I am more forgiving of that with Kain because he was a receiver into his college career
Edit: noted that this is the wrong thread for this š«” but Iāll leave it to cap off the thought process on this page so itās readable, and not add further.
Thatās fair, but thatās just a different sort of risk. Like McCaffrey.
Every FO has its quirks. For us, it may be these late position-converts with raw athleticism that we bet onābut you need to have coaches who can develop them if you go that route. Clearly we whiffed on that during Quinn 1.0, and if it doesnāt improve during Quinn 2.0, these raw prospects are all gonna be starting over with new coaches in the future.
Back to FO quirksāin SF, they had a half decade stretch recently where they consistently drafted a mid round faller who had a serious IR-worthy injury their final year in college, in order to redshirt them and develop. It rarely worked out for them (not to say it never does). Under Bruce Allen for a stretch, we had a penchant for drafting ballers with no athleticism. Guys who were undoubtedly sound players with experience, who just couldnāt keep up and compete with superior athletes. Some teams only draft team captains. Some teams prefer Senior Bowl players when possible. Some prefer their lotto tickets to be young, early breakout phenoms who fell off later in their college careers but still had pedigree.
Lots of things can work, lots of things donāt work, an average of 4 GMās get fired every cycle I believe. Whatever trends we prefer, however we grade and stack players on our boardā¦they just need to hit.
I think for a bad football team lacking both starters and quality depth, taking the risk on questionable-ceiling/low floor guys with a long runway to productivity who need to be taught to play their NFL positionā¦maybe not the smartest move. Maybe a little āIām smarter than everyone elseā, actually. But weāll see. It may not even end up being a long term trend.
Edit: maybe the draft thread is the better spot for this, if we continue it. Not sure
