I put as much stock in BR as PFF. Which is very little. But I do agree with their grading of Bailey. He is too small to be an every down edge. And he lacks the bone structure to get bigger. I want to see what he weighs at the combine. IMO there is no way he is carrying 250 pounds. Chop Robinson is a really good comp from them imo.
![]()
John E. Moore III/Getty Images
- Slightly undersized to be a full-time edge defender in the NFL, Stanford had Bailey listed at 238 pounds in 2024 and Texas Tech's listing at 250 looks generous.
- Lacks the strength to be an effective run defender; he struggles to get extension on blocks and has skinny legs, which makes setting the edge against offensive linemen difficult.
- Not very physical at the point of attack.
- Has a habit of working around blocks, even against tight ends, often vacating his gap.
- Doesn't have the mass and strength to effectively turn speed to power against good competition.
All your trashing of David Bailey is going to speak it into existence. Trust me I can think of three examples of me going to war with a player in three different drafts and that's who they ended up taking.
Payne. It's not that I disliked him. But I didn't feel like he was going to be a great player albiet he had some rabid fans on the ES draft thread. To me he screamed a good player and nothing more. Wanted Vea, Fitzpatrick, Derwin James big time. Didn't happen for me.
Forbes. All the rumors closer to the draft they were looking at him in the first. Hated it, said he was a 2nd rounder. When they took him some on ES, mocked me as to whether I'll be OK after them taking him.
Haskins (RIP). I wrote tomes about why I thought he would be a bust.
