Yeah, I had posted a few weeks ago that if you sign Pitts, it’s not really overlapping with your TE need as much as your WR need, where the crop is thin. So that’s a possibility if they get creative. Wouldn’t even stop me from possibly also signing another TE that’s more well-rounded.
Voice_of_Reason likes to joke that I am Keim or his kid. Nope.

But I've become a Keim addict as to nuggets as to FA and the drafts especially. And i'd guess about 95% of the time it correctly steers you at least in the right direction. And he often couches opinion as to what he's hearing without saying he's hearing it.
So to me that FA WR podcast was the first likely window into what they are thinking some.
A. They want an explosve player. Keim hit the point on WR because the topic was on that. Quinn sort of alluded to the same thing with Sheehan.
B. Feels like they outright would go for Pierce and Shaheed if they become available
C. They don't think WR is hot in FA, they do think other spots are better in FA
D. Sounds like they aren't hot for a possession type WR but might make an exception if Pittman becomes available.
E. Don't rule out Aiyuk. Sounds like they might kick the tires and decide.
But yeah they might be in a pickle if they want an explosive player who can stretch the field if Pierce and Saheed don't hit FA. They will definitely sign a TE. And if they can't get the WR that's explosive maybe then its a TE, and that would fit Pitts.
As to the draft also presents a tough scenario. At least judging by mocks, Tate might be gone by the time they pick. Tate isn't a burner but he's definitiely a stretch the field type. Tyson and Lemon aren't so much. Ditto Boston.
My point is they might not have many options if they are bent on this and Pitts is sort of an end around solution to the problem.