Over the years, its somewhat changed as to how certain positions develop. LB isn't typically a fast developing spot. Guys like Devin Lloyd, Jack Campbell, weren't great their rookie seasons. Heck Lloyd really took three seasons. Some of this years FA's like Leo Chenal, Nakobe Dean didn't start their careers red hot.
It's a tough positon -- Logan Paulsen gets into well in one of his podcasts about how much LBs have on their plate, and learn offenses and how to diagnose plays and call plays if you play Mike, etc -- it's more complex than some other spots.
And the idea that recently converted safety, Sonny Styles, will be the exception and hit the ground running from the jump while possible is unlikely.
Styles is a really good player and I've mentioned for months he's my top trade down player. But taking ANY LB in the top 10 is very rare.
RBs don't go top 10 often, but a Bijan Robinson, Barkley do. And Love arguably is in this class.
The Lions broke the mode one recent draft of course and drafted both a RB and LB early. But the RB they took at 12, the LB at 18.
Running backs unlike LBs do tend to kill it right away if they are good. And in the rookie QB window and considering its only two more years left of it, I am not high on taking a player who might not make a major impact in year 1 versus a dude who can transform the offense.
And the fact that Love IMO is a better player than Styles, factoring the rest of my point, its a no brainer for me. If they don't take Love, the one explanation I'll accept is going for a premium position instead of nonpremium. But no way for me I'd endorse taking another nonpremium position player over Love.