.You already mentioned it yourself, but I'm repeating it for the people in the back because I'm floored more by Chig-Doubs admission than by Washington letting a cheap WR walk because he wasn't offering to pay us to play here.
The only reason the team took Chig, the younger version of Ertz, is because they missed on Doubs. If they had gotten Doubs, what the hell was their plan at TE? Is that secretly an endorsement that they think Sinnott is taking an astronomical leap from being unable to displace the jogger last year to making Chig redundant if there's another pass catcher on the team this year?
I'm losing my mind here.